M
Marfran
Guest
Exactly.But humans do. That does not justify anything.
Exactly.But humans do. That does not justify anything.
This also doesn’t address the Catholic prohibition against causing unnecessary suffering to animals.True. Even if the killed animal is left on the forest floor, it is consumed by other critters.
As I have said, it is wrong to waste an animal. There are bad people in this world too, and some waste animals.Exactly.
Please show me some specific text, so I know what you are talking about.This also doesn’t address the Catholic prohibition against causing unnecessary suffering to animals.
From the Catholic CatechismPlease show me some specific text, so I know what you are talking about.![]()
This also doesn’t address the Catholic prohibition against causing unnecessary suffering to animals.
“Moral Theology” #406 Fr. Herbert Jones, OFM Cap, JCD, STL 8th Edition c 1961.“Clerics may carry arms only in necessity. Ordinary hunting is not prohibited, unless is it is of such a frequency that scandal ensues.”
It is not needlessly, we get food, enjoyment, population control etc. Same as with regular meat, an animal must die.From the Catholic Catechism
2418 It is contrary to human dignity to cause animals to suffer or die needlessly. It is likewise unworthy to spend money on them that should as a priority go to the relief of human misery. One can love animals; one should not direct to them the affection due only to persons.
I know a few priests that hunt quite often.So, at the very least, priests can hunt, as long as they don’t do it too often
.
I think it is the enjoyment and population control that people here are having a rough time with.It is not needlessly, we get food, enjoyment, population control etc. Same as with regular meat, an animal must die.
Same here, I’ve been out pheasant hunting with a priest. His dog was a great setter\flusher.I know a few priests that hunt quite often.
I find the “enjoyment” aspect thin, but I don’t disagree with the first one. Again, I think all Catholics need to keep this teaching in mind when hunting, if one chooses to hunt. One should temper one’s enthusiasm and adrenal and try to attempt clean kills.It is not needlessly, we get food, enjoyment, population control etc. Same as with regular meat, an animal must die.
Think of the enjoyment is an added benefit to getting meat. All good hunters try for the cleanest kill possible.I find the “enjoyment” aspect thin, but I don’t disagree with the first one. Again, I think all Catholics need to keep this teaching in mind when hunting, if one chooses to hunt. One should temper one’s enthusiasm and adrenal and try to attempt clean kills.
Just from what I have read here, it would seem a messy kill would lead to problems with the flavor from adreneline and various other chemicals an animal in distress will release into their blood.Think of the enjoyment is an added benefit to getting meat. All good hunters try for the cleanest kill possible.![]()
Yes, you are absolutely right:thumbsup:Just from what I have read here, it would seem a messy kill would lead to problems with the flavor from adreneline and various other chemicals an animal in distress will release into their blood.
Exactly, and anything other than a good, clean kill shot meansJust from what I have read here, it would seem a messy kill would lead to problems with the flavor from adreneline and various other chemicals an animal in distress will release into their blood.
I think you are in the wrong thread. The topic is hunting for “sport,” for the game of it. Enjoyment and thrill being the motivation, killing an animal for ego, not for food.It is not needlessly, we get food, enjoyment, population control etc. Same as with regular meat, an animal must die.
Perhaps it’s relative to the discussion?I think you are in the wrong thread. The topic is hunting for “sport,” for the game of it. Not for food.
Whatever your reasons are for hunting, you still have to use the meat.I think you are in the wrong thread. The topic is hunting for “sport,” for the game of it. Enjoyment and thrill being the motivation, killing an animal for ego, not for food.
This is why I have a hard time understanding hunters. The idea of a thrilling kill is foreign to me. I am often in a situation where I have to do something that may hurt someone. One could argue that there is nothing wrong with enjoying what I do. However, the day I enjoy hurting someone is the day I have to find a new job.I think you are in the wrong thread. The topic is hunting for “sport,” for the game of it. Enjoyment and thrill being the motivation, killing an animal for ego, not for food.