Jews as the Chosen people?

  • Thread starter Thread starter changecomes
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am aware of the differnce. Secret Jews whether they were false Catholics, or Catholics who wanted to maintain some of their Jewish traditions, does not give the church the right to torture people.
What does any of the sins of Man have to do with Christians becoming the chosen People of Christ.

Please do not let this turn into a battle of you did this, and they did that. If you want to begin with the sins of Man we should begin with ourself. Many horrible things were done in God’s name and that was not right. But it had nothing to do with our Lord or his Church.
 
Not only a POINT the only reason we are saved and by being saved have become the Chosen People.😃
 
The Inquisitions are often portrayed as The Church going after unbaptized Jews but such as not the case. The confusion comes in because in Jewish teaching, a Jew could be baptized a hundred times but he remains a Jew. In Catholic teaching, once someoneis baptized they become Catholic and are now under Church authority. So in the minds of the Jewish community, those baptized Jews were STILL JEWS and so they naturally see it as “the Church went after Jews”. The Church saw them as CATHOLICS who had apostasized.
On this account Torquemada urged the sovereigns to compel all the Jews either to become Christians or to leave Spain. To frustrate his designs the Jews agreed to pay the Spanish government 30,000 ducats if left unmolested. There is a tradition that when Ferdinand was about to yield to the enticing offer, Torquemada appeared before him, bearing a crucifix aloft, and exclaiming: “Judas Iscariot sold Christ for 30 pieces of silver; Your Highness is about to sell him for 30,000 ducats. Here He is; take Him and sell Him.” Leaving the crucifix on the table he left the room. Chiefly through his instrumentality the Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492.

Catholic Encyclopedia - Tomás de Torquemada
 
What does any of the sins of Man have to do with Christians becoming the chosen People of Christ.

Please do not let this turn into a battle of you did this, and they did that. If you want to begin with the sins of Man we should begin with ourself. Many horrible things were done in God’s name and that was not right. But it had nothing to do with our Lord or his Church.
My whole point is not to forget our sins committed in the past, or to brush them aside, but to avoid the same in the future. This is what the Catholic church has done since Vatican II, and they are to be commended for it, and not criticized for it.
 
My whole point is not to forget our sins committed in the past, or to brush them aside, but to avoid the same in the future. This is what the Catholic church has done since Vatican II, and they are to be commended for it, and not criticized for it.
But my point is, it is not the blame of the CC. IT was the People who made mistakes who were Catholic and brought the blame down on the Church.

Sure the Pope apologized for what the People did but on the same token the church is not responsible for the mistakes of Man.

And do you not agree that it is God who will deal with the sins of men that were commited just as he will deal with our sins.

And if the truth be said there was enough mistakes made on all sides. Not just some of the Church leaders.
 
But my point is, it is not the blame of the CC. IT was the People who made mistakes who were Catholic and brought the blame down on the Church.

Sure the Pope apologized for what the People did but on the same token the church is not responsible for the mistakes of Man.

And do you not agree that it is God who will deal with the sins of men that were commited just as he will deal with our sins.

And if the truth be said there was enough mistakes made on all sides. Not just some of the Church leaders.
I suppose we can differ about the definition of the ‘Church’, if it excludes the laity, there is some validity to what you are saying. Even if we define the ‘Church’ as the spiritual leaders of the church, the ‘Church’ is still not off the hook. There have been spiritual leaders of the Catholic church who committed crimes against the Jews. And yes, all of us laity and clergy combined have enough sin to go around. This is not a discussion of religious superiority over another, it is about facing the difficult truths about ourselves, and changing in whatever way we need to change.
 
How can anyone not love the Jewish People…you should define Jewish People; it’s as difficult as defining Christian and is highly politicized. I agree that Anti Zionism is likely a new guise of antisemitism. Besides, in our calling by Christ Jesus, we are advised and conditioned to love all people, sincere Jewish and Gentile Christians without bias, just as Jesus did.

I personally wonder if so much talk about Chosen People is not maudlin and inviting of antisemitism in much the same way it invites rhetoric against the Church.

Romans 2:28-29 as you must know
 
I am aware of the difference. Secret Jews whether they were false Catholics, or Catholics who wanted to maintain some of their Jewish traditions, does not give the church the right to torture people. Did it give the Catholic King of Spain the right to expel all Jews from Spain on the 9th of Av, in about 1490? Where was the Catholic church when Catholic temporal rulers were making these type of decisions?
Times were very different then. There was no such thing as separation of church and state (an American belief, btw). And the Jews were expelled from Spain on Aug. 3rd, 1492 (I know because some of my mother’s ancestors were Sephardic Jews who were in that number.)

Popes spoke out against what Catholic monarchs did in such cases, but the Popes were not always heeded.
 
On this account Torquemada urged the sovereigns to compel all the Jews either to become Christians or to leave Spain. To frustrate his designs the Jews agreed to pay the Spanish government 30,000 ducats if left unmolested. There is a tradition that when Ferdinand was about to yield to the enticing offer, Torquemada appeared before him, bearing a crucifix aloft, and exclaiming: “Judas Iscariot sold Christ for 30 pieces of silver; Your Highness is about to sell him for 30,000 ducats. Here He is; take Him and sell Him.” Leaving the crucifix on the table he left the room. Chiefly through his instrumentality the Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492.

Catholic Encyclopedia - Tomás de Torquemada
I’m not denying that happened. The point I am making is that POPES did not order these things to be done, CATHOLIC MONARCHS did, and Popes often opposed their actions.
 
How can anyone not love the Jewish People…you should define Jewish People; it’s as difficult as defining Christian and is highly politicized. I agree that Anti Zionism is likely a new guise of antisemitism. Besides, in our calling by Christ Jesus, we are advised and conditioned to love all people, sincere Jewish and Gentile Christians without bias, just as Jesus did.

I personally wonder if so much talk about Chosen People is not maudlin and inviting of antisemitism in much the same way it invites rhetoric against the Church.

Romans 2:28-29 as you must know
If anti-zionism is a new form of antisemitism, then how do you explain these ultraOrthodox Jews who are very anti-zionist?

jewsagainstzionism.com
 
The Bible is clear as to who rejected Jesus Christ and who was responsible for His death.

Whether or not you choose to accept what the Bible says is fact is not my concern.
The New Testament is clear.
 
God hates divorce.

Since everyone knows or is familiar with the culture of divorce, (we don’t have that, praise God) maybe we are asserting that God easily breaks his covenants to His people.

Would you like the idea when God tell us the new chosen people, “Let’s end this bond, for you are unfaithful to me, I’m moving on, I found someone else?”

If God is like that, easily ending commitments and promises, what is the assurance we have as Christians with regards to our own salvation? Nothing. He can effortlessly disregard what Jesus did on the Cross.

Look at the prophet Hosea, he personifies the character of a patient, unwavering God. He remained faithful to a prostitute wife (his bride). Hosea’s life experience is a symbolic representation of God and the unfaithful Israel.

The bottom line is, God is a faithful God period. He remains True to His words towards the Jews for the sake of the Patriarchs.
 
The Bible is clear as to who rejected Jesus Christ and who was responsible for His death.

Whether or not you choose to accept what the Bible says is fact is not my concern.
The New Testament is clear.
Would you agree that we should also condemned the Italians today for the barbarism of their soldiers during the crucifixion? Why blaim the the Jews only? And please recall, that through OUR sins He was condemned and crucified.
 
If anti-zionism is a new form of antisemitism, then how do you explain these ultraOrthodox Jews who are very anti-zionist?

jewsagainstzionism.com
I explain it as follows: one of them is the true enemy, one not. The label attached to either side is relative and not fixed.

Matthew 10:34-36

Jesus: A Cause of Division

“Do not think that I have come to bring peace upon the earth. I have come to bring not peace but the sword. For I have come to set a man 'against his father, a daughter against her mother and a daughter in law against her mother in law; and one’s enemies will be those of his household.”

As for the household:

Matthew 12:25 "But he knew what they were thinking and said to them, ‘Every kingdom divided against itself will be laid waste, and no town or house divided against itself will stand.’ "
 
God hates divorce.

Since everyone knows or is familiar with the culture of divorce, (we don’t have that, praise God) maybe we are asserting that God easily breaks his covenants to His people.

Would you like the idea when God tell us the new chosen people, “Let’s end this bond, for you are unfaithful to me, I’m moving on, I found someone else?”

If God is like that, easily ending commitments and promises, what is the assurance we have as Christians with regards to our own salvation? Nothing. He can effortlessly disregard what Jesus did on the Cross.

Look at the prophet Hosea, he personifies the character of a patient, unwavering God. He remained faithful to a prostitute wife (his bride). Hosea’s life experience is a symbolic representation of God and the unfaithful Israel.

The bottom line is, God is a faithful God period. He remains True to His words towards the Jews for the sake of the Patriarchs.
I find it amazing and deplorable that people can overlook the theme that runs throughout both the Old and New Testaments. God’s Covenants are conditional.

Jeremiah 31:31-37, among MANY other passages in the entire Bible, says that if the Jewish people ever fail to keep God’s Covenant, He will cut them off from being a people before Him, forever.

Here is just one small part: “If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me forever”. (Jeremiah 31:36)

Look…as a Jewish Christian, I recognize that the modern Catholic Church is desperate to distance herself from the “replacement theology” of the early Church Fathers and the New Testament so as not to be thought of as “antisemitic”, but we have to be honest.

Scriptural honesty must always come before political correctness. I’m telling you this as a JEWISH Christian.

Do you honestly think ultraOrthodox Jews would ever change what is in their Talmud, simply to avoid offending Christians? If you think they would, think again. In fact one of the Cardinals at Vatican II said as much!
 
I am aware of the difference. Secret Jews whether they were false Catholics, or Catholics who wanted to maintain some of their Jewish traditions, does not give the church the right to torture people. Did it give the Catholic King of Spain the right to expel all Jews from Spain on the 9th of Av, in about 1490? Where was the Catholic church when Catholic temporal rulers were making these type of decisions?
Jews were expelled for purely political reasons. They were allies with the Muslims. They were friends of the enemy. Of course the King of Spain had the right, he was the King! He had the right to protect his Kingdom.

The Inquisition was started by the Catholic laity who were jealous of Catholics with Jewish blood. Most of these conversos families had converted 200 years earlier before the the expulsion. Many Catholics with Jewish ancestry had come to hold very important positions, successful in business, etc. Not even Bishops with Jewish blood were safe from accusations of heresy. The Catholic Laity held riots demanding the government investigate heresies. Many great Catholics were of Jewish Ancestry such as St. Teresa of Avila and St. John of the Cross.

The Spanish government caved in to the people’s demands in order to maintain order. They asked the Catholic Church in Spain for assistance in the matter. The infamous Torquemada was in charge.

Torquemada was cruel but most of all he was a coward. He himself was a descendant of Jews and was probably very scared someone would accuse him of heresy as they were accusing other Catholic clergy. The Catholic laity rioted more complaining they were not being tough enough.

It was the Vatican who put the limits and demanded no blood be shed, etc. The Vatican had no authority to stop the heresy law.

I am not indifferent to the situation for many of my ancestors were conversos and my family still has some Jewish customs and in fact unlike most Jews in the US I actually have a real Jewish surname.😃 It is also very possible that some of my ancestors were the jerks demanding the inquisition.

The real disturbing thing about the inquisition is that Catholics betrayed God as well as their fellow Catholics. The Vatican simply tried to keep the situation under control.
 
Hail Linus, I have noticed a very curious but sad phenomenon not only in this thread, but elsewhere, whereever Christians of all denominations assemble.

They all seem desperately eager to “prove” they love Jews, even to the point of denying the very words of Scripture. What I find interesting is that its the Jewish Christians, like you and me and others, who try to tell them to wake up!
 
If anti-zionism is a new form of antisemitism, then how do you explain these ultraOrthodox Jews who are very anti-zionist?

jewsagainstzionism.com
As an American I will defend Israel to the end. However, you are absolutely correct. One of my favorite movies is called “The Chosen” and it touches on this very subject. The Hasidim in this movie were very upset about the Zionist movement. An Orthodox Jew once told me that the Orthodox felt the creation of the State of Israel was an insult to God because Jews were supposed to wait for God to restore Israel.
 
Hail Linus, I have noticed a very curious but sad phenomenon not only in this thread, but elsewhere, whereever Christians of all denominations assemble.

They all seem desperately eager to “prove” they love Jews, even to the point of denying the very words of Scripture. What I find interesting is that its the Jewish Christians, like you and me and others, who try to tell them to wake up!
I agree with you. What we are saying is nothing compared to the books of the Prophets. The language of those books is so strong I am surprised they are not called anti-Semitic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top