Kamala Harris promises more violence

[Adamek]

Harris promises more violent riors, even after the election. Good times ahead.

 

[umamibella]

This is a very misleading headline you have made . The interviewer asked about protests.

Kamala Harris responded that the protests would not stop, and should not stop.
Kamala Harris was not talking about rioting and violence.
How on earth did anyone get that out of this interview

There is a huge difference between protests and rioting. My understanding is that protests are legal and allowed in USA.

 

[Donkey]

…those two are trying to provoke.
Praying Americans don’t fall for their antics.

 

[Donkey]

Kamala Harris responded that the protests would not stop, and should not stop.
Kamala Harris was not talking about rioting and violence.

It is all the same in these Dem run cities. Americans know exactly what Harris means.

 

[Adamek]

These are the peaceful protests Kamala is referring to:

 

[umamibella]

…those two are trying to provoke.
Praying Americans don’t fall for their antics.

You could say that about any politician and interviewer,

 

[umamibella]

Protest does not mean setting things alight and she did not say that. Find a media report where she condones setting things alight.

 

[puer.dei]

How on earth did anyone get that out of this interview

It’s what they want to get out of the interview.

 

[Donkey]

You could say that about any politician and interviewer,

Not my Prolife politicians…

 

[umamibella]

Not my Prolife politicians…

I did not think there were any truly prolife politicians. Who are they? My definition of a prolife person is someone who does not condone abortion under any circumstances at all.
I know that with the major parties in Australia, there are no truly prolife politicians, they all place conditions on it.

 

[Nepperhan]

It is all the same in these Dem run cities. Americans know exactly what Harris means.

It is code speech?

 

[umamibella]

It is all the same in these Dem run cities. Americans know exactly what Harris means.

Or are some Americans hearing what they want to hear into it to promote their own agenda

 

[Donkey]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/vide...2746d8-e002-11e6-8902-610fe486791c_video.html

Harris doesn’t hide her darkness and evil intent to maintain her ‘right’ to kill voiceless babies.

Her agitation pairs with Biden’s bitterness.

 

[umamibella]

Can you point me to the mark in this youtube that states she condones violent rioting and burning and looting.

 

[Donkey]

You are being redirected...

Will Harris denounce DSA?

Doesn’t sound like it.

 

[Adamek]

Neither she nor anyone else from the democratic party ever spoke out against the rioting, looting, violence or killing. Not one of them. They simply pretended that these were peaceful protests.

The stupid ones went off script. The wildly popular mayor of NYC actully said in a public interview that these protest don’t have to be peaceful.

 

[TMC]

Neither she nor anyone else from the democratic party ever spoke out against the rioting, looting, violence or killing. Not one of them. They simply pretended that these were peaceful protests.

If you believe this, you are simply not paying attention. I saw Joe Biden on TV just today denouncing rioting, looting and violence. Maybe actually look to see what people are actually saying rather than echoing partisan talking points.

 

[StudentMI]

Neither she nor anyone else from the democratic party ever spoke out against the rioting, looting, violence or killing. Not one of them. They simply pretended that these were peaceful protests.

Joe Biden Condemns Riots: 'Setting Fires Is Not Protesting'

 

[7_Sorrows]

I hope she keeps gleefully supporting the BLM riots because that will ensure they lose.

I believe Americans know exactly what she means.

 

[7_Sorrows]

Yes, he did, but why did it take Joe so long. How long have the riots been going on and he just came out within the last month - the last 2 weeks to condemn them?