Israel 'ready for escalation' of Gaza conflict

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, who’s land is it? Who has the rightful claim?
And what methods can be used to justly obtain it?

Certainly the honorable thing to do would be to negotiate compromise.
Michael, since you mention negotiating compromise, do you see this happening in this particular conflict?
If you have any idea of how you would foster negotiation and peace,I would appreciate your (name removed by moderator)ut.
I think this would be moving foward.
Thanks
 
Michael, since you mention negotiating compromise, do you see this happening in this particular conflict?
If you have any idea of how you would foster negotiation and peace,I would appreciate your (name removed by moderator)ut.
I think this would be moving foward.
Thanks
As Golda Meir said peace will never come until Palestinians come to love their Children more than they hate the Jews.
 
As Golda Meir said peace will never come until Palestinians come to love their Children more than they hate the Jews.
I understand.
Imagine for a while those children in the war zone on both sides are kids you know. Would you make a genuine effort to try and come out with a hopeful answer?
I mean,let’s say you could and would, any little beam of hope,what would you suggest for the sake of peace,estesbob?
thanks
 
I understand.
Imagine for a while those children in the war zone on both sides are kids you know. Would you make a genuine effort to try and come out with a hopeful answer?
I mean,let’s say you could and would, any little beam of hope,what would you suggest for the sake of peace,estesbob?
thanks
I would say until the Palestinians acknowledge Israel’s right to exist no peace is possible.
 
I would say until the Palestinians acknowledge Israel’s right to exist no peace is possible.
And there it is.

When Egypt recognized Israel, there was peace.
When Jordan recognized Israel, there was peace.

Funny how that happens.

Jon
 
Glad to hear I have been forgiven.🙂
Yes, I live 10/14 hours flight from you.
The American or South American chat is not really relevant. It was only meant for the purpose of illustrating that narratives can be really even opposite stories over one word…and the issue of conflict over identity.

I appreciate historical references,and I have been reading too.

Peace and thank you,7Sorrows.
It was relevant for me to understand what you meant! 🙂
As someone who taught english as a second language you seem to have a good command of english.
 
Now they live in slums.
They live in slums entirely by their own choice. To move out of them removes a powerful propaganda tool. There is already a Palestinian state in Jordan right next door. They’ve been offered another state multiple times and have turned it down every single time responding with terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians after each offer. Doesn’t serve the interest of those in power to have the conflict end. Then they have to take responsibility for the plight of their people instead of blaming someone else.
 
Israel is the occupier, and has been illegally since shortly after WWII. The Palestinians had been living there for hundreds of years before they were invaded. And then after they invade, they treat the Palestinians as third-class citizen. They were driven from their homes. And people are surprised that they’re angry and desperate? I am no advocate for violence—certainly not terrorism—but half of those being bombed by the Israelis are civilians, and half of them are children.

Unfortunately, our news media is generally biased toward Israel in their reporting. (We’re all familiar with media bias) I urge you all to try to see how much the Palestinians have been oppressed over the past few decades.

Here’s one source…in general, it’s too liberal for me, but when it comes to Palestine, they’re reporting that which most other media establishments ignore.

democracynow.org/topics/palestine
The State of Israel was recognized by the United Nations in 1948 and it’s existence is legal by every single standard of international law. No one can deny that. The new nation was then immediately attacked by the combined armies of Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq with the intention of pushing the Israelis into the sea and exterminating them. Over the course of multiple, legal defensive wars in which Israel defended itself against multiple Arab armies it captured various territories. Capturing enemy territories in defensive wars is legal under any and all international legal standards. No one can deny that. Israel then began to negotiate with the aggressors for the return of captured territories in exchange for peace.

In the case of Gaza and the West Bank the Palestinians there have been offered a contiguous state with Jerusalem as it’s capital. They turned it down. The reason is the majority of Palestinians really want the destruction of the State of Israel, not a two state solution with both parties living peacefully side by side. Until that changes there are no prospects for peace and the Palestinian people are responsible for every single child killed as a result of their aggression and the Israels completely legal measures taken to protect it’s citizens.
 
The State of Israel was recognized by the United Nations in 1948 and it’s existence is legal by every single standard of international law. No one can deny that. The new nation was then immediately attacked by the combined armies of Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq with the intention of pushing the Israelis into the sea and exterminating them. Over the course of multiple, legal defensive wars in which Israel defended itself against multiple Arab armies it captured various territories. Capturing enemy territories in defensive wars is legal under any and all international legal standards. No one can deny that. Israel then began to negotiate with the aggressors for the return of captured territories in exchange for peace.

In the case of Gaza and the West Bank the Palestinians there have been offered a contiguous state with Jerusalem as it’s capital. They turned it down. The reason is the majority of Palestinians really want the destruction of the State of Israel, not a two state solution with both parties living peacefully side by side. Until that changes there are no prospects for peace and the Palestinian people are responsible for every single child killed as a result of their aggression and the Israels completely legal measures taken to protect it’s citizens.
Jordan was set up at the same time-funny no ones calls them illegitimate. Jordan was supposed to be the Palestinian State but it serves the tyrants in the middle east much better to keep the Palestinians crammed into slums and perpetually mad at Israel-keeps them and the citizens of the surrounding Arab Countries from realizing who is really abusing them
 
It’s not always necessary to go back to the 1940s to understand the current status of Israeli/Palestinian relations. I for one don’t believe that this conflict is unrelated to the failed peace talks or to the kidnapping of the Israeli teens. It just strains credulity to think, like the news seems to suggest, that this was a case of spontaneous/one-sided combustion with no particular trigger. Regardless of who is right or wrong, or who the land belongs/belonged to, I believe it is possible to take a stand that the ongoing harming of children and innocent civilians is to be condemned no matter who does it or why.

To those who believe this is about land and ownership, I say it is much deeper than that: it is a refusal on both sides to acknowledge the EQUAL value of all lives concerned. That is the fundamental issue. If a person believes that one life on their side, is equal to 10 or 100 on the other side, that is the single essential ingredient for unending war because then war becomes a math formula and not a moral quandary…

I’m also highly skeptical of much of the ‘information’ coming out of that side of the world because much of the time it seems like canned propaganda - regardless of which side is speaking.
 
Jordan was set up at the same time-funny no ones calls them illegitimate. Jordan was supposed to be the Palestinian State but it serves the tyrants in the middle east much better to keep the Palestinians crammed into slums and perpetually mad at Israel-keeps them and the citizens of the surrounding Arab Countries from realizing who is really abusing them
👍 to this post by estesbob and also posts by seraphim73.
 
It’s not always necessary to go back to the 1940s to understand the current status of Israeli/Palestinian relations. I for one don’t believe that this conflict is unrelated to the failed peace talks or to the kidnapping of the Israeli teens. It just strains credulity to think, like the news seems to suggest, that this was a case of spontaneous/one-sided combustion with no particular trigger. Regardless of who is right or wrong, or who the land belongs/belonged to, I believe it is possible to take a stand that the ongoing harming of children and innocent civilians is to be condemned no matter who does it or why.

To those who believe this is about land and ownership, I say it is much deeper than that: it is a refusal on both sides to acknowledge the EQUAL value of all lives concerned. That is the fundamental issue. If a person believes that one life on their side, is equal to 10 or 100 on the other side, that is the single essential ingredient for unending war because then war becomes a math formula and not a moral quandary…

I’m also highly skeptical of much of the ‘information’ coming out of that side of the world because much of the time it seems like canned propaganda - regardless of which side is speaking.
Again how do you negotiate with people who refuse to recognize your right to exist?
 
It’s not always necessary to go back to the 1940s to understand the current status of Israeli/Palestinian relations. I for one don’t believe that this conflict is unrelated to the failed peace talks or to the kidnapping of the Israeli teens. It just strains credulity to think, like the news seems to suggest, that this was a case of spontaneous/one-sided combustion with no particular trigger. Regardless of who is right or wrong, or who the land belongs/belonged to,** I believe it is possible to take a stand that the ongoing harming of children and innocent civilians is to be condemned no matter who does it or why. **

To those who believe this is about land and ownership, I say it is much deeper than that: it is a refusal on both sides to acknowledge the EQUAL value of all lives concerned. That is the fundamental issue. If a person believes that one life on their side, is equal to 10 or 100 on the other side, that is the single essential ingredient for unending war because then war becomes a math formula and not a moral quandary…

I’m also highly skeptical of much of the ‘information’ coming out of that side of the world because much of the time it seems like canned propaganda - regardless of which side is speaking.
I agree with the bolded, and as far as I know, that stance has been taken in international law, that military personnel are not to hide themselves or weaponry among civilian populations. Hamas has to be held accountable for what amounts to war crimes against, oddly enough, their own people.

Jon
 
Again how do you negotiate with people who refuse to recognize your right to exist?
A country is not a person. I have heard of refusal to recognize the existence of the ***state ***of Israel, but never refusal to recognize the right of existence of the Jews as a people. I stand open to correction, if that is a inaccurate understanding of the facts.

I have to believe that since greater people than me, including our Pope and previous US presidents/secretaries of state, seem to all at some time or the other have believed in the potential of peace talks - the situation is not hopeless.

No quarrel is entirely one-sided either: wasn’t it Golda Meir who apparently refused to recognize the existence of any such people called Palestinians? If a country can be re-created (Israel), why not a people (Palestinians)?

The West has done a great disservice by trying to walk two paths with regard to this conflict: trying to make peace while taking sides (US: Israel, Europe: Palestinians - at least in part). Credibility as a peace maker involves at least the appearance of impartiality.
 
A country is not a person. I have heard of refusal to recognize the existence of the ***state ***of Israel, but never refusal to recognize the right of existence of the Jews as a people. I stand open to correction, if that is a inaccurate understanding of the facts.

I have to believe that since greater people than me, including our Pope and previous US presidents/secretaries of state, seem to all at some time or the other have believed in the potential of peace talks - the situation is not hopeless.

No quarrel is entirely one-sided either: wasn’t it Golda Meir who apparently refused to recognize the existence of any such people called Palestinians? If a country can be re-created (Israel), why not a people (Palestinians)?

The West has done a great disservice by trying to walk two paths with regard to this conflict: trying to make peace while taking sides (US: Israel, Europe: Palestinians - at least in part). Credibility as a peace maker involves at least the appearance of impartiality.
A distinction without a difference. Again how do you negotiate a settlement with a people who deny you right to existence?
 
I agree with the bolded, and as far as I know, that stance has been taken in international law, that military personnel are not to hide themselves or weaponry among civilian populations. Hamas has to be held accountable for what amounts to war crimes against, oddly enough, their own people.

Jon
Both sides have to take responsibility. Israel has a history of disproportionate responses, partly I believe, because of the relative disproportional value accorded to lives on either side (see my comment above). One example is the recent “turning upside down of everything Palestinian” in response to the teens’ kidnapping, vs the more vastly more measured (and ironically, more successful) search, for the Palestinian kid’s murderer. If you are bigger, you have a greater responsibility to play fair - even children on the playground know that.
 
A distinction without a difference. Again how do you negotiate a settlement with a people who deny you right to existence?
So are you of the school that sees any criticism of the State of Israel as an anti-Semitic attack? Obama must wish he was Jewish and the leader of Israel instead…😉
 
Both sides have to take responsibility. Israel has a history of disproportionate responses, partly I believe, because of the relative disproportional value accorded to lives on either side (see my comment above). One example is the recent “turning upside down of everything Palestinian” in response to the teens’ kidnapping, vs the more vastly more measured (and ironically, more successful) search, for the Palestinian kid’s murderer. If you are bigger, you have a greater responsibility to play fair - even children on the playground know that.
So what is a proportionate response to having 70 to 80 rockets a day launched at you? Funny you should mention the response to the murder of teenagers-Hamas praised the kidnapping of Israeli teens-Israel quickly arrested the murderers of the Palestinian teen. There simply is no moral equivalence between the two sides. Were the situation reversed the Palestinians would have long since wiped Israel off the face of the earth-as they already tried to twice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top