T
ToddM
Guest
‘Because I said so.’ Stopping ‘persecuting us’ w/your ‘inquisitions’How do you know the bible is right?
‘Because I said so.’ Stopping ‘persecuting us’ w/your ‘inquisitions’How do you know the bible is right?
Why, for instance, call yourself a (…) of peace while committing ‘Mass’ murder?Yes, of course, but what do you call a Christian who rejects all doctrines and dogmas of the Catholic faith? A “liberal, progressive Catholic?” No! That’s my point!! If Skyryder rejects all that is Cathoic, why not just drop the “catholic” label entirely??
All Catholics are Christian, but not all Christians are Catholic. See what I mean?
Cannot, or will not?when i read your post, i understood that was your intention (though i’m not the same person who you just wrote to). but just to throw in my 2 cents: I think that it would be better for him to research the Christian faith in which case he would be a true Catholic and would accept the Tradition and authority of the Church. It really doesn’t make sense to be a protestant since all authority of Scripture is only known by the Catholic Church, as she was the compiler. If he openly researches the teachings of the Church, from her own mouth and not from the mouth of dissenters, and if he humbly prays and begs for light from heaven, then there can be no doubt that he will accept the teachings of the Church and her Traditions. Otherwise, he would do better to say he is not religious at all and stop confusing others and himself by claiming to be Catholic or Christian.
that’s up to himCannot, or will not?
Actually this cafeteria catholic does give food to the homeless.The funny thing about cafeteria Catholics is that none of them have ever offered me free food…
…I should be sleeping…
I realize that you like most Catholics were brought up to believe that the church is in the ‘salvation of souls’ business. I would contend, along with many others, that the Church is not selling anything and especially salvation. The ‘soul’ is a pagan Greek concept Any Jew ,including Jesus, would call your idea of a soul absurd.from the way skyryder is sounding, i’m not sure he would necessarily believe in Catholic authority .Though I’m not judging the state of any particular individual’s soul, Rest assured, if they die in a state of mortal sin, their personal opinions will do them no good come judgment day. Let us continue to pray to the Holy Spirit that they will convert to the fullness of his truth and cooperate with his grace as it leads them to him.
Bro,Unfortunately liberal catholicism is not dead. It is thrusting its talons ever so deep into our shoulders and threatening to take a bite out of our necks.
Fortunately neither this or any other luciferian plot will prevail against the Church that Christ Himself instituted.
Pax Domini sit semper vobiscum.
What is your proof?Jesus called people into a WAY OF LIFE, not a style of worship, or system of sacraments…
How do you know this?The message of Christ is simple…LOVE GOD; LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR.
Proof?It has also created fictions such as Jesus wrote the mass, or made representations that Jesus dies eternally on the altar when the Bible says He died once and never again. Jesus never said anything about his tortured body being cut up like crutons and passed out to canibals as hor d’overs. Communion at best is a source of grace. The term Real Presence sounds like something from a Pagan Mystery Cult. The idea of Transubstantiation is based on Greek Ideas of Matter which have been universally disproved by science…God is everywhere. Jesus does not need a little gold tabernacle to live in. We experience the presence of God in many ways: grace ie co-union with God, scripture,and inner knowing that comes through prayer.
Proof?The Papacy of the Renaissance & the Curia are organs invented by Constantine’s State Funded Church-not Jesus.
You mean rationalism, materialism, scientism, nihilism and all the rest.Churches today are becoming irrelevant not because of worship style but because they no longer speak to a rational people in a scientific age.
You mean those who subscribe to this primitive theology you assert here.People see God as some sort of cop or judge with whom they can make deals.
Ah, old bad, new good.Liberals want to strip Catholicism of historic corruption and return to Christian Roots. Conservatives are addicted to power games and want to preserve traditions which fulfill their polical and economic agendas.
.
This is ironic because you could replace the word “liberals” above with “fundamentalist anti-Catholics” and say the exact same thing.Liberals want to strip Catholicism of historic corruption and return to Christian Roots. Conservatives are addicted to power games and want to preserve traditions which fulfill their polical and economic agendas.
.
I have a ‘joke’ for y’all.
What is the difference between ignorance and apathy?
Don’t know and could care less.
You have swallowed much misinformation about the reason behind the decline of Church attendance.Most of the people I know do not go to church. Churches today are becoming irrelevant not because of worship style but because they no longer speak to a rational people in a scientific age
.
Judie- I would tend to agree. There is no languaage or commonality between Conservative or Liberal Catholics.Sky- I totally disagree with every single thing you said. I do not feel at all controlled by the Church. In fact, the more I learn about it, the more I fall in love with Jesus and His Church. I have also experienced many answered prayers and what I can only describe as “miracles” in my life. So I will stick with Jesus and His Church.
I wish you well on your journey of faith. I don’t see that this discussion is really going anywhere… we’re talking about apples and oranges. What you describe is not Catholicism but something else entirely.
It has been a great ride, everyone! I’m out!Judie
Please do not say those things about Pope Benedict. You should never hope those types of things. By the way, we are gaining number not losing them. I think those people who leave now, probably should have left a long time ago. They are worrying more about their agenda, then God’s plan.Judie- I would tend to agree. There is no languaage or commonality between Conservative or Liberal Catholics.
Given the extremist positions of the current pope I think half if not more of American Catholic will either leave or not bother to attend.
I think what matters is my relationship with God not the present administration, do whatever you want. I will go my own way as well. Lets hope Ratzingers reign will be over soon.
Amy your blog is precisely why Benedict is a bad pope. The purpose of a good leader is to build bridges between people not fences.God invites everyone, to the kingdom NOT JUST REPUBLICANS OR CONSERVATIVES. Yes the conservatives are worrying about their agenda to the point they want to exclude anyone who doesn’t agree with them. Yes they are crippling the future with their refusal to modernize. Yes Catholics in the USA are losing numbers, were it not for Mexican Immigration. Both Mexicans and native US Catholics are leaving the church…roughtly about a third. Check out both Gallup and Pew Polls. My comment stands I think there is no hope of commonality between Liberals and Conservatives and progressives like myself, need to look for other congregations.Please do not say those things about Pope Benedict. You should never hope those types of things. By the way, we are gaining number not losing them. I think those people who leave now, probably should have left a long time ago. They are worrying more about their agenda, then God’s plan.
Thanks for your thoughts. One of the problems with the Early Church Fathers is they destroyed the works of anyone who disagreed with them, and forged documents to justify their theological and political positions. Information is power.SKYRYDER,
I could respond with so much biblical and historical evidence to show you that you have been misinformed regarding your views of the Church, but I honestly sense a stern hardness of heart and a lack of willingness to consider the possibility that your conclusions could be erroneous. For anyone who believes that God has left us humans here to figure everything out about him on our own, I think the best approach is such sincere humility to realize that things we may sincerely believe to be true could in fact be wrong. It is not until we come to this point of brokenness and openness to God that he is able to draw us as we sincerely and humbly seek and approach his truth.
You seem to believe in Jesus and believe that he did in fact teach a message and whatever that message is that he taught should be followed. To this point, we all on here can agree. I think we can build on this fact by pulling together all the resources of the early Church Fathers, who wrote well before the middle ages and those who even wrote before Constantine.
I used to be a very skeptical Protestant before I became Catholic. For me and for so many other converts to the Catholic faith, the early Church Fathers played a crucial role. I’ve spent many seemingly sleepless nights engulfed in their writings. One of the most interesting things one will discover is their understanding of authority, particularly apostolic authority. I will leave you with a few gems from their writings in a separate post, but before I do, I would like to again recommend to pray and to seek God and his truth for what it is. If you disagree with the Catholic Church, I would recommend that instead of trying to change her to fit your views, perhaps you should take more time to figure out why she teaches what she does. If you cannot accept her teachings, then I am unsure why you might want to continue to consider yourself Catholic. As we are on our journeys of faith, let us continue to pray and seek God’s truth and realize that our time is short on this earth and soon we will all (myself included) have to give an account to God for what we have done here on earth.
By any chance, have you been kidnapped by a cult?Thanks for your thoughts. One of the problems with the Early Church Fathers is they destroyed the works of anyone who disagreed with them, and forged documents to justify their theological and political positions. Information is power.
To verify facts historically, you need to get writings and documents from people outside the organization or nation to verify what really happened. These don’t exist. Self referential proofs." Eg. The Bible is true, because the Bible says so." are invalid.Sorry but archeology shows a totally different picture of early Christianty than what Official Texts propose.Yes, some Books were cooked. eg Flavius Josephus. Yes, some Epistles were written by others and then falsely attributed to Apostles (eg St. Paul’s Pastorals) Yes Gospels were rewritten to fit political agendas Eg. Codex of the Sinai vs the Codex of the Vatican. Yes there are many missing writings eg. Works of Phillip the Evangelist mentioned in Acts. Texts from Nag Hammadi may give clues to what really happened prior to Time of Constantine.-too bad they were suppressed . Lastly there are many disturbing but unexplained links between the teaching of Classical Mystery Relions, and Early Christianity we can document using computer analysis of texts that the Church refuses to discuss. (Why not? )
Tradition is more often than not;; legend. I would prefer to base my life on facts not make believe. The low moral character of early popes is reflected in equally the low moral character of today’s bishops who covered up the Pedophilla Scandal. To quote an old saying: The Flag and Cross are the Refuge Of Scoundrals! Let’s be sceptical and make sure our beliefs are true and not based on propaganda.