R
Ridgerunner
Guest
Why is it important that I, or anyone else, pay any attention to Whelan, particularly if he has withdrawn whatever it was he said?
Sounds like a waste of time to me.
Sounds like a waste of time to me.
THIS!!!I’m not Repub, but anyone so bothered about this that they would leave a party should be more concerned that somebody from their high school or their husband’s high school will pop up after 35 years and accuse them or their husband of committing a sex crime at some party way back when, with zero reliable evidence.
If I could give this post three likes, I would.Wrong.The Dems own the blame entirely with their dirty politics.Kavenaugh is the real victim here.His character has been maligned on mere alleged events of over thirty plus years ago. Well actually the Republicans, if they don’t insist on this woman testifying by Monday ,they need to move forward and vote Kavenaugh in.A man with a spotless record for his adult life is thrown under the bus all becUse the Dems cannot fathom another conservative appointee by Trump.I am just sickened and livid about this
It is only important if you wish that you response to a comment is properly informed by the content of that comment.Why is it important that I …
A real investigation is the last thing “the lady” wants. What she, and her handlers, want is to delay the vote on Kavanaugh until after the mid-terms so the Dems have the possibility of defeating a more conservative pick for the SCOTUS.Perhaps that is why the lady is asking for a real investigation.
I don’t disagree that Kavanaugh can be considered a victim here.Kavenaugh is the real victim here.His character has been maligned on mere alleged events of over thirty plus years ago
Too bad they didn’t call the bluff and move to an immediate and swift investigation.A real investigation is the last thing “the lady” wants
You may say this as often as you like, but that will never make it true. Or even plausible.And remember, the only reason they’re opposing Kavanaugh is his religion
I’m not seeing a desire to have an all out fight, at least not an inappropriate desire, given the silliness from the other side.Jeanne_S:![]()
I don’t disagree that Kavanaugh can be considered a victim here.Kavenaugh is the real victim here.His character has been maligned on mere alleged events of over thirty plus years ago
But if his hapless supporters had given a steady response to late breaking allegation, rather than dismal show they would have calmly navigated through turbulence, and Kavanuagh’s affirmation would be imminent.
Giving in to the desire to have an all out fight at every level, rather than just following a dispassionate process was blunder. Ataraxia … not.
With friends like those leading the Dem charge, who needs enemies?…anyone …should be more concerned that somebody from their high school or their husband’s high school will pop up after 35 years and accuse them or their husband of committing a sex crime at some party way back when, with zero reliable evidence.
You offered your opinion on blaming the victim without knowing what was talking about.Since I didn’t comment on the Whelan matter,
The comments and actions that noted in post #28 (and perahsp add the Tweets fom teh majority committee staffer) are not dispassionate.I am generally seeing a “following a dispassionate process,” along with an abiding sense that the charade will unravel on its own.
I don’t know that. Time will tell.I strongly suspect this entire affair will hurt the Dems far more than it will impact the GOP.
I further suspect that you also know that.
Just saying that doesn’t make you correct. It’s obvious what they’re doing, and everybody knows it. When even “pro-choice” people admit that the opposition to Kavanaugh is about abortion, you know it’s true. As I mentioned previously, NARAL is even advertising “I believe” buttons in support of Ms. Ford, essentially saying they believe her without any evidence. This is about abortion, and the providers and other supporters are out in force to sink Kavanaugh.You may say this as often as you like, but that will neveR make it true. Or even plausible.
The “bluff” wasn’t immediately obvious now, was it?Too bad they didn’t call the bluff and move to an immediate and swift investigation.
But you framed this as anti-Catholic bigotry, That frame is implausible given that Obama appointed a Catholic to the SCOTUS, with the support of Senate Democrats, the Democrats in Congress are more Catholic than the Republicans, and that so many Catholics register and vote ad Democrats. You may have an agenda to push, but that frame doesn’t wash.Just saying that doesn’t make you correct. It’s obvious what they’re doing, and everybody knows it. When even “pro-choice” people admit that the opposition to Kavanaugh is about abortion, you know it’s true
I am talking about Kavanuagh supporters and focused on the hapless ones - who tweeted their misogyny, their biases, and their fantastic theories of who the real attempted rapist was.You always feel the need to insert your personal opinions re Trump supporters
Reading of tweets, not minds.what do you call your statements?