D
dolphinlove
Guest
Its crazy.The odd thing is that this particular site is by Moslems - they’re proud of it, and they’re against the apologists who seek to revise it!
Its crazy.The odd thing is that this particular site is by Moslems - they’re proud of it, and they’re against the apologists who seek to revise it!
And, apparently Moslems think dogs are dirty, too!Its crazy.
Oh i didnt know that, my friend who converted wont like that part!And, apparently Moslems think dogs are dirty, too!
I like dogs!
According to Islaamic Sharee’ah, it is not permitted to keep a dog except within narrowly-defined limits,Oh i didnt know that, my friend who converted wont like that part!
She LOVES dogs and wont be able to have one now…
I just read that and that rule is just rediculous!According to Islaamic Sharee’ah, it is not permitted to keep a dog except within narrowly-defined limits,
islamqa.com/index.php?ref=377&ln=eng
In the fridge?I just read that and that rule is just rediculous!
oooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhIn the fridge?
Ouch! Sorry, poor taste (ouch! - another pun)
Probably are grouping together to find some sort of comeback…The absence of our normal Muslim posters is interesting…
The Quran does many times say “a portion” of Jews, or “some” Jews, or “a section” of Jews. Why didn’t Muhammad say the same if indeed he meant some?If you know arabic language and specially the Quran . You would already know that when the Quran says the Jews he doesnt mean all Jews. Teh understanding of Muslims from this verse that Ezra has been so esteemed among some jews that some of them thought of him as the literal son of God. Btw, the Quran didnt refer to him as the messiah and there is no necessity fopr teh Messiah to be a son of God.
This is not an error of the Quran this is an error of how you understand teh Quran.
Without going into much details, The arabic language developed ‘‘ONLY’’ because of the Quran. The modern standard arabic that you are judging by is developed after the Quran has been revealed. There were no dots in the arabic language and there were no marks above or below the letters. A modern day arab wouldnt be able to read correctly ancient arabic if it woerent for the Quran. All was later developed for the sake of the Quran .** Is this not a ERROR in Grammar:**
20:63. The Qur’an :
According to Arabic grammar, these two must be in the accusative case after “Inna”, but they are stated in the nominative case which is completely wrong.Code:"These two are certainly magicians"—Inna Hazan Sahiran. The correct grammar must say, Inna Hazyn Sahiran.
(from answering Islam)
What you have quoted above shows exactly why muslims dont respond much to many of teh queations here . they ahve been simply answered befroe zillion times.Here is what the Koran says:
“O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of God aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) an apostle of God, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in God and His apostles. Say not “Trinity” : desist: it will be better for you: for God is one God: Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is God as a Disposer of affairs.” (Koran 4:171)
“They do blaspheme who say: God is one of three in a Trinity: for there is no god except One God. If they desist not from their word (of blasphemy), verily a grievous penalty will befall the blasphemers among them.” (Koran 5:73)
Its screwed up the oly Trinity by putting mary in there instead of Holy Spirit.
You got it right.Rrg…I hate to say it, but that’s not necessarily the nail in the coffin that you hoped.
All of the 6-day passages state ‘the heavens and the earth.’ However, the 2-day ones specify only the earth. Now, I don’t know the Qu’ran at all, but depending on context, that doesn’t contradict.
Sam, the Neon Orange Knight
What you have quoted above shows exactly why muslims dont respond much to many of teh queations here . they ahve been simply answered befroe zillion times.
Dear, The Quran wasnt refering to the trinity. Nor does the Quran define what is the trinity .
Actually, I do not see any clarification, perhaps you should go into more detail. Please.Without going into much details, The arabic language developed ‘‘ONLY’’ because of the Quran. The modern standard arabic that you are judging by is developed after the Quran has been revealed. There were no dots in the arabic language and there were no marks above or below the letters. A modern day arab wouldnt be able to read correctly ancient arabic if it woerent for the Quran. All was later developed for the sake of the Quran .
Hope i clarified,
Meedo
What exactly dont you understand? Its as simple as using old english instead of modern day english. Old english isnt wrong it is just old.Actually, I do not see any clarification, perhaps you should go into more detail. Please.
Here are some ERRORS to ponder and to clarify:
Earth created *first. (*Surah 2:29)
**Heavens **created *first. *(Surah 70:27-30)
All angels obey Allah. (Surah 16:49-50)
Not all angels obey Allah. (Surah 2:34)
Pharaoh drowned. (Surah 17:103, 28:40, 43:55)
Pharaoh did not drown. (Surah 10:92)
All of Noah’s sons were aboard the ark. (Surah 21:76-77)
Not all of Noah’s sons were aboard the ark. (Surah 11)
One angel spoke to Mary. (Surah 19:17-21)
Several angels spoke to Mary. (Surah 3:42-45)
Paradise has one garden. (Surah 39:73, 41:30, 57:21, 79:41)
Paradise has many gardens. (Surah 18:31, 22:23, 35:33, 78:32)
Allah can have a son. (Surah 39:4)
Allah can’t have a son. (Surah 6:101)
Face Mecca while praying. (Surah 2:115, 144)
Face Jerusalem while praying. (Surah 2:11
Why The** HUGE DIFFERENCES**, I mean they are** DIRECTLY OPPOSITE**?
Thank You.
Your counter is both old, and wrong!What exactly dont you understand? Its as simple as using old english instead of modern day english. Old english isnt wrong it is just old.
The absence of any *normal *Moslem poster is interestingThe absence of our normal Muslim posters is interesting…