R
Rabbity
Guest
Jesus did say to heal the sick. Was he against universal health care?
Which would include paying taxes…I took that verse as meaning take care of all your earthly business so that you can give all that you have to me.
Good Post.Jesus did preach a love-filled sharing frugality. Nowhere does Jesus say that wealth is anything but trouble.
Jesus tells us that we are to embrace poverty. Poverty is not being willing to give if called upon to do so, and it is not mere emotional detachment to created things. Neither is poverty destitution, although Jesus does call a select few to radical destitution.
Poverty is actual, factual frugality, and that is what Jesus taught.
This isn’t a popular position to take, even among Catholics, but I would urge anyone who wants to understand Gospel poverty as it was really preached by Jesus to read “Happy Are You Poor” by Fr. Thomas Dubay.
-Tim-
You mean the same UHC that provides free abortions, contraceptions, and leads to overall lower healthcare quality…Yes. Jesus said heal the sick…He didn’t say “sit on your fat [behind] and let the government take over.” He said “Hey schmuck do some good, be like the good Samaritan and help your fellow man.”Jesus did say to heal the sick. Was he against universal health care?
They don’t exist anymore because their welfare state bankrupted them.Latin is a dead language,
As dead as dead can be.
First it killed the Romans,
And now it’s killing me!
Not according to the original poster that we are deconstructing. That was my point. By singling out Republicans, the poster is indirectly stating that Democrats don’t go to church. I’m sure this would be news to yourself and many other Democrats.Im a Democrat and I go to church , and pray the rosary everyday
My retort for the poster:
Jesus commands us to help the poor.
Jesus didn’t command us to setup a massive bureaucratic government with confiscatory tax policies, that then uses those proceeds to fund political benefactors with the remaining small amount used to help the poor.
Actually the sense of the “render unto Caesar” reply is not so much about the taxes (although the question was) but a reiteration of the idea that Yhwh is the true King who rules the land, not Caesar. Caesar is, at best, just some sort of puppet on strings, who only has power because God allows him to have it. Since, even the Roman emperor is merely but a small fish when compared to Yhwh, he can have his coin back: of more paramount importance is “the things that are God’s” and the interests of His kingdom, which is to be done “in earth as it is in heaven.”Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s is usually the verse seen as telling people to pay taxes…
Peace
James
I do not disagree with this.Actually the sense of the “render unto Caesar” reply is not so much about the taxes (although the question was) but a reiteration of the idea that Yhwh is the true King who rules the land, not Caesar. Caesar is, at best, just some sort of puppet on strings, who only has power because God allows him to have it. Since, even the Roman emperor is merely but a small fish when compared to Yhwh, he can have his coin back: of more paramount importance is “the things that are God’s” and the interests of His kingdom, which is to be done “in earth as it is in heaven.”
Ironically, Jesus is presented before Pilate as fomenting rebellion through tax evasion.
Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. And they began to accuse him, saying, “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.”
Not thinking and seeking, but doing.Good Post.
Although I might have said that Jesus taught about the dangers of wealth…But it says virtually the same thing that you have.
If I am reading you correctly, you are saying that “Gospel poverty” is thinking in terms of what one “needs” rather than what one “wants” - in so far as material, earthly things are concerned. This allows one to more fully pray, “Give us this day our daily bread…”, for one is seeking nothing more.
If such a person DOES find themselves with an excess of fund or material goods, this person seeks the best way to use them for God’s Glory - not his own.
At least that is how I see it.
Peace
James
Since they have no hope of perfection in the next life, they strive for perfection through compulsion in this life. And since we are a fallen race, the results will always fail, and often lead to Gulag and Einsatzgruppen.
How come atheists are more likely to be politically left-wing? Is that in the contract you have to sign when becoming atheist?
As if that’s going to workSince they have no hope of perfection in the next life, they strive for perfection through compulsion in this life. And since we are a fallen race, the results will always fail, and often lead to Gulag and Einsatzgruppen.
1 I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd giveth his life for his sheep.
12 But the hireling, and he that is not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and flieth: and the wolf catcheth, and scattereth the sheep:
13 And the hireling flieth, because he is a hireling: and he hath no care for the sheep.
14 I am the good shepherd; and I know mine, and mine know me.
Yes, quite right, but when your worldview is limited as the atheist worldview must be, and you’re seeking radical change, that’s all you’ve got to work with.As if that’s going to work
Besides, perfection through force and compulsion is an imperfection in itself.
Meh, if I’d have that worldview I’d rather try to enjoy everything to the fullest and not bother with change at all. But to each his own.Yes, quite right, but when your worldview is limited as the atheist worldview must be, and you’re seeking radical change, that’s all you’ve got to work with.
Speaking of making a simple thing complex…I do not disagree with this.
Indeed, when Jesus gave answers to questions he often did so in most surprising ways that forced or caused people to really think. So this single answer to the question about taxes has a number of implications.
Primary among these implications is a cleaving apart of the temporal and spiritual. The paying of the tax, even to an occupying, pagan government had no bearing on ones standing before God.
Jesus was conveying that this whole “tax” thing was but a small thing compared to matters of spirit and salvation and that those listening need to bear this in mind and not get sidetracked by details and matters (such as a tax revolt) that would only inflame their enemies and serve no good purpose.
Thus - besides all various other implications of His answer, Jesus did, in fact, tell them to pay the tax. Just not in so many words…
I love how different people pull different aspects out of something as simple as this one response from our Lord.
Peace
James