T
TEPO
Guest
If I saw this individual walking down the street, it would immediately catch my attention… It’s so far over-the-top, it begs for suspicion.
If I saw this individual walking down the street, it would immediately catch my attention… It’s so far over-the-top, it begs for suspicion.
You want me to be honest? I feel like I’m looking at an assassin who wants my head by order of the sultan.
I thought this was the 21st century, not Ancient Nazareth?Real Jesus and Mary photographs
Remember her? She’s never been seen without her veil and a long flowing dress.
You people should quit whining about how women should get to wear whatever they want when there is a motherload of evidence against that. How many times do I need to say this?
But why specifically does this matter?I thought this was the 21st century, not Ancient Nazareth?
Whoa! What’s wrong with Ancient Nazareth?I thought this was the 21st century, not Ancient Nazareth?
Well to start, the Catechism does admit that forms of modesty are relative while the virtue itself is not. Pairing that with my own understanding of modesty (which includes a few dictionary definitions of the word), I’ve come to conclude that it has less (if not nothing) to do with superficial standards of appearances and more with what degree of attention one draws to oneself.But why specifically does this matter?
(I’m just neutrally pushing you to make articulate and philosophical posts)
Oh plenty.But why specifically does this matter?
(I’m just neutrally pushing you to make articulate and philosophical posts)
How might one apply your view to nuns, who do dress very much like most of the statues of Mary I’ve seen?Well to start, the Catechism does admit that forms of modesty are relative while the virtue itself is not. Pairing that with my own understanding of modesty (which includes a few dictionary definitions of the word), I’ve come to conclude that it has less (if not nothing) to do with superficial standards of appearances and more with what degree of attention one draws to oneself.
Certainly one who dresses in the manner of ancient Jewish women in the midst of an urban population (with its heavy, crowded mix of printed shirts, business suits, jeans, pants, skirts of varying lengths, shoes, sneakers, high-heels, fedoras, beanies, caps, hairstyles etc…) is going to draw more attention than the geek with a hoodie or the punk chick in sleeveless.
Not quite. Which nuns are we talking here? Different orders can have different habits, colors, and even symbols. You can argue that it is derived but a derivation isn’t exactly the same thing is it? Furthermore nuns do attract a bit of attention but only as so far as police officers, firefighters, nurses, and uniformed students do because well, it acts as a sort of uniform that identifies them as nuns.How might one apply your view to nuns, who do dress very much like most of the statues of Mary I’ve seen?
If I were to walk around in a cassock, I wonder what would people think…? Would they admire my zeal for embracing the Church, or would they mock me and call me an imposter…?How might one apply your view to nuns, who do dress very much like most of the statues of Mary I’ve seen?
I wonder if the lower image could be considered as modest as the top. It was Asher Levines "twisted and Fringed"cassock from 2010’s Fall Fashion Week.
Pairing that with my own understanding of modesty, I’ve come to conclude that it has less more with what degree of attention one draws to oneself.
Certainly one who dresses in the manner of ancient Jewish women in the midst of an urban population is going to draw more attention than the geek with a hoodie or the punk chick in sleeveless.
http://sttheresedelisieux-wellington.myownparish.com/images/sttherese.gifNot quite. Which nuns are we talking here? Different orders can have different habits, colors, and even symbols. You can argue that it is derived but a derivation isn’t exactly the same thing is it? Furthermore nuns do attract a bit of attention but only as so far as police officers, firefighters, nurses, and uniformed students do because well, it acts as a sort of uniform that identifies them as nuns.
I don’t think priesthood or religious life can properly be talked about as “earning” a title. I would tend to agree with you that one should dress according to one’s station in life, but how does that help us distinguish between the clothing and the modesty of a nun and a Muslim woman?If I were to walk around in a cassock, I wonder what would people think…? Would they admire my zeal for embracing the Church, or would they mock me and call me an imposter…?
I think it’s best to just blend in, unless that is you have earned a certain title that requires a more distinguishable attire.
Our job as Catholics is to be the light of the world -in the world. Not to isolate ourselves as a “special” people.
Or how about a man dressed modestly as a woman.If I were to walk around in a cassock, I wonder what would people think…? Would they admire my zeal for embracing the Church, or would they mock me and call me an imposter…?
I think it’s best to just blend in, unless that is you have earned a certain title that requires a more distinguishable attire.
Our job as Catholics is to be the light of the world -in the world. Not to isolate ourselves as a “special” people.
Her face is not covered as with a face veil and burka.http://sttheresedelisieux-wellington.myownparish.com/images/sttherese.gif
How about this nun?I’m not properly sure whether the Carmelite habit is a derivation of 1st century Palestinian garb, but honestly, I don’t see any salient difference. Yes, certain parts of the habit have symbolic value to the order and to the individual, but I, for one, am completely ignorant of any of that. I just see a woman dressed as I assume Mary would dress.
I can acknowledge that a nun’s habit functions as a sort of uniform, but doesn’t a Muslim woman’s hijab/niqab/burqa also do that? I don’t think it matters that being Muslim is not a job, or that she would be given less esteem than a nun; her clothing has the same effect.
Do all of you realize that Christians, well basically all non-muslims are considered unclean to the Muslim?
Good points, but I was sharing the picture in comparison with 1st century Palestinian women…slightly off-topic, I supposeHer face is not covered as with a face veil and burka.
She can be identified.
For a person that reads lips she would be easy to understand.
We can read her facial expressions- the calm peace radiating from her.
How do you read facial expressions of a covered face?
Many times on-line there are misunderstandings because we can not see the persons face- just read their words.
Well if movies such as Passion of the Christ are any indication, that’s hardly Palestinian. Furthermore, to say that it is something Mary would wear is to ignore the fact that all women back then pretty much dressed the same way.http://sttheresedelisieux-wellington.myownparish.com/images/sttherese.gif
How about this nun?I’m not properly sure whether the Carmelite habit is a derivation of 1st century Palestinian garb, but honestly, I don’t see any salient difference. Yes, certain parts of the habit have symbolic value to the order and to the individual, but I, for one, am completely ignorant of any of that. I just see a woman dressed as I assume Mary would dress.
I’d go as far as to actually call it a cultural uniform. Regardless, it no longer has any to do with modesty and everything to do with, well, culture. With that in mind, you also should consider that cultures clash at some point. If anybody walks past me in any of these clothes, modesty would be the last thing running through my head:I can acknowledge that a nun’s habit functions as a sort of uniform, but doesn’t a Muslim woman’s hijab/niqab/burqa also do that? I don’t think it matters that being Muslim is not a job, or that she would be given less esteem than a nun; her clothing has the same effect.
I wonder if the lower image could be considered as modest as the top. It was Asher Levines "twisted and Fringed"cassock from 2010’s Fall Fashion Week.