Is medjugorji fake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rosie11
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rosie11

Guest
I’ve been there and I’m going again next year and I planned to go every year for the rest of my life but I’ve read on here that 2 local bishops in medjugorji weren’t convinced this makes me very sad because medjugorji gave me my faith back I saw I felt things there that I’ve never experienced before in my life I felt so overwhelmed by the Holy Spirit I cried and cried when I was there I saw the miracle of the dancing sun
 
Its just my personal belief, but I have never thought it was authentic. Yet I know people, whom I respect and admire, who express the same feeling as the OP.
 
that 2 local bishops in medjugorji weren’t convinced
This means it’s not going to be officially “promoted” as worthy of belief by the Church, but it also doesn’t mean - until stated as such - that you can’t believe it. The Church remains neutral until it has sufficient information to make a decision, leaving the door open to individuals to decide.
 
I can’t really believe it, but hey, to each his own.
 
This means it’s not going to be officially “promoted” as worthy of belief by the Church, but it also doesn’t mean - until stated as such - that you can’t believe it. The Church remains neutral until it has sufficient information to make a decision, leaving the door open to individuals to decide.
Yes, the Church moves very slowly on these matters-as well she should. And even if the apparitions are never officially approved, that doesn’t mean that they’re not authentic.
 
Last edited:
This video closed the case for me (clickbait title notwithstanding).

 
Last edited:
Whether it is real or not, or sanctioned by the Church or not, anything that strengthens one’s faith in God can’t be all bad.
 
One could also argue that faith shouldn’t be based on whether or not Mary appeared to these people. Who, by the way, have spent decades making a tidy profit off their “visions.”
 
Last edited:
I would disagree with this FWIW. Anything inauthentic eventually brings with it the risk that the truth will end up weakening the faith when its comes out. Anything that we believe should be based on truth, not make-believe or wishful thinking.
 
Aren’t we not supposed to discuss unapproved apparitions here?
 
Rules of the forum.

Until an apparition receives Church approval, it is best to stay away.

There are plenty of approved apparitions, visit Fatima or Lourdes or Guadalupe!
 
Our RCIA priest said as long as it increases faith it doesn’t really matter if it was fake or not (same with all apparitions ). I don’t know if I agree as I feel things like the video above undermine credibility of the Church in the eyes of those outside of it
 
The Catholic Church didn’t approved it, so why wouof the video undermine her?
 
Last edited:
I wasn’t so surprised by her reaction; I’m not sure that such experiences would necessarily mean that all external awareness would be so totally suspended or blocked out that one couldn’t react to some perceived danger, for example. I was more concerned with her explanation, which seemed sort of contrived.
 
The above mentioned scholar, Donal Foley, has also written books about the Medjugorje phenomena. The latest book was published in 2011. Titled ‘Medjugorje Revisited’ it follows the visions from day one, to the beginning of the most recent commission, which began in 2010. It also tells about the background of the area, and the mix of folk religious practices, and sort of explains the tension between the Franciscans who are now in charge of the parish, and the local diocese.

I would also recommend reading a thread on this forum, entitled’ Medjugorje: A True confession’. I can’t post the link, using the browser I’m using. But, it should come up easily, in the search feature on the forum it is usually the third response in the list that comes up, in terms of relevance. It was started by a former sister, an American of Croatian descent, who was sent to a convent near Medjugorge, in hopes that she could learn the language, then be sent back. However, she had to leave, after two and a half years, due to illness. She is open and honest about how she was disrespectful to the bishop, and other things. You should really look it up. Although it is about 280 posts long. Both pro and anti authentic people posted, and most were quite honest, and respectful. In fact, it stayed going for about a year…an unusual thing, for any Medjugore-related thread! What we can’t discuss are the actual contents of the visions, or aposts that are meant simply to promote the apparitions. The facts of the case, the question of whether the church approves or not, and objective data are permitted.

I have more information, but will save that for when it becomes relevant here. Please, I hope you don’t have your faith wrapped in the reality ot unreality of these , or any apparitions. Even approved apparitions are not required for faith, and do not have to be believed in.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top