U
upant
Guest
or will they be satisfied with a ban on some guns?
would an appeal succeed?
would you cooperate?
on which side?
they have been trying for a long time. is the time right?
.
.
.http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/molon-labe/
www.ammoland.com
would an appeal succeed?
would you cooperate?
on which side?
they have been trying for a long time. is the time right?
.
.
.http://blog.jonolan.net/politics/molon-labe/
“No one is talking about taking away your guns,” say those who claim “all” they want is “commonsense gun safety laws.” Someone forgot to tell them that some publications have opinion pieces belying that.
![www.ammoland.com](https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Oath-Keepers.jpg)
Mask is Coming Off ‘Commonsense Gun Safety Law’ Disclaimers
Plenty more examples exist to refute the reassurances that no wider disarmament goals exist.
![www.ammoland.com](https://www.ammoland.com/favicon-32x32.png)
http://gunscholar.com/gunban.htmIn fact, the assault weapons ban will have no significant effect either on the crime rate or on personal security. Nonetheless, it is a good idea . . . . Its only real justification is not to reduce crime but to desensitize the public to the regulation of weapons in preparation for their ultimate confiscation.
Charles Krauthammer (columnist), Disarm the Citizenry. But Not Yet, Washington Post, Apr. 5, 1996 (boldface added).