O
OraLabora
Guest
“Young man”? Why thank you, at age 60, I take that as a compliment 
Do you have statistics?The Latin-loving Catholics are outbreeding other Catholics by about 2:1.
Only a matter of time…
Did you know?The idea that you can only have Mass in Latin, is something out of the Middle Ages.
www.prayinglatin.com
////The Latin language was consecrated at the Passion by its mystic inscription on the Cross
Because the Church held onto the power structure of separating the hierarchy, from the people. During St Teresa of Avila’s time in Spain, Scripture was only allowed to be translated into Classical Latin. This means, even St Teresa could not read Sacred Scripture, because she could not understand classical Latin, which was kept in the Priesthood. Keep in mind, it was Pope John XIII who called Vatican II and it’s from there that the Mass was brought back to the people.The Latin language…has been consecrated through constant use by the Apostolic see, the mother and teacher of all Churches Pope St John XXIII .”
Nonsense. The Early Church didn’t use Latin exclusively, but mostly the vernacular which was Aramaic and Greek. It wasn’t until the Church expanded West to places where Latin was the common language, that it’s use became more prominent. Latin is a language, period. There is nothing sacred about it as a language.The Latin language was sanctified by the usage of nearly 2000 years, and it was most closely interwoven with the primitive Roman Catholic liturgy
Which is of the Latin rite.It is the Roman Catholic Church. Not the Roman (Se habla Latin) Catholic Church.
“The Latin Church is simply that vast portion of the Catholic body which obeys the Latin patriarch, which submits to the pope, not only in papal, but also in patriarchal matters. It is thus distinguished from the Eastern Churches (whether Catholic or Schismatic), which represent the other four patriarchates(Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem), and any fractions broken away from them. The Latin patriarchate has always been considerably the largest.”
I have no issue with “sanctified” (whatever that means in this context). I do have a problem with the suggestion that Latin prayers are more powerful, or that God somehow prefers Latin over other languages. I think that kind of thinking strays far too close to magical thinking.I have no issue with the idea that Latin has been sanctified by the Church, but I’m sure it’s not true that all early liturgy was in Hebrew, Greek, or Latin… you’re forgetting Syriac / Aramaic.
I tend to think people who get really excited over Latin do so because it’s way to make it clear that they are Team Traditionalist. It’s a form of tribal signaling.I do have a problem with the suggestion that Latin prayers are more powerful, or that God somehow prefers Latin over other languages. I think that kind of thinking strays far too close to magical thinking.
- Prayer in Latin is a prayer in union with the rest of the Church in the same universal language she has prayed in since her inception.
- It is fitting that a universal (“catholic”) Church should pray in a universal language.
- The Latin language unifies all under one tongue thereby countering the havoc from the tower of Babel, and in a practical way it continues the gift of Pentecost by enabling people from all nations to understand and pray together in una voce (one voice) universally.
The Catholic Church is universal, not because the people are united in their use of the Latin language and Latin patrimony, but because we share one faith, in spite of differences in language, culture, theology and liturgy. Uniformity is not necessary for a universal Church as long as we have unity of faith. The saints throughout history have worshiped in Greek, Aramaic, Slavonic, Ge’ez, Armenian, Arabic, Syriac, Coptic and numerous other languages. Saint Cyril made the translation of the liturgical texts from Greek to Old Slavonic his life’s work. Saints have lived and died, never having heard a word of Latin uttered, let alone prayed in it. The liturgies of the East have never been prayed in Latin, except as a curiosity, perhaps.
- It unites all Catholics together with their spiritual patrimony, as they pray the same prayers in the same language as the Saints have from the catacombs and throughout history.
Interestingly, there is a lonng very long tradition dating back to the ancient Jews of praying in ancient Hebrew, which was a language used exclusively in Jewish temple worship. This was how Jesus prayed. The Catholic Church took up this same mantle with sacred Latin and continued praying in this language for well over 1000 years after the language dropped out of any normal linguistic talk. Far from a weakness, as these popes and Saints have explained, it is this language’s greatest strength. A sacred language enables the faithful to pray in a language they only use for holy things, rather than the language people use in ordinary chatter, gossip, and swearing. The precision and meaning of the language also remains in tact.Because Hebrew, Greek and Latin where the languages understood by the people in that area at that time. It doesn’t mean that the liturgy today should be exclusively in Latin,
The primary purpose of holy Mass stems from the virtue of religion to give to God something owed to him, something holy and pure. Mass itself is a sacrifice. This reality is unquestionably the purpose for holy Mass one when reads the teachings over the 2000 year tradition of the Church. People are not the purpose, the focus, but instead are able to participate–how?–by means of uniting their wills with what is taking place, which mystically is infinitely greater than anything else they can do on earth because of the power of this holy Sacrifice.Because the Church held onto the power structure of separating the hierarchy, from the people.
…the Mass was brought back to the people.
Indeed those teachings stem not from individual opinion but from solemn teachings of popes and the tradition of the Catholic Church. How then can we reconcile these realities with your keen observance? Latin is not absolutely necessary for salvation, but undeniably and especially for Latin Rite Catholics it has many great benefits to them. One does not have to believe in the Divine Mercy Chaplet in order to be saved, and one can even get to heaven without ever praying a Rosary, especially if he is from a rite that does not have the holy Rosary as part of its patrimony. Nevertheless, if one were to say that since in the eastern rites they do not have a Rosary that we do not need it in the west or that it is not important or even that it is not extremely powerful, then he would no doubt be missing out.Saints have lived and died, never having heard a word of Latin uttered, let alone prayed in it. The liturgies of the East have never been prayed in Latin, except as a curiosity, perhaps.
Yes, the patrimony of the Latin Church is important and the Latin language worthy of respect and retention, but these arguments do not ring true to one who has experience with the truly universal nature of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.