Kavanaugh Drama Risks Driving Moderates, Women Away From GOP

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertmidwest
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet many have also held the capacity for violent action to be an essential part of masculinity.
 
starshiptrooper said:
The Republicans need to set an example here by putting Ford in jail,
Click to expand...
starshiptrooper said:
try individuals we have political disagreements with in the court of public opinion.
Click to expand...
Pot meet kettle.
starshiptrooper said:
…wish to commit genocide against white men
Click to expand...
This is simply ridiculous. It is too much like this type of paranoia:

" It means, in the final consequence, the absolute destruction of all economic, social, state, cultural, and civilizing advances made by western civilization "
 
Last edited:
The Church teaches we are not to judge the state of a man’s soul, which is a far cry from judging his actions.

But smooth talking seems to really impress D’s…
 
pnewton said:
Pot meet kettle.
Click to expand...
The difference is that I want her tried in an actual court first. If a rape accusation by a woman with no verifiable details or witnesses to support her is considered credible, it is certainly reasonable to believe that a woman with obvious political motives, financial incentives, wrongdoing of her own to conceal, and no evidence to support her claims is committing slander.

I hope Kavanaugh sues her for every penny that he can too.
This is simply ridiculous. It is too much like this type of paranoia:

" It means, in the final consequence, the absolute destruction of all economic, social, state, cultural, and civilizing advances made by western civilization "
Click to expand...
Quoting people’s words made in a public forum under their real names is not paranoia.
 
pnewton said:
This is simply ridiculous. It is too much like this type of paranoia:

" It means, in the final consequence, the absolute destruction of all economic, social, state, cultural, and civilizing advances made by western civilization "
Click to expand...
I have to admit, Newton, that is quite a leap, considering a GT assoc. prof called for laughter as they {elite men, as opposed to oppressed GT profs!} die then postmortem castration just this week.
 
Dr. Christine Ford’s voice was quivering and I can’t believe that an intelligent and well-educated world traveler, public speaker, can get behind a microphone and act like it’s like she was just the most frail and wilted flower in the world.

Those whose profession involve the voice know very well the various vocal techniques that professional vocalizers use, and she used to a great effect what is called uptalking or up-speaking, and that means to end every sentence on an up note.

It promotes the idea that you’re young and innocent and vulnerable, and it’s what people say was the little girl type voice.

But it’s a perfect illustration of how she speaks. Women don’t believe her.

Dr. Ford used self-hypnosis to convert herself to a helpless pre-teen.

The female prosecutor the Republicans hired, Rachel Mitchell, has put together a devastating forensic analysis of Dr. Ford’s testimony, and it is eight pages and devastating on the substance.

https://vimeo.com/292192821?ref=fb-share
 
Last edited:
Forgot to mention this earlier. When all else fails, prove Godwin correct, am I right?
 
Last edited:
Annie said:
40.png
pnewton:
This is simply ridiculous. It is too much like this type of paranoia:

" It means, in the final consequence, the absolute destruction of all economic, social, state, cultural, and civilizing advances made by western civilization "
Click to expand...
I have to admit, Newton, that is quite a leap, considering a GT assoc. prof called for laughter as they {elite men, as opposed to oppressed GT profs!} die then postmortem castration just this week.
Click to expand...
The claim of “white genocide” is being supported by one singular example?

And what happened to this thread?? “White genocide”? Dueling?
 
HarryStotle said:
He explicitly denied that it was his role.
Click to expand...
Are you serious?
John 5:
For just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, even so the Son gives life to whom he is pleased to give it. 22 Moreover, the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son, 23 that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father, who sent him.

24 “Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life. 25 Very truly I tell you, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear will live. 26 For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. 27 And he has given him authority to judge because he is the Son of Man.

28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29 and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned. 30 By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me.
Click to expand...
Matthew 25
When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on the throne of his glory. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, and he will put the sheep at his right hand and the goats at the left. Then the king will say to those at his right hand, ‘Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.’ … Then he will say to those at his left hand, ‘You that are accursed, depart from me into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not give me clothing, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.’ Then they also will answer, ‘Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not take care of you?’ Then he will answer them, ‘Truly I tell you, just as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.’ And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
Click to expand...
Now, apart from acknowledging Christ’s authority to judge, show me where this kind of authority is handed to off to laity.
 
dvdjs said:
40.png
HarryStotle:
That Google is unreliable?
Click to expand...
The conditional proposition: if 2+2=5, then I am the pope.
Click to expand...
See:
40.png
Kavanaugh Drama Risks Driving Moderates, Women Away From GOP World News
If 2+2=5, I am the pope. 2+2 has no chance of ever being 5, and you have, likewise, no chance of ever being pope. There is a chance, and from where I sit, a pretty good one, that her lawyers did commit fraud. So this supposed “argument” of yours, like Ford’s testimony, is not at all compelling.
Click to expand...
The point remains.

I have no idea what you are getting at.

Is it that there is no chance that Ford’s lawyers committed fraud?
 
I have a test to see if you are the Pope 😃
No need for Maths
What is your favourite soccer team, Holy Father?🧐
 
Last edited:
dvdjs said:
40.png
HarryStotle:
He explicitly denied that it was his role.
Click to expand...
Are you serious?
…
Now, apart from acknowledging Christ’s authority to judge, show me where this kind of authority is handed to off to laity.
Click to expand...
You are referring to the final judgement in these quotes, which is correct God alone will judge.

We were, however, previously speaking of temporal judgements on matters of good and evil. You are changing the terms here.

Go back to my previous post:
40.png
Kavanaugh Drama Risks Driving Moderates, Women Away From GOP World News
Christ spoke directly about his singular role in judging. Nothing about ours, IIRC. Not so… He explicitly denied that it was his role. I do not judge anyone who hears my words and does not keep them, for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world. (John 12:47) And just as explicitly put the onus on us to judge ”what is right." 54 He also said to the crowds, “When you see a cloud rising in the west, you immediately say, ‘It is going to rain’; and so it happens. 55 And when y…
Click to expand...
See also…
When any of you has a grievance against another, do you dare to take it to court before the unrighteous, instead of taking it before the saints? Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels—to say nothing of ordinary matters? If you have ordinary cases, then, do you appoint as judges those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to decide between one believer and another, but a believer goes to court against a believer—and before unbelievers at that? (1 Cor 6:1-6)
Click to expand...
Explicitly this kind of judgement is “handed off to the laity” – at least the sainted laity.
 
Last edited:
It is taking too long…🤨
That is suspicious…
What is your favourite infusion, ideal to share with friends,Holy Father? 🧐
 
Last edited:
Look,Harry: if we do not know the " basics" of Catholicism none of us can move forward… ☹️ .
Much less solve mysteries of complicated cases. No. No.
I do not know if 2+2 is 5 but he IS Not the Pope.☹️
 
Last edited:
graciew said:
Look,Harry: if we do not know the " basics" of Catholicism none of us can move forward… ☹️ .
Much less solve mysteries of complicated cases. No. No.
Click to expand...
Not understanding your point.

If “none of us” are wise enough to decide between one believer and another, then the Church is in real trouble.

Paul’s words were not qualified. If “any of you” have a grievance we are to take it before “the saints” by which he means the members of the Church, which is why he chastizes them with: " Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to decide between one believer and another…?

Are you claiming that by default, there is no one in the Church who knows the “basics” of Catholicism, and therefore none are able to “move forward?”

Are you putting yourself in the position of judging everyone in the Church as being incapable?

That would be quite lofty claim on your part, no?

Paul says we in the Church are tasked with “judging the world” and “judging angels,” and you, against Paul, are claiming there is no one currently in the Church who is competent to do so.

That is quite a judgement, is it not? Given you have just judged everyone in the Church.

You may want to rethink this.
 
Last edited:
It was joke…
But there are real answers to those questions without getting into Maths.
Just to take a breath of fresh air.That is all.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top