Y
yankeesouth
Guest
Well you did kind of suggest that for 1500 years the Catholic Church was basically discriminating.
Yes! Fr. Z’s contention that too many priests are being ordained with too little Latin carries with it the unexamined assumption that every one of those priests would have still been ordained had Fr. Z’s reading of the Latin requirements been in effect. I don’t think that is a very good assumption, at least not in the United States.The requirement of Latin almost prevented Saint John Vianney and Blessed Solanus Casey from receiving holy orders. We can debate that ad nauseam, or until the parousia, but life is too short.
Indeed, there’s nothing formally wrong with Latin, and the large patrimony of sacred music in Latin we’ve accumulated and it’s quite laudable to want to preserve that.Concern for Latin is so missing the point Jesus tried to make.
So why don’t we learn some Latin AND go to the Latin Mass at the same time?we have only a finite amount of time in our lives.
I’ve done the first one by going to an OF Mass that uses Latin (and singing in a schola), for the second one, are you paying for the gas?So why don’t we learn some Latin AND go to the Latin Mass at the same time?
The OF Latin Mass should be good enough to learn some Latin, I would think.I’ve done the first one by going to an OF Mass that uses Latin (and singing in a schola), for the second one, are you paying for the gas?![]()
Retirement budget. Twice a week to the abbey (160 km), 3x per month to choir rehearsals/liturgies, 600 km total, once every couple of weeks to Montreal, 200 km each time… not much room left to got to an EF MassHave you run out of gas already?
I feel like every personal request for money is preceded by like five requests for donations to other causes (a seminarian trying to pay off his bills, getting birettas for priests, cool Catholic stores, vestments for the TLM society in Madison, etc.).So does Catholic Answers. But neither he nor they demand it.
One of Waugh’s most persistent criticisms of the liturgical changes is that progressive, elitist-driven experimentation hurts ordinary people the most, undermining their confidence in important institutions. Vatican II represented, in Waugh’s mind, a rejection of the needs and opinions of local people. “A vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference,” he warned.
Nor were parish priests, the local leaders who best understand the common man, sufficiently consulted. Waugh wrote: “I know of none whose judgment I would prefer to that of the simplest parish priest. Sharp minds may explore the subtlest verbal problems, but in the long routine of the seminary and the life spent with the Offices of the Church the truth is most likely to emerge.”
Young man you go STRAIGHT to your room!!Perhaps we have outgrown being the “Latin” Church and it would be more accurate to say we are the Western Church? Or even the World Church?