Kamala Harris On Immigration: Sessions Wants To Roll Back The Clock, "California

  • Thread starter Thread starter MonteRCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Point taken, I’m talking about stuff outside the specific scope of this topic. I apologize for the confusion.
 
40.png
ProdglArchitect:
It doesn’t matter what the letter of the law says if they will not be enforced.
Specifically, what letter of what law is not being enforced?
Immigration laws in general are not being enforced in those cities. Hence, no letter of the law is being enforced at all. That said, I acknowledge that I’m no longer talking about the topic at hand, and will drop the discussion.
 
Last edited:
What happened to the Republican Rebel Yell of:
States Rights, States Rights, States Rights

At least that was the war chant when it comes to other issues…
Yep. Kamala Harris who’s background is as a prosecutor and state AG before becoming a US senator put it this way:

“You can look at this attorney general who has said that imposing the terms of the Voting Rights Act on the states creates an undo burden and is meddling with the affairs of each state. So it’s hypocrisy at it’s height,” Harris said.
 
What happened to the Republican Rebel Yell of:
States Rights, States Rights, States Rights

At least that was the war chant when it comes to other issues…
Historically, it was Democrats who abused the 10th amendment in order to maintain segregation, but that said, no state official is required to enforce federal laws, under posse comitatus laws, as I recall.
That’s is not what the Oakland mayor did, however. She aided and abetted criminals in avoiding law enforcement.
And if California allows foreign nationals to vote in federal elections, that is a serious violation of federal law.
 
Immigration laws in general are not being enforced in those cities
I suspect that federal authorities in these cities are enforcing pertinent federal laws. And that state and local authorizes are enforcing state and local laws. What evidence can you produce to the contrary?
 
40.png
ProdglArchitect:
Immigration laws in general are not being enforced in those cities
I suspect that federal authorities in these cities are enforcing pertinent federal laws. And that state and local authorizes are enforcing state and local laws. What evidence can you produce to the contrary?
Or, in the case of Oakland, openly acting to aid and abet criminals evading the law.
 
That is a serious charge. Is that being made by any competent official?
The AG says it is being investigated, but she essentially admitted it. But this is easy:
After Schaaf learned that there would be an immigration raid in Northern California targeting about 1,000 illegal immigrants deemed “public safety threats” — most of them convicted felons or repeat immigration violators — she took to Twitter to warn everyone about it. As a result, federal officials say, they only managed to catch about 232 of their 1,000 or so targets.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/d...o-enforce-the-law-in-her-city/article/2651117
 
The AG says it is being investigated, but she essentially admitted it.
So this is your legal opinion, FWIW. The mayor consulted with counsel before tweeting, and the legal matter is not as black and white as you think. We’ll see how this “review” plays out.


BTW if ICE were actually focusing on “public safety threats” rather that administrative arrests, they likely would have all of the cooperation in the world.

 
Last edited:
So this is your legal opinion, FWIW. The mayor consulted with counsel before tweeting, and the legal matter is not as black and white as you think. We’ll see how this “review” plays out.
I didn’t say my was a legal opinion, just my opinion. I agree with Sessions, she intentionally put Americans at risk. She’s an absolute scoundrel.
BTW if ICE were actually focusing on “public safety threats” rather that administrative arrests, they likely would have all of the cooperation in the world.
No they wouldn’t, not from people who favor unfettered open borders like this mayor does.
She doesn’t have to cooperate. She just needs to not interfere. If one of these criminals commits another crime, she should be help accountable.
 
No they wouldn’t, not from people who favor unfettered open borders
I didn’t see that anything in her remarks about unfettered open borders, but a problem with ICE’s new focus on administrative arrests.
 
Last edited:
40.png
JonNC:
No they wouldn’t, not from people who favor unfettered open borders
I didn’t see that anything in her remarks about unfettered open borders, but a problem with ICE’s new focus on administrative arrests.
So, you’re okay with her intentionally undermining federal law? I see her as no different than George Wallace blocking the school door
 
Last edited:
In a statement released Tuesday, the agency’s San Francisco field office cited several offenders, including two Sureños gang members, one of whom was arrested in Sacramento.

ICE says that person has convictions for spousal abuse, felony possession of a firearm, threatening with intent to terrorize, and several others.

Also in Sacramento, a Guatemalan citizen with a conviction for false imprisonment was arrested.

ICE arrested one person in Bay Point who it says has been deported eight times.

Agents also arrested a Honduran citizen who has multiple arrests for cocaine trafficking and one arrest for sex with a minor.

The agency called out Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf’s for warning citizens of ICE operations last week. The agency’s Deputy Director, Thomas D. Homan, accused the mayor of putting officers in danger. In response, Schaaf defended her decision.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top