Ahh oops, no wonder I got confused. Thanks !!Hi KJK80, the quote that you are commenting on here - "in common everyday language Catholicism…" is actually a quote from** mikew262** here at post # 763 not from peary. Mike appears you be linking his quotes to peary. This is not peary’s quote.
Peace
SORRY PEARY! Same goes for Mike then, oops!I’m sorry, I deleted my last post…it might have been peary…I think…these quotes here and who they belong to, are getting all messed up…so double check…Ahh oops, no wonder I got confused. Thanks !!
Will do, sir!I’m sorry, I deleted my last post…it might have been peary…I think…these quotes here and who they belong to, are getting all messed up…so double check…
Peace
You’re right. It’s not.
It is you who have rejected Christ and His word by claiming somekind of foundation that is divorced from the Sacred Inspired Inerrant Word of God. You can claim your church is based on the Christ all you want but it is not on the foundation of the apostles and prophets with Christ being the cornerstone. Your church is not the church of the NT…
Wow! Go ahead and say what you mean–seriously!
When you say, “Word”, are you speaking of Jesus’ *written *word only? Do you think the Church founded by Jesus Christ was based on the written word?
Primarily the Gospels with the letters in a somewhat secondary position for discussion purposes.
Oral and written.
Just checking.
And the heresy continues.
No, ja4, this divorce is one of YOUR making, not of Catholics. Catholics recognize that the two were to be together until the end of the age. The Church is built on the foundation of the Apostles and prophets, not the book. The book reflects that foundation, but the Church is the pillar and foundation of the Truth. The Church produced the Sacred writings.
Don’t be too hard on ja4, he was deeply wounded by Catholics, and has been taught a lot of bigoted and prejudiced ideas on top of the wounds.
Because I was answering Peary’s objection to Catholicism being considered a denomination.“while maybe not technically correct”
I agree but only on this point (in blue).
Why do you keep linking your quotes to peary as if they are peary’s quotes? Is this intentional or accidental?
Peace
Newsflash, there are still a lot of folks who don’t consider Catholics, Christians, which of course is ludicrous.
I agree. Since there are no longer any Apostles or prophets on what is the church functioning on?
How is the church the foundation and pillar of the Truth when it is responsible for so much evil?
Are you saying that the church also produced the OT?
What is Jesus referring to here? Is He speaking of the church or something else?
Thank you for being sensitive to my wounds…Don’t be too hard on ja4, he was deeply wounded by Catholics, and has been taught a lot of bigoted and prejudiced ideas on top of the wounds.
:bowdown2: 
uch:How true…
This is not true. Did the OT Scriptures come from the catholic church?
Not so. I have the Scriptures and historical facts on my side…
Let’s say you buy a Ford F-150 pickup truck from your local dealer whose name is “Moses Ford.” Someone notices your new truck and asks where you got it. Would you say, “From Dearborn, Michigan”?
So we agree that the church is not totally responisble or the source of the entire Scriptures?
The “source” is God. I don’t think you’d get an argument from any Catholic on that.
The Old Testament was before the Catholic Church.
I’m glad you see that it is correct to say, “The Sacred Inspired Inerrant Word of God came from the Catholic Church.”
Because God tells us so, right in the Bible, as a matter of fact.
No, you don’t. You completely disregard the parts of the Bible that don’t fit into your heretical views. For proof, see the above comment to the first quote.