Kamala Harris promises more violence

Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw Joe Biden on TV just today denouncing rioting,
JUST TODAY. The democrats have finally realized that the country is turning against them. Their support for the riots is causing them to lose support among many Americans.
 
Yes, he did, but why did it take Joe so long. How long have the riots been going on and he just came out within the last month - the last 2 weeks to condemn them?
JUST TODAY. The democrats have finally realized that the country is turning against them. Their support for the riots is causing them to lose support among many Americans.
Please. Biden has been saying this all along. Biden also makes clear that he denounces violence on both sides. Meanwhile, Trump continues to justify violence by his supporters.
 
Prove it. Show some evidence when he specifically denounces the riots.
I have literally seen him do it. I am watching the morning news right now and they played a clip of it. If you are not seeing his speeches making these statements you must be actively avoiding them.
 
No, he hasn’t been saying this all along.
You can continue to ignore facts, but anyone can use Google. Meanwhile, Trump is refusing to condemn violence, and instead defends violence by his supporters. A pretty clear difference in position.
 
Yes. This morning. What about last week? Last month?
Yes. Google is your friend. Trump says his supporters are justified in committing acts of violence. Biden says violence is never justified.

Even if you believe Biden just now took a strong stance (which is untrue), how do you justify Trump’s position that violence by his supporters is OK?
 
This is about the democrats and Harris. And you are not showing any evidence to support your opinions. Why not? Because there is no evidence?
 
This is about the democrats and Harris. And you are not showing any evidence to support your opinions. Why not? Because there is no evidence?
So you admit that Biden denounces violence and Trump does not? OK, got it.

Edit - since your Google machine is apparently broken, here is Biden’s response to the Floyd protests back in May. The source is those lefties at Fox, so take that into account:
“Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response,” he said. “But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not.”
 
Last edited:
Classic example of millennial logic. LOL.
Not a millennial, but thanks. I edited my post to include a relevant article, since you seem to be struggling with finding things on the internet.
 
I little older, but not too far off.

Yes, I agree. To be fair, denouncing violence is not a particularly high bar. Unfortunately, the other candidate cannot seem to clear that bar.
 
This is about the democrats and Harris. And you are not showing any evidence to support your opinions. Why not? Because there is no evidence?
You have not offered up proof Harris is cheerleading for the rioting and burning and sacking of these places.

Whats your take on LA with the shooting ?
 
You have not offered up proof Harris is cheerleading for the rioting and burning and sacking of these places.

Whats your take on LA with the shooting ?

It is said the fund she supports have released persons with records of violence.
 
See the video again. Pay attention to the concluding remark. In referring to the riots she says: 'they’re not gonna let up, and we should not".
Dont you know the difference between the word ‘protest’ and the word ‘riot’?
It is said the fund she supports have released persons with records of violence.
It is said cannot be entered as proof in court.

She is not personally bailing out people.

My point is

Where is she actually saying, words from her own mouth, she supports the looting, burning, trashing, chaos that is rioting.

In the video offered by the op, both people are discussing protests.
 
Last edited:
There is a huge difference between protests and rioting.
No difference to the ones doing the protesting and rioting. Which ironically, you’ll find both groups at the same event.

He mentions the protesting going on in major cities across the US, with no reporting by the mainstream media. He’s giving a generalized statement to all the protesting taking place, not distinguishing between the rioting and the peaceful protesting. Her comments are in direct response to what he just said.

It was only later that she attempted to “clarify” her remarks. Typical “CYA” political rhetoric. You can clearly see what she’s referring to, but her comments allow her the ability to make a distinction, at a later time, as to what she really meant. :roll_eyes: :poop:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top