Jehovah's witnesses still dont have an accurate translation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hellisreal
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
BibleSteve said:
Congratulations Hellisreal,

In the course of multiple conversations, I saw saw a point that was complete off topic and unsubstantiated by scripture and I pointed that out in post #190. I didn’t look carefully who was speaking to me.

Thank you for focusssing on that point in lieu of any other content that was being discussed.

You have found the plank in my eye…

Excellent, way to go!
Click to expand...
you knew steve who you were talking to. stop trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes. :rolleyes:
 
Please read again the first line of my post, the one that starts out ’ “I REQUIRE NO SCRIPTURAL VALIDATION FOR THE MIRACLE OF THE STAR.”
Click to expand...
Got it loud and clear. You require no Scriptural support for what you believe. You form opinions that are completely undiscussed in Scripture and insult other who note that the scriptures don’t comment on your belief.
 
You could start off with admitting you lied to Jehovah when you commited the sin of speaking to an “apostate” and admitted here you did. And told us you would “be more careful”

How do you define careful?

You know darn well TC is going to post here.

There is a feature here called “ignore”

But, since you make your own rules, and do not read the rules of this Catholic forum you love to post on to promote your religion, you feel you are above all that.

Put TC on ignore, if you really cant respond to TC.

I have a feeling you were not intending on being careful,

Is this how a JW is careful of important things?
BibleSteve said:
Congratulations Hellisreal,

In the course of multiple conversations, I saw saw a point that was complete off topic and unsubstantiated by scripture and I pointed that out in post #190. I didn’t look carefully who was speaking to me.

Thank you for focusssing on that point in lieu of any other content that was being discussed.

You have found the plank in my eye…

Excellent, way to go!
Click to expand...
 
BibleSteve said:
Someone else brought up the topic of the rosary… I simple responded to that comment.
Click to expand...
it was inappropriate. the rosary was not mentioned in any way to merit the attack on Mary. If anything the rosary was mentioned in reference to the crucifix on it and how JWs feel this is a demonized symbol.
 
BibleSteve said:
Someone else brought up the topic of the rosary… I simple responded to that comment.
Click to expand...
Hmm that was a caustic comment - not a discussion.- lets be honest here you saw a opening to spread some anti catholic venom and you took it . Naughty, naughty-fibbing again:mad:
 
BibleSteve said:
Got it loud and clear. You require no Scriptural support for what you believe. You form opinions that are completely undiscussed in Scripture and insult other who note that the scriptures don’t comment on your belief.
Click to expand...
REAL scriptures do not condemn any Catholic belief system. Maybe the NWT does. But then again every other Bible condemns the JW belief system or else you wuld not have had to make your own Bible.

addendum: however the Greek Interlinear NWT also condemns the JW belief system as is proven by the scan of the page I made in my other thread that is being pretty much ignored…LOL
 
juliamajor said:
Hmm that was a caustic comment - not a discussion.- lets be honest here you saw a opening to spread some anti catholic venom and you took it . Naughty, naughty-fibbing again:mad:
Click to expand...
You brought up the topic of rosary in post #186 I simply commented with a scriptural discussion on the topic.
 
BibleSteve said:
Got it loud and clear. You require no Scriptural support for what you believe. You form opinions that are completely undiscussed in Scripture and insult other who note that the scriptures don’t comment on your belief.
Click to expand...
How do the scriptures speak of your telling us you will not talk to “apostates” and for some reason you cant put them on ignore, and for some reason you respond to them and you are okay with Jehovah now?

You are so busy trying to promote your religion you ignore the book of Romans and do not reply to my post on that.

You are so busy trying to be right you sin blissfully in front of us all.

You end up having to aplogize to a poster here who you knocked repeatedly.

Very credible.

The spirit is in you, but I am undecided about what spirit it is.
 
Ravyn_Guiliani said:
it was inappropriate. the rosary was not mentioned in any way to merit the attack on Mary. If anything the rosary was mentioned in reference to the crucifix on it and how JWs feel this is a demonized symbol.
Click to expand...
The topic of the rosary was brought up completely out of the blue in post #186. I simply pointed out scriptures related to the topic.

There was no attack on Mary or anyone else.

Mary is to be totally respected as the Mother of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

That doesn’t mean there is any Scriptural justification for the practice of the Rosary.
 
BibleSteve said:
You brought up the topic of rosary in post #186 I simply commented with a scriptural discussion on the topic.
Click to expand...
oh please- it wasn’t a topic IT WAS A A SARCASM! So please at least be upfront with your vile :mad: propaganda.
 
Hellisreal said:
How do the scriptures speak of your telling us you will not talk to “apostates” and for some reason you cant put them on ignore, and for some reason you respond to them and you are okay with Jehovah now?

You are so busy trying to promote your religion you ignore the book of Romans and do not reply to my post on that.

You are so busy trying to be right you sin blissfully in front of us all.

You end up having to aplogize to a poster here who you knocked repeatedly.

Very credible.

The spirit is in you, but I am undecided about what spirit it is.
Click to expand...
OK, I’ll be looking how to use the ignore function.

I love it… I accidently type the word Jerusalem instead of Bethlehem and I apoligize for the simple mistake.

Hellisreal then feels the need to slam me for this simple keyboard mistake…

Love it…
 
BibleSteve said:
OK, I’ll be looking how to use the ignore function.

I love it… I accidently type the word Jerusalem instead of Bethlehem and I apoligize for the simple mistake.

Hellisreal then feels the need to slam me for this simple keyboard mistake…

Love it…
Click to expand...
umm, its almost impossible to have a typo of that magnitude:rolleyes: ignore function, lower left hand side in your profile:D
 
BibleSteve said:
Got it loud and clear. You require no Scriptural support for what you believe. You form opinions that are completely undiscussed in Scripture and insult other who note that the scriptures don’t comment on your belief.
Click to expand...
Do not attempt to twist my words. I made that comment with reference to the miracle of the star, nothing else. You seem to have a sick fascination with satanic intervention, could it be that the Adversary has a proprietary interest in the affairs of the Watchtower?
 
BibleSteve said:
OK, I’ll be looking how to use the ignore function.

I love it… I accidently type the word Jerusalem instead of Bethlehem and I apoligize for the simple mistake.

Hellisreal then feels the need to slam me for this simple keyboard mistake…

Love it…
Click to expand...
How many times did your keyboard malfunction tonight?:confused:
 
hosemonkey said:
Do not attempt to twist my words. I made that comment with reference to the miracle of the star, nothing else. You seem to have a sick fascination with satanic intervention, could it be that the Adversary has a proprietary interest in the affairs of the Watchtower?
Click to expand...
BS seems to forget that when the bible does not say something about who or what the star was -it means it was unimportant and not germane:mad:
 
awwww give Steve a break! he is talking to me too! Technically he should not be on this forum at all and we all know he is counting his time talking to us.
 
Ravyn_Guiliani said:
awwww give Steve a break! he is talking to me too! Technically he should not be on this forum at all and we all know he is counting his time talking to us.
Click to expand...
hey, no prob. but if we have to defend the faith which is what we are doing, then well, we have an obligation to show him the truth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top