B
ByzCathCantor
Guest
We chantDoes a Byzantine DL have sections where the priest does inaudible prayers? If there are such times, what is the Byzantine mind supposed to do during those times.
We chantDoes a Byzantine DL have sections where the priest does inaudible prayers? If there are such times, what is the Byzantine mind supposed to do during those times.
But the latter does not necessitate the former.Uniformity of thought leads to unity of mind.
There really is no “break” from the communal spirit of the Liturgy even when we have personal thoughts that are not identical to another person’s. The Holy Spirit is the one that ensures there will be homothumadon at all times.Either the deacon should be leading the Litanies or the cantor leading a hymn. There’s really a lot of things given for the congregation to do during a Divine Liturgy. The only time that you are really given a “break” is during the Homily.
The Byzantine praxis dictates that there should be no imagination during prayer. Read this nice article about the Jesus Prayer:But the latter does not necessitate the former.
There really is no “break” from the communal spirit of the Liturgy even when we have personal thoughts that are not identical to another person’s. The Holy Spirit is the one that ensures there will be homothumadon at all times.
Blessings,
Marduk
By imagination, I assume you mean when the article says “As soon as your thoughts are not occupied in your work’s behalf, let them turn again to Prayer.”The Byzantine praxis dictates that there should be no imagination during prayer. Read this nice article about the Jesus Prayer:
orthodoxprayer.org/Articles_files/Colliander-JesusPrayer.html
Even if you are praying, is your prayer the right prayer? Why trust your own prayer over the prayer that has been given to you by a Saint? In the Byzantine praxis, there is less preference for “free-style” prayer and more emphasis on prayers that were written by Fathers, Saints, Monks, etc. The more uniform the prayer is and the more theologically correct it is, the better. There is heavy emphasis on lex orandi, lex credendi in the Byzantine praxis.By imagination, I assume you mean when the article says “As soon as your thoughts are not occupied in your work’s behalf, let them turn again to Prayer.”
OK. So the priest says, “let us pray for the sick.” Our work is to pray for the sick. But my immediate thought would be for my wife who has a fever. The person next to me might be thinking of his aunt who was just hospitalized. Is my thought opposed to my work, just because it is different from the one sitting next to me at Mass/DL? Different thoughts, same purpose - to pray for the sick. The Spirit brings it all together before the altar of God among the mystical community of Saints.
Yes, I know we can formally ask for individual petitions to be read out loud, but those personal petitions that remain silent are certainly not excluded from the intentions of the mystical community of Saints that are united by and in the Spirit before the altar of God.
Blessings,
Marduk
What does “free style” prayer have to do with any of this? Just because my thoughts and intentions are different from the person sitting next to me does not make a prayer “free style.”Even if you are praying, is your prayer the right prayer? Why trust your own prayer over the prayer that has been given to you by a Saint? In the Byzantine praxis, there is less preference for “free-style” prayer and more emphasis on prayers that were written by Fathers, Saints, Monks, etc. The more uniform the prayer is and the more theologically correct it is, the better. There is heavy emphasis on lex orandi, lex credendi in the Byzantine praxis.
I might repeat my earlier post… Sorry. You have charitably countered better than I likely could have done, given how totally I don’t agree with the perspective being insisted upon.What does “free style” prayer have to do with any of this? Just because my thoughts and intentions are different from the person sitting next to me does not make a prayer “free style.”
I would really love to hear from another Eastern Catholic on this fwhole matter, because I think your statements are pretty extreme.
Blessings,
Marduk
I might repeat my earlier post… Sorry. You have charitably countered better than I likely could have done, given how totally I don’t agree with the perspective being insisted upon.
“Unity in diversity” is a phrase often used in the East-- Orthodox and Catholic. The kind of super correct, black and white statements given in this thread as Eastern praxis are simply alien to my experience of the East from my own worship in Orthodoxy and Greek Catholics of various Churches (OCA, ROCOR, Greek Orthodox, Antiochian, Melkite, Byzantine/Ruthenian, and my own Russian Greek Catholic), and from study, and general living my ordinary life amongst these communities of lay and clergy. So back to my origional response: “”
One of the things I appreciate about the Byzantine liturgy is the individual diversity. One person is lighting candles, one is reverencing an icon with his daughter, one is making the Sign of the Cross to unite herself with a petition mentioned in the litany, one is standing, one is sitting. There are only a few times in the Liturgy everyone is expected to stop what they’re doing and focus on the same thing. The priest comes out to the nave and the deacon tells everyone to be attentive when those times come.
goarch.org/archdiocese/departments/outreach/resources/guidelinesworship
We are all able to meet the Lord where we are during the liturgy. What I see on this thread is examples of how different people are able to engage the liturgy and meet the Lord. It works for them. The beauty of the Byzantine liturgy is that they have the freedom to pursue it.