C
Contarini
Guest
Well, having argued for the prosecution I’ll argue for the defense:Thanks! I always assumed the Catholic Church had certain Popes who would twist Scripture to commit evil acts, but I never could find proof.
Urban was urging reform and trying to get the European nobility to stop killing each other. He genuinely wanted to help the Byzantines and he genuinely wanted to stop Seljuk aggression. Fulcher of Chartres’ version, especially, puts his address in the context of the “Peace of God” and “Truce of God” movements. Other versions stress the alleged Turkish atrocities. These stories were very likely exaggerations, but Urban probably believed them. One can’t charge him directly with responsibility for everything the Crusaders did, like the massacres of Jews in Europe (which the local bishops tried to prevent) or the massacres they committed in the Holy Land when they captured cities. But I think we can say that if they heard Scriptural passages proclaimed in the message urging them to war, they would take those passages as justifying the atrocities they committed, even if Urban hadn’t intended it that way. So it’s not necessary to see Urban as evil (which I don’t think he was) in order to say that he used the Scriptures in a way that led to evil acts.
Edwin