Justified by Faith Alone cf. James 2:24

  • Thread starter Thread starter AugustTherese
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok then. If I’m understanding you correctly, if the man in my hypothetical is one of the elect it doesn’t matter how he lives? Because no amount of sin can separate him from God? Or loose his place in heaven? Not even adultery/fornication or whatever you might call this man’s sin?
As it comes to that man’s salvation, it has nothing to do with how he lives. His salvation lies in Christ’s righteous alone. But how one lives as Christians has a direct impact on God’s Kingdom, so in that regard it matters greatly. And when we face Him, we will give an account for our actions (good and bad).
What about nothing unholy being able to enter into the Presence of God? Does this man merely by virtue of his death become holy?
Most confuse holiness with spiritual cleanliness. But that is not what holy means. Holy mean to be set-apart for God Kingdom. One becomes holy not at death, but at spiritual life.
So then the list of sins in Galatians 5:19-21 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 that clearly states one “shall not obtain the kingdom of God” only apply to the non-elect? Or doesn’t it really matter…cause the non-elect aren’t going to heaven anyway? I’m confused.
This is an very narrow hypothetical situation presented. If the assumption is he is one of God’s elect, answer your question with this question: If God has predestined this man to be in His Kingdom(Rom 8:29, Eph 1:4,5) what can anyone do, including this man, to overcome God’s power and thwart His plan? I’m not asking a rhetorical question. Please answer it directly and you will get your answer to your question.
 
If he perseveres in the life he was saved into. If not, then he believed in vain, and did not have love from above. We should know our present state, but we do not know our future state. Though we should have a living hope and faith that we might make it to the finish in his good grace.
So you do not believe God elects anyone? That its up to us to fulfill God’s plan for our lives even though the scripture I have presented tells us otherwise?

rcwitness;14739613 said:
And if we know that he hears us in whatever we ask, we know that we have obtained the requests made of him.*If any one sees his brother committing what is not a mortal sin, he will ask, and God will give him life for those whose sin is not mortal. There is sin which is mortal; I do not say that one is to pray for that.*All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal.[/INDENT]

What translation are you using? I have never seen “a sin which is not unto death” translated as “mortal sin”. Not even in the NAB translation. But we know that this passage refers to physical death, not spiritual death. Cross with Acts 5:1–10 and 1 Corinthians 11:30.
Doing “a good deed” does not mean we don’t need to repent from sins committed. This caricature does not represent Catholic belief.
You totally miss the point in what I wrote. God is NOT moving us in and out of salvation. You have it or you don’t. Scripture is clear on that fact.
There are Scripture passages that you are neglecting.

Romans 11
Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you too will be cut off.
I have not neglected these passages at all. James248 presented Romans 11 and Hebrews 10 and I have answered using scripture. Please see those previous posts.
 
St John Chrysostom disagrees with you. He attests to these scripture verses having much to do about salvation.

Perhaps you’ve never read his Homily 11, covering 1 Corinthians 4:3-5.

More on this 4th century Doctor of the Church here.

Note: His Homily 11 was of course part of the Liturgy of the Word, which proceeds the Liturgy of the Eucharist …at Mass.
That is peculiar as my wife’s New America Bible’s title for this section is “The Role of God’s Minister”. If you want to convince me of anything, you should limit your responses to the Bible or maybe even the Apostolic fathers writings. Beyond that, there is too many differing opinions between the subsequent church fathers.
 

As it comes to that man’s salvation, it has nothing to do with how he lives. His salvation lies in Christ’s righteous alone. But how one lives as Christians has a direct impact on God’s Kingdom, so in that regard it matters greatly. And when we face Him, we will give an account for our actions (good and bad).

Seems to me “it has noting to do with how he lives” has turned what God Himself said was a narrow path into a very wide path. It reminds me of the warning in 2 Timothy 4:3.

Most confuse holiness with spiritual cleanliness. But that is not what holy means. Holy mean to be set-apart for God Kingdom. One becomes holy not at death, but at spiritual life.

So then your contention is that an “elect” is holy not matter how he lives? So then we can ignore 2 Peter 2:20-21 "For if flying from the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, being again entangled in them, they are overcome: their latter state is become unto them worse than the former. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of justice, than after they have known it, to turn back from that holy commandment which was delivered to them."

This is an very narrow hypothetical situation presented. If the assumption is he is one of God’s elect, answer your question with this question: If God has predestined this man to be in His Kingdom(Rom 8:29, Eph 1:4,5) what can anyone do, including this man, to overcome God’s power and thwart His plan? I’m not asking a rhetorical question. Please answer it directly and you will get your answer to your question.
You ask, what can anyone do, including this man, to overcome God’s power and thwart His plan? See 2 Peter 2 above and Hebrews 10:26-28 and then Galatians 5 and 1 Corinthians 6 for the list of sins that keep us from obtaining the kingdom of God. God’s will is that all be saved…but it is our choice to remain in the state of grace and not get “entangled in them” after being “saved”. I know a lovely man. He grew up in the Nazarene church, spent 22 years on the mission field. Lovely man. But he fell into sin, left his wife, kids and missions and is now living with his girlfriend. Please pray for him. BTW…this man claims the Nazarene church teaches you can loose your salvation…has that changed?
 
…If you want to convince me of anything, you should limit your responses to the Bible or maybe even the Apostolic fathers writings. Beyond that, there is too many differing opinions between the subsequent church fathers./QUOTE]

I am so sorry, but I cannot resist: too many differing opinions? Like the 10’s of thousands of “denominations” in Protestantism? This is exactly why I am Catholic. Authority. I find it odd that Protestants believe in the authority of the CC to determine the books of the Bible, yet reject that same authority for interpretation…even in light of the 10’s of thousands of splintered “denominations” caused by interpreting it themselves.
 
That is peculiar as my wife’s New America Bible’s title for this section is “The Role of God’s Minister”.
It is a passage about the Role of God’s minister but it’s speaking at the same time about how we are judged… we judge ourselves or does God judge us? We are capable of deception. We may be in a state of unrepentant mortal sin. And this sin leads to eternal death, not life (1 Jn 5:16-17).

Saint Thomas Aquinas commenting on the same passage.
  1. – Secondly, he shows that he does not even presume to judge himself, saying: I do not even judge myself. But this seems to conflict with a later statement: “If we judged ourselves truly, we should no be judged” (1 Cor 11:31). Therefore, everyone should judge himself. However, it should be noted that everyone should judge himself with the judgment of self-examination, about which the Apostle speak here, according to the spirit of Ps 77 (v. 6): “I meditate and search my spirit,” as well as with the judgment of condemnation and reproach in the face of obvious evils: “I will reprove my ways in his sight” (Jb 13:15). But with the judgment of absolution a person should not presume to judge himself innocent: “Though I am innocent, my own mouth would condemn me; though I am blameless, he would prove me perverse” (Jb 9:20). He assigns the reason for this when he says: I am not aware of anything against myself, i.e., I am not aware of any mortal sin: “My heart does not reproach me for any of my days” (Jb 27:6); but I am not thereby acquitted, i.e., that does not suffice for pronouncing myself just, because certains sins can be hiding in me, which I do not know: “Who can discern his sins?” (Ps 19:12); “I am blameless; I regard not myself” (Jb 9:21).
  2. – Thirdly, he concludes to the one to whom this judgment should be reserved, saying: It is the Lord who judges me, i.e., it is God’s exclusive province to judge whether I am a faithful minister or not, because this pertains to the heart’s intention, which God alone can weigh: “The Lord weighs the spirit” (Pr 16:2); “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately corrupt; who can understand it? I the Lord search the mind and try the heart” (Jer 17:9).
  3. – The when he says, Judge not before, he concludes the prohibition against rash judgment. In regard to this he does three things: first, he forbids them to anticipate God’s judgment, saying: Therefore, in keeping with my example, who neither judge myself nor care about being judged by others, but reserve my judgment to God, do not pronounce judgment before the time, because “every matter has its time” (Ec 8:6), before the Lord comes to judge: “The Lord enters into judgment with the elders and princes of his people” (Is 3:14). Hence the Lord Himself said: “Judge not” (Matt 7:1). However, this must be understood of hidden things, because God has commissioned men to judge manifest things: “Hear then and judge what is just” (Dt 1:16).
If you want to convince me of anything, you should limit your responses to the Bible or maybe even the Apostolic fathers writings.
Similarly DrBlank, I reject your interpretation of this scripture passage. Please be consistent and hold yourself to the same criteria and standard above, and cite an apostolic father who agrees with you.
Beyond that, there is too many differing opinions between the subsequent church fathers.
What’s interesting too Dr. Blank is applying your criteria to the canon of scripture itself. You won’t find the list of what books should be in the bible in scripture. The apostolic fathers disagreed on the NT canon, and it wasn’t until after them, including after St. Chrysostom’s writing that the canon itself was affirmed.

Somehow you tacitly profess that Catholic Bishops were infallible on the Canon, but didn’t know how to interpret it, no less when they used the bible at Church where they all presided over Mass, believing that the bread and wine actually became the Body and Blood of Christ (just like Christ explicitly says in John 6).
 
So you do not believe God elects anyone? That its up to us to fulfill God’s plan for our lives even though the scripture I have presented tells us otherwise?
Yes, I believe He elects us. I just don’t believe His election means we don’t have a free will. I don’t think you are wrong about many things! You have good knowledge of Scripture, and you may rely on Him more than myself, for all I know.

What I am suggesting, is that the “elect” are such, because they have been chosen and cooperated with God, unto the end.

I don’t believe God allows the elect to die in their Mortal sins. He gives them the opportunity to repent, like David and Peter. Yet some, who believed and are sanctified, do not repent, and may be cut off from the Salvation offered to them.

But this shouldn’t be a point of division for us. We should accept what the Church determines, or simply acknowledge that it is our personal opinion and not think we “know”. Right?
What translation are you using? I have never seen “a sin which is not unto death” translated as “mortal sin”. Not even in the NAB translation. But we know that this passage refers to physical death, not spiritual death. Cross with Acts 5:1–10 and 1 Corinthians 11:30.
I generally use RSV-CE… and ESV (from my non-Catholic years). But the term Mortal means “unto death”. So this shouldn’t be a source of contention either.
You totally miss the point in what I wrote. God is NOT moving us in and out of salvation. You have it or you don’t. Scripture is clear on that fact.
I agree, but also disagree. I agree, because God is in eternity. He knows our final state of justification. But I disagree, because we are in time, and we can receive His Spirit of Life, yet after trials and temptations, give up this Spirit for our own pleasures and weaknesses.
I have not neglected these passages at all. James248 presented Romans 11 and Hebrews 10 and I have answered using scripture. Please see those previous posts.
Ok, thank you. I don’t know if I can find them! It’s a large thread now! 😃

I hope you know that I’m not trying to tell you, you are wrong. I just think that you seem to be portraying some Catholic positions with an inaccurate interpretation. I think the whole “elect” issue has come up often, and it’s not so simple to understand. I believe we need to understand the “elect” as those who God knew would prevail in His grace. We should not think it means that the “elect” are able to sin without remorse and repentance.

So, I’m sure this passage has been addressed, but it’s the most appropriate for the discussion of “election”.

1 Peter 1
His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, that through these you may escape from the corruption that is in the world because of passion, and become partakers of the divine nature. For this very reason make every effort to supplement your faith with virtue, and virtue with knowledge, and knowledge with self-control, and self-control with steadfastness, and steadfastness with godliness, and godliness with brotherly affection, and brotherly affection with love. For if these things are yours and abound, they keep you from being ineffective or unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. For whoever lacks these things is blind and shortsighted and has forgotten that he was cleansed from his old sins. Therefore, brethren, be the more zealous to confirm your call and election, for if you do this you will never fall; so there will be richly provided for you an entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
If you look closely to passages like these, you see that their is a “condition” to our calling and election. What does it mean to “confirm your calling and election”? Peter explains earlier that we must “supliment our faith” with virtues that produce fruits of faith.

This is what I think we should acknowledge. That without a “living faith” that turns from sins, we fall away from Him and His salvation. I agree that we don’t need to earn our salvation, but that we get to participate in our salvation. We are given His Spirit to be led by. If we neglect His Spirit, we can be “cut off” from the Tree of Life". He alone will be the judge of this matter, when we meet Him after our death.
 

You ask, what can anyone do, including this man, to overcome God’s power and thwart His plan? See 2 Peter 2 above and Hebrews 10:26-28 and then Galatians 5 and 1 Corinthians 6 for the list of sins that keep us from obtaining the kingdom of God. God’s will is that all be saved…but it is our choice to remain in the state of grace and not get “entangled in them” after being “saved”. I know a lovely man. He grew up in the Nazarene church, spent 22 years on the mission field. Lovely man. But he fell into sin, left his wife, kids and missions and is now living with his girlfriend. Please pray for him. BTW…this man claims the Nazarene church teaches you can loose your salvation…has that changed?
**God bless Debbie Kono and every readers of the CAF.

GOD’S DESIRED WILL IS THAT ALL WILL BE SAVED**

For the fulfillment of God’s desired will God needs men’s cooperation.
Lack of men’s cooperation thwart the fulfillment of God’s desired will.

WITH AN ABSOLUTE DECREE GOD PREDESTINED HIS CHOSEN SONS AND DAUGHTERS/ELECT TO HEAVEN

For the fulfillment of God’s absolute decree God MAKES men to cooperate with His grace without violating their free will.

So, nothing thwarts the fulfillment of God’s absolute decree.

If that “lovely man” is among God’s chosen sons and daughters/elect he will end up in heaven with absolute certainty.

God bless Debbie and every readers of the CAF.

LatinRight
 
Yes, I believe He elects us. I just don’t believe His election means we don’t have a free will. I don’t think you are wrong about many things! You have good knowledge of Scripture, and you may rely on Him more than myself, for all I know.

What I am suggesting, is that the “elect” are such, because they have been chosen and cooperated with God, unto the end.

I don’t believe God allows the elect to die in their Mortal sins. He gives them the opportunity to repent, like David and Peter. Yet some, who believed and are sanctified, do not repent, and may be cut off from the Salvation offered to them.

But this shouldn’t be a point of division for us. We should accept what the Church determines, or simply acknowledge that it is our personal opinion and not think we “know”. Right?

I generally use RSV-CE… and ESV (from my non-Catholic years). But the term Mortal means “unto death”. So this shouldn’t be a source of contention either.

I agree, but also disagree. I agree, because God is in eternity. He knows our final state of justification. But I disagree, because we are in time, and we can receive His Spirit of Life, yet after trials and temptations, give up this Spirit for our own pleasures and weaknesses.

Ok, thank you. I don’t know if I can find them! It’s a large thread now! 😃

I hope you know that I’m not trying to tell you, you are wrong. I just think that you seem to be portraying some Catholic positions with an inaccurate interpretation. I think the whole “elect” issue has come up often, and it’s not so simple to understand. I believe we need to understand the “elect” as those who God knew would prevail in His grace. We should not think it means that the “elect” are able to sin without remorse and repentance.

So, I’m sure this passage has been addressed, but it’s the most appropriate for the discussion of “election”.

1 Peter 1
His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence, by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, that through these you may escape from the corruption that is in the world because of passion, and become partakers of the divine nature. For this very reason make every effort to supplement your faith with virtue, and virtue with knowledge, and knowledge with self-control, and self-control with steadfastness, and steadfastness with godliness, and godliness with brotherly affection, and brotherly affection with love. For if these things are yours and abound, they keep you from being ineffective or unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. For whoever lacks these things is blind and shortsighted and has forgotten that he was cleansed from his old sins. Therefore, brethren, be the more zealous to confirm your call and election, for if you do this you will never fall; so there will be richly provided for you an entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
If you look closely to passages like these, you see that their is a “condition” to our calling and election. What does it mean to “confirm your calling and election”? Peter explains earlier that we must “supliment our faith” with virtues that produce fruits of faith.

This is what I think we should acknowledge. That without a “living faith” that turns from sins, we fall away from Him and His salvation. I agree that we don’t need to earn our salvation, but that we get to participate in our salvation. We are given His Spirit to be led by. If we neglect His Spirit, we can be “cut off” from the Tree of Life". He alone will be the judge of this matter, when we meet Him after our death.
The question here I think should be answered is: Can a person lose his salvation?
 
The question here I think should be answered is: Can a person lose his salvation?
Then I say, yes.

The thing is, is that non-Catholic Christians (and Catholics) should define “salvation” in this context, when discussing this topic.
 

You ask, what can anyone do, including this man, to overcome God’s power and thwart His plan? See 2 Peter 2 above and Hebrews 10:26-28 and then Galatians 5 and 1 Corinthians 6 for the list of sins that keep us from obtaining the kingdom of God. God’s will is that all be saved…but it is our choice to remain in the state of grace and not get “entangled in them” after being “saved”. I know a lovely man. He grew up in the Nazarene church, spent 22 years on the mission field. Lovely man. But he fell into sin, left his wife, kids and missions and is now living with his girlfriend. Please pray for him. BTW…this man claims the Nazarene church teaches you can loose your salvation…has that changed?
So you believe that when God predestines this man to be a part of His Kingdom, He is not omniscient and did not realize this man would backslide so much that that this man would overcome God’s grace. God made a mistake?

The passage in Peter refers to how we, now as God’s new creation, would hate our lives even more if we entangled ourselves in sin. How our hate for sin makes us miserable in this life if we participate in continued sin. Has nothing to do with salvation, or the loss thereof.

The Nazarene Church does teach you can lose your salvation but only by renouncing Jesus (blaspheme of the Holy Spirit). It is a technical point of disagreement I have the with Church. The Church is correct that there is no salvation in this situation. But what authentic child of God would ever do this? Could you image any of the apostles rejecting Jesus? Any of the Christian who were fed to the lions by the Roman empire because they refused to renounce Jesus? It is the same with any TRUE child of God. Its a situation that would never occur.

Cathodic view for your friend:
Hebrews 10:26-28 tell us this man doesn’t need our prayers. He needs our pity. There is no more sacrifice for his sin. He is doomed.

The Protestant view:
This man is miserable. But the good news, is we know all of his sins were forgiven, not just his past sins. But all sins. We need to pray for him that the Holy Spirit will work in his life and restore his relationship with God.

I feel bad for your friend. I will pray for him.
 
Just to bring this discussion on salvation to a close, when is a Catholic saved?

Salvation is defined as saved from hell; Heaven-bound.

The Bible tells me it was at my conversion.

For a Catholic, it is when…
 
If that man was selected/elected as defined in Romans 8:30, an authentic, born-again, regenerated-by-God Christian, then yes. He will go to Heaven.

The difficulty for Catholics in this hypothetical situation lie in the un-Biblical view of venial and mortal sin (all sin in mortal - James 2:10) and the possibility of losing one’s election/salvation. When we are saved, we are saved!

God is not in Heaven with his ledger saying, “Oh look, John Doe sinned to much today. I’m passing him back to the death column and blotting out his name in the Book of Life.” And the next day, “Oh John did a good deed today. His ledger in the positive again so I’m passing him back to life and rewriting his name back in the Book of Life”. God says He will NOT blot our name out of the Book of Life. It is a promise, not a warning.

Consider this scripture: “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since we have now been justified by His blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through Him! For if, while we were God’s enemies, we were reconciled to Him through the death of His Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through His life!” (Romans 5:8–10).
Hi drblank1 I disagree with your premise, while God desires all men to be saved not all will be saved. Why? because because of choice that is we choose whether or not to do God’s will and how God wants us to live. If a person dies in a state of sin and has not asked for forgiveness God may decide that the person rejects him and His mercy and may end up in hell. If at the point of death the person asks for forgiveness well then in God mercy he surely will not go to hell. But in the end it is up to God to decide whether or not a person goes to hell or to heaven and while we can say this or that about whether or not a person due to his actions will go either to heaven or hell still its not up to us to decide other than to say maybe its something we should not do that is commit that sin. Yes, Christ died for us that we might have life eternal with God but we can lose salvation by the sines we commit, if we are not forgiven those sins we committed. God knows the hearts of men and knows if one asks for forgiveness if it is sincere or not. To be reconciled means to be living in a way that God desires of us, therefore, one must accordingly live as Christ taught. In the hypothetical statement, the man was living a lie in that as Christ said one can’t serve both God and mammon. Which it appears the man was doing.
 
Cathodic view for your friend:
Hebrews 10:26-28 tell us this man doesn’t need our prayers. He needs our pity. There is no more sacrifice for his sin. He is doomed.
Not true. Prayers for all men are good and profitable. Yet, forgiveness of mortal sin, after Baptism, is only through repentance/confession.
The Protestant view:
This man is miserable. But the good news, is we know all of his sins were forgiven, not just his past sins. But all sins. We need to pray for him that the Holy Spirit will work in his life and restore his relationship with God.
I didn’t know there is one Protestant position on this… :rolleyes:
 
Just to bring this discussion on salvation to a close, when is a Catholic saved?

Salvation is defined as saved from hell; Heaven-bound.

The Bible tells me it was at my conversion.

For a Catholic, it is when…
The Catholic is saved or damned at the time of his death and judgement.

Salvation is not a one time event…it is a process that we work out with fear and trembling as St. Paul says.

The only One who knows our final destination is God…this false doctrine of assurance can easily lead to presumption, as the case with my friend. He firmly believes God wants him to be happy in this life and therefore chases things of the world. I can assure you though, he believes.
 
Apparently drblank forgot this. 🤷
No I haven’t, just trying to prove that the scripture in Hebrews could not possible mean what Catholic interpretation is.

I continue to ask for definitive answers to my question and they continued to be ignored. Why? Because the Catholic view does not give one a sense of peace with God. Joy is unattainable because the Catholic is taught that Jesus’ sacrifice was not complete and if you sin too much, you will lose your salvation. This is not a Biblical view. So, I will ask one more time.

I was saved at my conversion.

At what point is a Catholic saved/heaven-bound/have eternal life?

Besides coming to faith, what are the definitive works one must complete to gain eternal life?

Even under the Law (OT), God was always crystal clear on His plan for redemption. And He is just as clear in the NT.
 
The Catholic is saved or damned at the time of his death and judgement.

Salvation is not a one time event…it is a process that we work out with fear and trembling as St. Paul says.

The only One who knows our final destination is God…this false doctrine of assurance can easily lead to presumption, as the case with my friend. He firmly believes God wants him to be happy in this life and therefore chases things of the world. I can assure you though, he believes.
You answered my question while I was responding. Thanks for that. So there is no clear way for a Catholic to know if one will be in Heaven at death? You have to work hard and hope for the best?

And further, since you assert that assurance of salvation is a “false doctrine”, John assures his audience in his first letter they have eternal life. You would disagree with him?
 
Just to bring this discussion on salvation to a close,
😃 I wish!
when is a Catholic saved?
Baptism and belief.
Salvation is defined as saved from hell; Heaven-bound.
We believe there is an initiation into salvation, and a final judgment from Jesus, whether a person continued in salvation. See Matthew 25
The Bible tells me it was at my conversion.
For a Catholic, it is when…
Baptism, belief, obeying Christ’s commands in love.
 
You answered my question while I was responding. Thanks for that. So there is no clear way for a Catholic to know if one will be in Heaven at death? You have to work hard and hope for the best?

And further, since you assert that assurance of salvation is a “false doctrine”, John assures his audience in his first letter they have eternal life. You would disagree with him?
We can only be assured of our present state. Simple.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top