Islam supports religious freedom than Catholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheProphet
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
discipleofJesus:
No one is forcing Muslims to live in France. If Muslims don’t like it, they can leave and go live in a Muslim country.

Why are Muslims living in the west anyway, if they believe Islamic laws are so good and better than western laws? Why dont they live in Muslim countries? Why do they immigrate to the west?
The Europeans invited them because they needed cheap labor and because the French wanted to form an alliance with the Arabs against the US. The Europeans would bring technological talent to the alliance, and the Arabs would bring energy.
 
Semper Fi:
Ditto on this one. If Sharia is so much better than our laws, then why are Muslims here?
Most Muslim nations do not have sharia law. Saudi is closest to sharia law, and few of them have emigrated to Europe.
 
40.png
Ortho:
What evidence is there that the Holy Spirit guides the selection of the pope? Evidence of religious beliefs is always an enlightening topic.
Ortho,

While you will perhaps not find the following sufficient evidence I present it to you as the basis for the belief that the Catholic Church is guided by the Holy Spirit. While these verses do not specifically address the selection of the pope, they do give Peter the authority in the Church on earth, and we believe through apostolic succession that authority to his successor the pope, as well as guiding the Church as a whole.

“Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father. And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” Matthew 16:17-19

“The Advocate, the holy Spirit that the Father will send in my name–he will teach you everything and remind you of all that (I) told you.” John 14:26

Peace,

George
 
40.png
Ortho:
Is sending an army to stop proselytizing tolerance?
Agree with it or not, but the United States did not send our military to Iraq to convert or kill Muslims. Religion is only an issue to the extremist who are killing their fellow Muslims in the name of Islam.

Peace,

George
 
40.png
discipleofJesus:
No one is forcing Muslims to live in France. If Muslims don’t like it, they can leave and go live in a Muslim country.
so, you have the right to complain about the “unjust” treatment the christians who chose to live and work in muslim countries like saudi arabia, but muslims aren’t allowed to complain about the unjust treatment of other muslims who live in western “christian” countries?

similar to your statement above, the same holds true of non-muslims in muslim countries. no one’s forcing non-muslims to live and work in muslim countries earning tax-free salaries. if they don’t like the islamic law systems of muslim countries, they can leave and go live in a western non-muslim country.
George Waters:
Agree with it or not, but the United States did not send our militay to Iraq to convert or kill Muslims.
no, they went in there to remove an oppressive regime and install one of their own. the converting and killing is just an “added bonus”.
 
Semper Fi:
More like to stop attacks, persecution & forced conversions.
Semper Fi wrote:
“The Crusades were responses to Muslim aggression and proselytizing in Christian countries.”

Proselytizing?
 
George Waters:
Ortho,

While you will perhaps not find the following sufficient evidence I present it to you as the basis for the belief that the Catholic Church is guided by the Holy Spirit. While these verses do not specifically address the selection of the pope, they do give Peter the authority in the Church on earth, and we believe through apostolic succession that authority to his successor the pope, as well as guiding the Church as a whole.

“Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father. And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” Matthew 16:17-19

“The Advocate, the holy Spirit that the Father will send in my name–he will teach you everything and remind you of all that (I) told you.” John 14:26

Peace,

George
I understand why you believe it. Instead of asking for evidence of other religions’ beliefs, maybe we should be asking why they believe what they do. All religions have trouble producing evidence, but none have trouble explaining why they believe.
 
George Waters:
Agree with it or not, but the United States did not send our military to Iraq to convert or kill Muslims. Religion is only an issue to the extremist who are killing their fellow Muslims in the name of Islam.

Peace,

George
Semper Fi:
“The Crusades were responses to Muslim aggression and proselytizing in Christian countries.”
 
40.png
r.gonzales:
no, they went in there to remove an oppressive regime and install one of their own. the converting and killing is just an “added bonus”.
r.gonzales, do you really think that is the case? Do you have any evidence that Christians are actively attempting to convert Muslims in Iraq? I believe Iraq has always had a small Christian minority, and I would not be surprised if they have always, albeit quietly, spread the gospel, but is there any indication that Christianity is now actively and assertively being taught en masse?

As far as killing Muslims I went to boot camp, Hospital Corps School and Field Medical Service School with Muslims who are now serving in Iraq. None of them, or I, would consider killing anyone a bonus. If the killing of Muslims is indeed an “added bonus” of the US administration than proof will be needed to end such a heinous practice. You may suspect it, but with out proof it is nothing.
 
40.png
Ortho:
I understand why you believe it. Instead of asking for evidence of other religions’ beliefs, maybe we should be asking why they believe what they do. All religions have trouble producing evidence, but none have trouble explaining why they believe.
So very True. Perhaps someday we will all learn this and live in peace.
 
We must be careful in our trying to take down the Muslims, because many of these same arguments are used by Atheists, and even Protestants to try to tear down our faith in our Church.
In C.S. Lewis’ Narnia books, there is a neighboring kingdom to Narnia to the South that believes in a God Tash. Tash is basically the devil, but to these people, he is the only god they’ve ever known. It was those who didn’t even believe in Tash, but used his name to give themselves power who were realy damned at the end of the book.
In the end of the books, when the world has ended, a honorable prince from this neighboring land makes it to Heaven, and Aslan (who is Jesus in these books) tells the Prince that anything he did in righteousness, even if he did it in the name of Tash, Alsan himself accepted. He said that Tash, since he is the opposite of Aslan in every way, cannot accept deeds that belong to Aslan, and Aslan cannot accept deeds that belong to Tash, even when done in His name.
“But I haven’t known you,” says the prince.
But Aslan tells him that in his heart he sought Him and by serving Tash he was realy serving Him.
C.S. Lewis was a good theologian. If you use this analogy in real life, this means that nobody on this earth is realy unnacountable just because they were missled by their religion. The Devil, if he tricks them into thinking they are doing something good, and that he is good, then they are still following good. His is the hard job of convincing people to do bad. He uses the confusion of other religions other than the Catholic Church (only one truth) to promote his cause, but it isn’t an end, only a means to an end.
It also means that what the Church says is true, that there is salvation for those who are outside the Church but live righteously.
Its confusing, but I think that even if there is nothing of our God in Islam we must not condemn its followers. Following Islam in itself isn’t the sin, it is doing acts that intrinsicly can only be accepted by Satan (suicide bombings, murders, trying to tear down Christianity, abuse, opression). The Devil cannot present people with a Holy doctrine and get them to hell. He must make them do something they know is evil.
I think Islam is not intrinsically evil. It has good points, otherwise no good people would follow it so devoutly. But I think Satan definately uses it a lot, and may have helped found it. Anyone who rejects the Gospels and the Church and takes up Islam, the Church teaches they are in dire danger of damnation.
So all we need to do in order to seperate the good Muslims from the bad is to give the gospel to those we meet (use words if you have to), and watch for those who act righteously as Muslims. Other than that, lets show love.
Patrick
 
40.png
Ortho:
That’s the wrd Semper Fi used. Maybe he can explain it.
Semper Fi mentioned the Muslims’ “aggression AND proselytizing”… That may not be the best way to word it, though, since in that case the aggression and the proselytizing were one and the same.
 
George Waters:
You are correct; the root of today does come from the past. It is the fact that modern Muslims have refused to learn from the past that concerns me. Yes, Catholic have been the abusers, I have not forgotten that fact, but can you tell me that Muslims have not been the abusers, or Jews or pagans? Sure the current situation is related, but only so far as current abuses are justified by the abuses of the past. Is this right or is this simply justification? Who started the cruelty is not as important as who will end it. Once again that question is used as a justification for current abuses. History will repeat itself over and over and over again until we learn! Will we learn from past atrocities or will we continue to use them to justify our sins?

Peace,

George
I have a very unorthodox feeling, namely that God’s Spirit can operate within other religions as well. It could be that Islam is another way, which contradicts what I wrote earlier, it is probably wrong, but it is a nagging feeling that I have had for some time.
Tomas
 
40.png
Pythagoras:
Well it depends on the muslim country that you are living in. Saudi Arabia bans christian prayer groups, bibles, rosaries in its land. In some Muslim countries, if a Muslim converts to a Christian, he is automatically sentenced to death
Much of such things may be based loosely in islamic religion, but they are used more often as tools by those who would oppress and control.
 
Liberalsaved,
How do you know? Have you studied the religion, or is this just your intuition?
I am OK with your stance, and I partly share it (read my post above) but too many people just assume that Islam is a religion of peace. There are peaceful Muslims, but I’ve read quotes from some of them who think the passive ones are the bad Muslims, or lukewarm Muslims and the one’s promoting Jihad are the good Mulsims.
Patrick
 
40.png
r.gonzales:
so, you have the right to complain about the “unjust” treatment the christians who chose to live and work in muslim countries like saudi arabia, but muslims aren’t allowed to complain about the unjust treatment of other muslims who live in western “christian” countries?

similar to your statement above, the same holds true of non-muslims in muslim countries. no one’s forcing non-muslims to live and work in muslim countries earning tax-free salaries. if they don’t like the islamic law systems of muslim countries, they can leave and go live in a western non-muslim country."
What a joke of a comparison.

What you said might apply to western Christians who move to Muslim countries, but not to Middle Eastern Christians who were the indigenous peoples of the Middle East and other indigenous Christians who live in lands that were originally Christian and where Muslims invaded and conquered them and imposed their Islamic laws on them. Muslims invaded and conquered lands that were Christian, forcing Islamic law upon them and a lot of these Christians are not free to leave these countries. Christians in Iraq and Egypt etc are the indigenous people of their countries with the Muslim Arabs in power since they conquered these indigenous Christians. Some of them do not want to leave their land and prefer to suffer because they see the land as theirs and feel they should stay in their land and shouldn’t allow oppressors to force them out.

"Talking about the Muslim invasion of Egypt and the subsequent replacement of the Coptic language with Arabic, Spencer refers to one 12th century Coptic monk’s view of the Muslim invaders**:**

Coptic was indeed replaced by Arabic, but the transition was made not by nature, but by war. One twelfth-century Coptic monk, speaking almost five hundred years after the Muslim conquest of Egypt, still found it within him to assert, “We are the masters of this country, both from the point of view of population as well as for the land tax. The Muslims took it from us, they appropriated it by force and violence, and it is from our hands that they seized power.” He also referred to** “the massacre that they wrought on our kings and our ruling families during their conquest.”** In the fourteenth century, an Egyptian Muslim writer noted, “the Copts declare that this country still belongs to them, and that the Muslim evicted them from it unlawfully.”
([Spencer, Robert. Onward Muslim Soldiers: How Jihad Still Threatens America and the West [Regnery Publishing, Inc., 2003],] Ibid., p. 176)"
Taken from
answering-islam.org.uk/Responses/Abualrub/terrorism1.htm
(bold and underline emphasis mine)

It’s not as if Muslims were the original people in France and then the French came, invaded and conquered them and started treating them badly. Besides, the headscarf issue is nothing compared to how non-Muslims are treated under Islam.

On top of that, it’s not as if France wants to conquer the world and impose its laws on the world. However, Islam does want to do this to the world!
But, in traditional Islam, Christian and Jewish states must be destroyed and their lands conquered. When Mohammed was waging war against Mecca in the seventh century, Christianity was the dominant religion of power and wealth. As the faith of the Roman Empire, it spanned the entire Mediterranean, including the Middle East, where it was born. The Christian world, therefore, was a prime target for the earliest caliphs, and it would remain so for Muslim leaders for the next thousand years…
With enormous energy, the warriors of Islam struck out against the Christians shortly after Mohammed’s death. They were extremely successful. Palestine, Syria, and Egypt—once the most heavily Christian areas in the world—quickly succumbed. By the eighth century, Muslim armies had conquered all of Christian North Africa and Spain. In the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks conquered Asia Minor (modern Turkey), which had been Christian since the time of St. Paul. The old Roman Empire, known to modern historians as the Byzantine Empire, was reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western Europe asking them to aid their brothers and sisters in the East.
That is what gave birth to the Crusades.
Taken from ‘The Real History of the Crusades’ By Thomas F. Madden crisismagazine.com/april2002/cover.htm
(bold and underline emphasis mine)
 
40.png
TheRaiders:
Liberalsaved,
How do you know? Have you studied the religion, or is this just your intuition?
I am OK with your stance, and I partly share it (read my post above) but too many people just assume that Islam is a religion of peace. There are peaceful Muslims, but I’ve read quotes from some of them who think the passive ones are the bad Muslims, or lukewarm Muslims and the one’s promoting Jihad are the good Mulsims.
Patrick
I study it. I write stories involving many things, and religion is one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top