A
austenbosten
Guest
That’s where you lost me. Obama is nothing like those great leaders. :nope:I have heard that records show that Barack Obama was a very irregular attender at that church.
I think he associated with that church just a little for the political advantages it gave him.
So, which is worst, to be an unbalanced radical like Rev. Wright, or a political opportunist?
If political opportunists were banned from public office, nearly all them would have to resign!
My take on President Obama is that he is kind of like President Lincoln, with one foot in the Christian faith and one foot out of it, seeing much good in it, yet having real doubts about whether it is really true or not.
When running for the U.S. House of Representatives in 1846 his opponent, a Methodist minister, publicly accused Lincoln of being an atheist. Lincoln printed a handbill which gave this “denial”:
That I am not a member of any Christian church is true; but I have never denied the truth of the Scriptures; and I have never spoken with intentional disrespect of religion in general, or of any denomination of Christians in particular… I do not think I could myself be brought to support a man for office whom I knew to be an open enemy of, or scoffer at, religion.
This included in every biography of Lincoln. Here’s a web source: teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=753
Lincoln was a lawyer. All he really denies is that he has ever publicly criticized religion. If he’d been a Christian, you think he would have said so. For more on Lincoln’s religion, see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln_and_religion
So, President Obama may or may not be a Christian. If not, he’d join the ranks of President Lincoln, President Washington (he never of super rarely spoke or wrote of Jesus, only of “God” per his Freemasonic beliefs, President Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine, and so on.
But Rev. Wright imbalanced radical he is not. No one says that except for those launching sinfully calumnious attacks on him.