Jeremiah Wright: We need control

  • Thread starter Thread starter markomalley
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

markomalley

Guest
The reason I’m posting this thread is not because I’m terribly concerned with Rev. Wright’s words, which aren’t terribly newsworthy in of themselves, but because of the fact that those words were published in the Politico…a left-of-center publication. This type of thing would be expected in the Daily Caller…not the Politico…

From Politico:
President Barack Obama’s former spiritual adviser spoke just a few miles from the White House on Sunday, and politics and controversy weren’t far from what Rev. Jeremiah Wright had to say.

“As we celebrate the foundations of our future, this is not a time to romanticize because we have the first African-descended president in the White House,” Wright said in a fiery sermon that lasted close to an hour. “You see what the tea party is trying to do.”

(snip)

Wright also blasted people who he described as “biscuits” and “sheep dogs” — African Americans raised in the white world.

“Take that baby, him or her away, from the African mother, away from the African community, away from the African experience … and put them Africans over at the breasts of Yale, Harvard, University of Chicago … UCLA or UC-Berkeley,” he said. “Turn them into biscuits. Let them get that alien DNA all up inside their brain and they will turn on their own people in defense of the ones who are keeping their own people under oppression. Sheep dogs.”

“There’s white racist DNA running through the synapses of his or her brain tissue. They will kill their own kind, defend the enemies of their kind or anyone who is perceived to be the enemy of the milky white way of life.”
I could imagine right wing rags highlighting Rev. Wright’s words, but I fail to understand why Politico would highlight Wright’s words…particularly in an election year.

I could see if Obama was being primaried by a “more progressive” candidate…but that’s not the case.

Any thoughts?
 
Wow… what a racist piece of work. And by work i’m talking about the work I have to pick up after my dogs in the backyard.
The reason I’m posting this thread is not because I’m terribly concerned with Rev. Wright’s words, which aren’t terribly newsworthy in of themselves, but because of the fact that those words were published in the Politico…a left-of-center publication. This type of thing would be expected in the Daily Caller…not the Politico…

From Politico:President Barack Obama’s former spiritual adviser spoke just a few miles from the White House on Sunday, and politics and controversy weren’t far from what Rev. Jeremiah Wright had to say.

“As we celebrate the foundations of our future, this is not a time to romanticize because we have the first African-descended president in the White House,” Wright said in a fiery sermon that lasted close to an hour. “You see what the tea party is trying to do.”

(snip)

Wright also blasted people who he described as “biscuits” and “sheep dogs” — African Americans raised in the white world.

“Take that baby, him or her away, from the African mother, away from the African community, away from the African experience … and put them Africans over at the breasts of Yale, Harvard, University of Chicago … UCLA or UC-Berkeley,” he said. “Turn them into biscuits. Let them get that alien DNA all up inside their brain and they will turn on their own people in defense of the ones who are keeping their own people under oppression. Sheep dogs.”

“There’s white racist DNA running through the synapses of his or her brain tissue. They will kill their own kind, defend the enemies of their kind or anyone who is perceived to be the enemy of the milky white way of life.”I could imagine right wing rags highlighting Rev. Wright’s words, but I fail to understand why Politico would highlight Wright’s words…particularly in an election year.

I could see if Obama was being primaried by a “more progressive” candidate…but that’s not the case.

Any thoughts?
 
Wow… what a racist piece of work. And by work i’m talking about the work I have to pick up after my dogs in the backyard.
Jeremiah Wright is Jeremiah Wright…he’s not likely to change anytime soon.

The question is not why does Jeremiah Wright act as he does…the more important (and newsworthy) question is to ask why a left-wing rag like Politico would highlight his statements during an election year…
 
Jeremiah Wright is Jeremiah Wright…he’s not likely to change anytime soon.
True enuff.
The question is not why does Jeremiah Wright act as he does…the more important (and newsworthy) question is to ask why a left-wing rag like Politico would highlight his statements during an election year…
To get the black community to go on offensive against the ppl the no honor Wright ?
 
Jeremiah Wright is Jeremiah Wright…he’s not likely to change anytime soon.

The question is not why does Jeremiah Wright act as he does…the more important (and newsworthy) question is to ask why a left-wing rag like Politico would highlight his statements during an election year…
Maybe because the Politico, like Wright, thinks there’s nothing wrong with what he said. 🙂
 
just more proof that his church is in no way a Christian church. More of a anti-white gathering place. Got news for rev. wrong, this white boy isn’t going anywhere.
 
The reason I’m posting this thread is not because I’m terribly concerned with Rev. Wright’s words, which aren’t terribly newsworthy in of themselves, but because of the fact that those words were published in the Politico…a left-of-center publication. This type of thing would be expected in the Daily Caller…not the Politico…

From Politico:
President Barack Obama’s former spiritual adviser spoke just a few miles from the White House on Sunday, and politics and controversy weren’t far from what Rev. Jeremiah Wright had to say.

“As we celebrate the foundations of our future, this is not a time to romanticize because we have the first African-descended president in the White House,” Wright said in a fiery sermon that lasted close to an hour. “You see what the tea party is trying to do.”

(snip)

Wright also blasted people who he described as “biscuits” and “sheep dogs” — African Americans raised in the white world.

“Take that baby, him or her away, from the African mother, away from the African community, away from the African experience … and put them Africans over at the breasts of Yale, Harvard, University of Chicago … UCLA or UC-Berkeley,” he said. “Turn them into biscuits. Let them get that alien DNA all up inside their brain and they will turn on their own people in defense of the ones who are keeping their own people under oppression. Sheep dogs.”

“There’s white racist DNA running through the synapses of his or her brain tissue. They will kill their own kind, defend the enemies of their kind or anyone who is perceived to be the enemy of the milky white way of life.”
I could imagine right wing rags highlighting Rev. Wright’s words, but I fail to understand why Politico would highlight Wright’s words…particularly in an election year.

I could see if Obama was being primaried by a “more progressive” candidate…but that’s not the case.

Any thoughts?
My first thought is “Jeremiah Wright is a racist idiot”. I am ashamed that I share heritage as a Navy Hospital Corpsman with this race baiting hate pimp.
 
just more proof that his church is in no way a Christian church. More of a anti-white gathering place. Got news for rev. wrong, this white boy isn’t going anywhere.
One wonders why Obama did not get up and leave but sat there with his family listening to these rants. Guess Obama wasn’t a bisquit or a sheep dog so what is he?
 
One wonders why Obama did not get up and leave but sat there with his family listening to these rants. Guess Obama wasn’t a bisquit or a sheep dog so what is he?
An atheist marxist. I’m serious. I believe 100% that our president does not believe in God. I still wanna hurl massive chunks knowing Notre Dame allowed him to speak there. God bless Alan Keyes for the witness he gave in protest.
 
An atheist marxist. I’m serious. I believe 100% that our president does not believe in God. I still wanna hurl massive chunks knowing Notre Dame allowed him to speak there. God bless Alan Keyes for the witness he gave in protest.
I examine the public record of his life and I come to the same conclusion.
 
An atheist marxist. I’m serious. I believe 100% that our president does not believe in God. I still wanna hurl massive chunks knowing Notre Dame allowed him to speak there. God bless Alan Keyes for the witness he gave in protest.
My thoughts in 08 too!! 👍 And I wrote to ND when that fiasco happened. :mad:
 
I believe this is helpful. People should hear more of this, this is the pastor who guided the President for 20 years.
 
  1. President Obama had denied that this minister was every his “spiritual adviser.” He could be lying, but a good Catholic will not accuse a fellow human being of being a liar unless he has definitive proof of that. Otherwise, the sin of Calumny has been committed. That’s a mortal sin leading to eternal death of the soul unless repented of before leaving life in this world. See: newadvent.org/cathen/03190c.htm
  2. President Obama made a speech in 2008 in which made clear that he does not agree with Rev. Wright’s radical views on race and class issues. See: slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2008/03/the_full_obama.html
  3. President Obama could be the worst president in history, even worse than President Polk. Who knows. But making President Obama responsible for what Rev. Wright says is like making every conservative politicians responsible for the white racists who have ever had any connection with them (lists of such persons are collected on left wing web sites).
  4. Since Rev. Wright is not a Catholic, since President Obama is not a Catholic, and since Rev. Wright made no comment about Catholics or Catholicism, I respectfully submit that this thread seems to have nothing to do with Catholic Answers and seems better suited for a politic-oriented web forum.
 
  1. President Obama had denied that this minister was every his “spiritual adviser.” He could be lying, but a good Catholic will not accuse a fellow human being of being a liar unless he has definitive proof of that. Otherwise, the sin of Calumny has been committed. That’s a mortal sin leading to eternal death of the soul unless repented of before leaving life in this world. See: newadvent.org/cathen/03190c.htm
  2. President Obama made a speech in 2008 in which made clear that he does not agree with Rev. Wright’s radical views on race and class issues. See: slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2008/03/the_full_obama.html
The problem I have is that Obama attended Rev Wright’s ecclesial community for 20 years. It’s not that I think that Obama is somehow *responsible *for Wright’s comments, but that most Protestants tend to easily vote with their feet if they don’t like what they hear, so if Obama stayed, it seems that he wasn’t against what he was hearing. If he was, why would he keep going there?
 
just more proof that his church is in no way a Christian church. More of a anti-white gathering place. Got news for rev. wrong, this white boy isn’t going anywhere.
His statements are very strange: “There’s white racist DNA running through the synapses of his or her brain tissue.” Benjamin Jealous is also the president of the NAACP. It must be painful to feel rejected or classified due to the one drop rule.
 
His statements are very strange: “There’s white racist DNA running through the synapses of his or her brain tissue.” Benjamin Jealous is also the president of the NAACP. It must be painful to feel rejected or classified due to the one drop rule.
Sheesh! I’m darker than those dudes.
 
The problem I have is that Obama attended Rev Wright’s ecclesial community for 20 years. It’s not that I think that Obama is somehow *responsible *for Wright’s comments, but that most Protestants tend to easily vote with their feet if they don’t like what they hear, so if Obama stayed, it seems that he wasn’t against what he was hearing. If he was, why would he keep going there?
I have heard that records show that Barack Obama was a very irregular attender at that church.

I think he associated with that church just a little for the political advantages it gave him.

So, which is worst, to be an unbalanced radical like Rev. Wright, or a political opportunist?

If political opportunists were banned from public office, nearly all them would have to resign!

My take on President Obama is that he is kind of like President Lincoln, with one foot in the Christian faith and one foot out of it, seeing much good in it, yet having real doubts about whether it is really true or not.

When running for the U.S. House of Representatives in 1846 his opponent, a Methodist minister, publicly accused Lincoln of being an atheist. Lincoln printed a handbill which gave this “denial”:

That I am not a member of any Christian church is true; but I have never denied the truth of the Scriptures; and I have never spoken with intentional disrespect of religion in general, or of any denomination of Christians in particular… I do not think I could myself be brought to support a man for office whom I knew to be an open enemy of, or scoffer at, religion.

This included in every biography of Lincoln. Here’s a web source: teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=753

Lincoln was a lawyer. All he really denies is that he has ever publicly criticized religion. If he’d been a Christian, you think he would have said so. For more on Lincoln’s religion, see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln_and_religion

So, President Obama may or may not be a Christian. If not, he’d join the ranks of President Lincoln, President Washington (he never of super rarely spoke or wrote of Jesus, only of “God” per his Freemasonic beliefs), President Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine, and so on.

But Rev. Wright imbalanced radical he is not. No one says that except for those launching sinfully calumnious attacks on him.
 
One wonders why Obama did not get up and leave but sat there with his family listening to these rants. Guess Obama wasn’t a bisquit or a sheep dog so what is he?
Because he was almost never in attendance, and the rants didn’t happen that often.

Still, he probably generally knew that Rev. Wright said some wacky things.

Yet, I have heard some Catholic priests and nuns say some wacky things in meetings. Am I responsible for them?

One priest openly denied in a homily that the miracle of the loaves and fishes occurred. I asked him about it after mass, and he got angry at me and stormed off. True story! He’s still a priest (at a different area parish).

My guess is that he is an atheist, based on that and other things he said while at our parish. But it would be a sin for me to state publicly my theory that he is an atheist!
 
An atheist marxist. I’m serious. I believe 100% that our president does not believe in God. I still wanna hurl massive chunks knowing Notre Dame allowed him to speak there. God bless Alan Keyes for the witness he gave in protest.
How can anyone say that they know that President Obama does not believe in God?

Is there a tape of him confession his atheism? Are there witnesses of him blaspheming against God?

Since no one can know whether he is truly believer or an infidel, it is the sin of Calumny to say that he is an atheist. See: newadvent.org/cathen/03190c.htm

The sin of Calumny is at least as bad as the sin of Atheism.
 
Is there a thread on Romney, Mormonism and Joseph Smith yet?

:cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top