This is a good reason why they shouldn’t be. A powerful politician using public information to possibly incite violence against his political opponents should give everyone pause. It sure would if Trump did it.Political donor lists are public.
Conservatives probably didn’t realize that powerful politicians would use the information to possibly incite violence against them. Live and learn. It is Texas, so they’re probably armed, which should even the odds a little.Were conservatives unaware that political donations are public records or something?
Are conservatives just so used to their own side committing political violence at this point that they assume everyone else does too?Conservatives probably didn’t realize that powerful politicians would use the information to possibly incite violence against them.
It’s totally okay as long as you’re comfortable being known for eliminationist sentiments.An important word is missing: illegal. If caravans of people are coming to cross the border illegally then by definition they are invaders. A synonym for invader is intruder. Is that okay to say?
so are property records which can be used to find where someone lives. It does not make it right to tweet it out to the world. It is a scumbag thing to find that information then tweet it out for all to see because you disagree with that person for some reason. the sole purpose of doing so is to get others to harass these people.Political donor lists are public.
There seems to be a bit of irony here. Castro believes Trump is encouraging violence, so he doxxes Trumps donors which does encourage violence.Can someone explain the issue here? Were conservatives unaware that political donations are public records or something?
You OK with doxxing?
When it’s done by liberals, sure! Only when Trump supporters and conservatives then is it bad.Information about political donors isn’t doxxing, it’s public by law.
so you support it?Information about political donors isn’t doxxing, it’s public by law.
Some avoid using the word; it can be seen as dehumanizing.An important word is missing: illegal.
I understand “doxxing” to be the release of private personally identifying information that was not otherwise public.You OK with doxxing?
It’s fine for anyone to publish information about political donations.When it’s done by liberals, sure! Only when Trump supporters and conservatives then is it bad.
I support total transparency when it comes to political donations.so you support it?
This is an example of how frighteningly normalised domestic terrorism has become. Jovially forseeing armed killings as normal defense. It’s staggering.Felicia1:![]()
Conservatives probably didn’t realize that powerful politicians would use the information to possibly incite violence against them. Live and learn. It is Texas, so they’re probably armed, which should even the odds a little.Were conservatives unaware that political donations are public records or something?
You didn’t answer the other question…what do you think Castro’s motive was?Horton:![]()
It’s fine for anyone to publish information about political donations.When it’s done by liberals, sure! Only when Trump supporters and conservatives then is it bad.
I support total transparency when it comes to political donations.so you support it?
So if its already public, what do you suppose Castro’s motive is by tweeting it?Guess we need another civics lesson on what are “public records”.
Here you go, the Federal Election Commission database.
Browse Individual contributions | FEC