I was speaking to a coptic orthodox Christian and he explained to me that the moment when Jesus was on the cross and cried out “My God, my God why have you forsaken me” (again from the movie

) that at *this *moment God turned away from Jesus for just a few moments b/c Jesus was bearing all this sin. So, from what I gather, this is a separation. What is your view on this?
Wrong. This is NOT what Coptic Orthodox Christians believe about that statement.
Taken from H.H. Pope Shenouda III book, “The Seven Words of Our Lord on the Cross” (p43-44), this is what he wrote about that statement:
**
The Fourth Word
"My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?" (Matt.
27:46).
This statement does not mean a separation of the divine
nature of Jesus Christ from His human nature, nor does it
mean that the Father has forsaken the Son. It means rather
that the Father has allowed Him to be tormented.
His divine nature and His human nature were never separated
for a single moment or a wink of the eye. That is what we firmly
believe in and what we recite in the Holy Mass… If ever His
divine nature deserted Him, His redemption could never have
been considered as infinite, rendering infinite salvation, capable
of atoning for the sins of all humanity throughout the ages.
Thus, there was no rupture between His divine and human
nature.
As for His relationship with the Father, the Father did not
forsake Him. Let us only consider this verse:
"Believe Me that I
am in the Father, and the Father in Me" (John 14:1l).
What is the meaning then of, "Why have You forsaken
Me?"
It does not mean a separation; it indicates only that the
Father did allow that He should suffer; that He should bear the
blame and suffer God’s wrath over sin. That goes for the
emotional torment He underwent. As for the physical pain; God
allowed that He should suffer physically though God, in His
omnipotence, could have made Him insensible to pain. But, if
that had happened, the Crucifixion would have been null and
void - for pain would never have been experienced and
consequently, no penalty has been inflicted, no acquittal effected
and no redemption accomplished…
Thus, the Father allowed that the Son should suffer, and
the Son accepted that ordinance and was also afflicted by
it. In fact Christ came to the world for that particular
reason… It was a rupture that both parties preconceived
and agreed to… for the sake of humanity, and the Divine
Justice…
God allowed that Jesus should suffer, sacrifice Himself and
be tortured but did not break away from Him… It was not a
separation but rather a dispensation. God suffered that His Son
should suffer but still loved him fully,
"Yet it pleased the Lord
to bruise Him" (Is. 53:10).
An example that may make the meaning easy to grasp:
Suppose a parent accompanied his child to the hospital for
an operation, let us say for the removal of an abscess; that the
parent was holding the child’s hand while the surgeon went on
with his incision. The child would then start to cry and plead
with his father not to let that happen to him saying to him,
"Why did you forsake me? "
In fact, the father did not desert his child, he only allowed
him to suffer since the operation was for his own good and he
had only total care and love for his child.
This incident, I would say, demonstrates how that could be
considered abandonment without actual severance of ties.
The word "Forsaken " means that the torment of
Crucifixion was actual and that God’s wrath was
excruciating… The act of abandonment was the climax of all
torment on the Cross; all torment of redemption… Here Christ
resembles a burnt sacrifice. An offering to God for the
atonement of sin - to be consumed by the divine fire until it
turns to ashes and satisfies fully the Divine Justice…
**
There is more written on this statement, which I cannot fit all of it here, but I just wanted to make it crystal clear that we do not believe that this statement means seperation.
You either a) Misunderstood the Copt you spoke with; b) The Copt misunderstood the meaning; or c) You twisted the Copts words to suit you.
Hopefully it’s not option (c)!
This is the site of H.H. Pope Shenouda’s book, which explains the meanings behind what Christ said while on the cross:
tasbeha.org/content/hh_books/svnwrds/index.html
Let me know if you have any questions.
God Bless,
Elizabeth