LDS View of the Great Apostasy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fatboys
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And I can say the same for you. Don’t you find it odd that much of your doctrine can not be found with the pages of the Bible? I will pray for you
Fat,

You appear to have had a change of heart…
I am not sure why a LDS person would come here and inflame. I was actually looking for this reference to catholics allowed living polygamy because I remember reading about it from an article. I ran across this website and forum. The reason I was looking for this was because a relative of mine joined the catholic church and I asked why. They struggled with the Church living polygamy at one time. And so I search came here. Anyway as I read from the posts here I can tell that many here do not favor the LDS… And so if you have any questions about my faith, please ask. Love to answer. As well I will also ask questions of you. I have spent many years studying all religions as well as my own. Love to learn.
In another post you say that you are not trying to convince anyone to change their mind. I find that statement suspect. You believe that people lie and when you are directed to things that are not true you offer no support for what you believe and interpret that as an attack. It is difficult to be in your position because to admit that you have been lied to as all Mormons that leave the LDS finally do…it is like taking the rug out from under your feet. That cannot be pleasant.
That is okay. I was not trying to convince you to change your mind, but to understand why I believe it was restored. And if I only read what people who wrote about Joseph Smith that literally hated him, I would probably have the same opinion. But anti mormons have only one goal. That is to destroy the mormon church. I have caught them in lies and deceit.
No one wants to destroy the mormon church. It is doing that by professing things that are not true. Have you not read of all the untruths and lies that LDS has through the ages. I posted them before. Would you like to see them again?

You have attacked the Catholic beliefs, presented LDS beliefs, in my opinion justifying and not explaining them and you say you love to learn…it appears you love to teach and here feel sad for Catholics offfering prayer…when did you have a change of heart?

Sadness is a product of the human condition. Sadness is common among all. Sadness is shared when those that are sad cannot recognize their own condition of sadness and then offer no aid to resolution of sadness. I am sad. Sadness creates a catalyst for change. My prayer is that all that recognize their own sadness can look to see what it is that causes their sadness. It is sad that people that tell others that they are sad over their condition do not examine their own condition in the sadness of what it is they ask others to enjoy and that is truly sad. Their is no joy in untruth.
 
This is so funny. You are saying I am limiting God, but God could not create perfect beings who can choose good over evil. I am limiting God who had to have a backup plan for his creations. I am limiting God because God had to have a Savior to save us. I am limiting God who sends babies who are innocent and not capable of doing anything wrong into a place where they may or may not be saved.
I was responding to something another poster had said. But, yes, it seems from what you and other LDS posters have said, God is limited in his power. Gods creations are not “perfect” but he saw that his creations are good and he is pleased with what he has created. We are not perfect, and we have free will to choose good as well as the same free will to choose evil.

As far as I’m concerned, God is omnipotent and omniscient and can pretty much do what he pleases.
 
And I can say the same for you. Don’t you find it odd that much of your doctrine can not be found with the pages of the Bible? I will pray for you
Fat,

The LDS have the truth. Everyone else is wrong…history cannot be trusted…

Their was a great Apostasy…?
The Bible is corrupt…?
Joseph Smith is a Prophet…?
Mormons are correct…?
Mary was impregnated by God the father incarnate…?
Satan and Jesus are brothers…?
Salvation occured in the garden sweating of blood…?
We can become gods and have planets…?
You have to be Polygamous…you don’t have to be Polygamous…
Blacks are accursed and cannot be priests…Blacks are not accursed and can be priests…?
There is no archeological evidence of happenings in the book of Mormon…?
Jesus was born in Jerusalem…?
Scripture is Bible/King James/corrupt…Book of Mormon…Pearl of Great Price and Doctrines and Covenants…?

Book of Mormon is based on Plates no one saw…except some witnesses…and I have no clue what the truth about the witness is…but look here…this is not a Catholic website…

bible.ca/mor-witness-book.htm
Most of the witnesses are related by blood.
The three witnesses were all of questionable character
Joseph Smith said Dec 16, 1838, “Such characters as McLellin, John Witmer, David Witmer, Oliver Cowdry, and Martin Harris are too mean to mention; and we had liked to have forgotten them.” History of the Church, Vol 3, p232
Brigham Young said, “Some of the Witnesses of the Book of Mormon, who handled the plates and conversed with the angels of God, were afterwards left to doubt and to disbelieve that they had ever seen an angel.” (Journal of Discourses, Vol 7, page 164, 1859, Brigham Young.)
All three witnesses were eventually excommunicated from the Mormon church.
Two of the three witnesses who were excommunicated from the Mormon church later returned to the church after denying their testimony. Imagine if any one of the apostles denied their witness that Jesus rose from the dead, were kicked out of the early church, then returned again.
Their testimony would be of no value. Remember that all three denied the Mormon faith at one point, and one never came back to the Mormon church going to his grave denying his testimony, yet Mormons still use his testimony for the book of Mormon. In fact, David Whitmer never returned to the LDS church that he was a witness for, but joined splinter groups that denied the original LDS church he was first a member of.
is this fact or fiction Fat…?
 
If you lived long enough to learn all the knowledge there was, what would you be called? If you had all the knowledge there was, could you say to a mountain move and it would move? If you had all the knowledge there was, could you know the past present and future. If you had all knowledge, could you reach perfection? Stop being so narrow minded. I am not asking you to believe anything, and this is not part of our doctrine.
You don’t move mountains with knowledge. Where did the mountain come from that you desire to move?
 
Nowhere in that biased article does it say 99%

Now, I provided you with 2 cases where changes were doctrinal, and stated that I would start with just 2. Do you want me to provide more?

I’ll be happy if you can answer the 2 I asked about earlier.

Again, show me where you got 99%, because it sure wasn’t mentioned in the link you provided.
You know what is funny, I have provided you with ample information. If you can not read it yourself and find your own answers, I can not help you. Saying i have not answer the question when I have repeadedly is getting really boring. You have never answered any my questions and I have answered yours everytime. I will not respond to you until you answer my questions
 
Fat,

Non-belief in the Eucharist is another area where the LDS has no proof, and not only no proof, but stubbornly ignores the documented history of the Church, just as there was no great apostasy. This is simply a fable (: a fictitious narrative or statement)

2 Timothy 4

3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

So you believe in Jesus words on baptism being needed for salvation but disbelieve his words on the Eucharist. You thus believe Christ taught in error or all 12 disciples heard him in error as the believe in the real presence in the Eucharist was believed through out the church, wherever the apostles went to preach the gospel. There was no belief in a symbolic Eucharist. The “great crowds” left him and Jesus never corrected them, nor his apostles.

So do you believe the great apostasy occured with Christ still on earth?

Tract to read… catholic.com/tracts/christ-in-the-eucharist

**Fat, do you remember Ronald Reagan? You struggle with God being eternal, and being everywhere at once. Reagan says it better than me.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=t3GnWTy8Ebg**
I have provided proof there was an apostasy. If you don’t want to believe it that is fine. I certainly did not come here to prove to you that you were wrong, but only try to correct misinformation about our beliefs, and to learn from you guys. I have learned a lot believe me. Some things are still confusing and I am trying to piece your belief together to help me understand why you believe it. It is not logical to me but I was raised in a different culture, and a different train of thought. It may seem logic to you. It may seem alright to accept teachings that are not found in the Bible or in any canon of Scripture. That is okay because I believe there is more scripture than what is in the Bible or the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants or the Pearl of Great Price. I believe in all of God’s words. But it has to come from his prophets of God, not those who were of the lower callings than prophets. Not from trying to interpret what is in God’s words. You accept it. I don’t.
Code:
    People here have told me that even though some of the Popes have been known to lie, cheat, murder, commit adultery, etc. that did not take away from the churches authority at all because there were enough bishops and cardinals to smooth things over with God and keep the line of authority intact. Does this make sense? And yet we believe there was a  restoration and that it was brought about by a imperfect man who has been accused of all sorts of weaknesses. Some say this is proof the restoration never took place. Yet it is still here and is the fastest growing convert church in the world. And so when those here who have brought up such petty things and make them into something they are not, just makes me ponder if those who attack really cannot see what they are doing, and the hypocrisy that happens here.
Look I have prayed to God and he has answered my prayer. I would say that there are few here that have prayed to God to know if the Catholic church is the right church. If they have, then how was it manfiest to them? Simple question
 
You know what is funny, I have provided you with ample information. If you can not read it yourself and find your own answers, I can not help you. Saying i have not answer the question when I have repeadedly is getting really boring. You have never answered any my questions and I have answered yours everytime. I will not respond to you until you answer my questions
LOL, ok, it’s your story, you tell it any way you want.

You say you have “studied” this, but evidently, none of it has sunk in.

You made a statement about celibate priests being a doctrine not found in the Bible, and that was soundly shot down (by me, and many others), so I don’t know where you get off saying I haven’t answered you.

Now, again, I read that article, and I even did a word search using “99”, “ninety-nine”, as well as “%”, and “percent”, and nowhere in that article does it support your so called factual statement.

If you would actually read, and try to comprehend, you would see that what you stated is not in there.

Also, if you would read, I am not the only one asking you for references for your statements.

It is you that is being intellectually dishonest here, as has been pointed out earlier.

You make unfounded claims, don’t back them up, and expect them to stand. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: Sorry, ain’t gonna happen.

When you are ready to put your big boy pants on, and engage in a true discussion, with references to back up your “statements”, let us know. 👍
 
LOL, ok, it’s your story, you tell it any way you want.

You say you have “studied” this, but evidently, none of it has sunk in.

You made a statement about celibate priests being a doctrine not found in the Bible, and that was soundly shot down (by me, and many others), so I don’t know where you get off saying I haven’t answered you.

Now, again, I read that article, and I even did a word search using “99”, “ninety-nine”, as well as “%”, and “percent”, and nowhere in that article does it support your so called factual statement.

If you would actually read, and try to comprehend, you would see that what you stated is not in there.

Also, if you would read, I am not the only one asking you for references for your statements.

It is you that is being intellectually dishonest here.

You make unfounded claims, don’t back them up, and expect them to stand. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: Sorry, ain’t gonna happen.

When you are ready to put your big boy pants on, and engage in a true discussion, with references to back up your “statements”, let us know. 👍
I am being intellectually dishonest??? What more do you want? You want to trip me up on each and every word I say?? Grow up… You sound like a certain group in the New Testiment that tried to trip Christ up in his own words. I am not certainly perfect. I am not going to respond to you any more.
 
LOL, ok, it’s your story, you tell it any way you want.

You say you have “studied” this, but evidently, none of it has sunk in.

You made a statement about celibate priests being a doctrine not found in the Bible, and that was soundly shot down (by me, and many others), so I don’t know where you get off saying I haven’t answered you.

Now, again, I read that article, and I even did a word search using “99”, “ninety-nine”, as well as “%”, and “percent”, and nowhere in that article does it support your so called factual statement.

If you would actually read, and try to comprehend, you would see that what you stated is not in there.

Also, if you would read, I am not the only one asking you for references for your statements.

It is you that is being intellectually dishonest here, as has been pointed out earlier.

You make unfounded claims, don’t back them up, and expect them to stand. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: Sorry, ain’t gonna happen.

When you are ready to put your big boy pants on, and engage in a true discussion, with references to back up your “statements”, let us know. 👍
You want to put your big boy pants on, then go to a Mormon website and see if you can keep up with it. Perhaps you have more time than I do. I don’t know. But I am sure you would not feel as safe as you feel here amoung your friends. Try leaving the nest and fly on your own.
 
Fat,

You appear to have had a change of heart…

In another post you say that you are not trying to convince anyone to change their mind. I find that statement suspect. You believe that people lie and when you are directed to things that are not true you offer no support for what you believe and interpret that as an attack. It is difficult to be in your position because to admit that you have been lied to as all Mormons that leave the LDS finally do…it is like taking the rug out from under your feet. That cannot be pleasant.

No one wants to destroy the mormon church. It is doing that by professing things that are not true. Have you not read of all the untruths and lies that LDS has through the ages. I posted them before. Would you like to see them again?

You have attacked the Catholic beliefs, presented LDS beliefs, in my opinion justifying and not explaining them and you say you love to learn…it appears you love to teach and here feel sad for Catholics offfering prayer…when did you have a change of heart?

Sadness is a product of the human condition. Sadness is common among all. Sadness is shared when those that are sad cannot recognize their own condition of sadness and then offer no aid to resolution of sadness. I am sad. Sadness creates a catalyst for change. My prayer is that all that recognize their own sadness can look to see what it is that causes their sadness. It is sad that people that tell others that they are sad over their condition do not examine their own condition in the sadness of what it is they ask others to enjoy and that is truly sad. Their is no joy in untruth.
I did not want to attack your beliefs. It was crammed down my throat with multiple attacks from every front. I am human and when pushed I push back. I certainly did not want to try and convince anyone I am right and they are wrong. But that is what it has turned into. I will do better… I can honestly tell you that I am more happy than I was when I did not believe. I find much comfort knowing that if I continue to do my best, that I will be in Heaven with my Father through the sacrifice of his Son whom I can not even approach to understand what he has done for me and the world. I know that God has revealed more truth to the earth. I am glad that you feel that you are on the right path. I believe that God will reward you with the promise he has made to all that do their best. I just believe God has given more to us, and with that more will be given. I do not do this because he will give me more, but because I love Christ, and I want to follow him in all things. Are there sad people? You bet. Are there sad Catholics, you bet. Are there sad mormons, you bet. The only difference between you and me is that we believe differently about religion.
 
You want to put your big boy pants on, then go to a Mormon website and see if you can keep up with it. Perhaps you have more time than I do. I don’t know. But I am sure you would not feel as safe as you feel here amoung your friends. Try leaving the nest and fly on your own.
Trust me, I am on some mormon sites, including the overly heavy handed one at mormon dialogue. If you can call it that.

I hold up quite well, and poke many a hole in mormon theology over there also. 👍

How original of a comeback with the big boy pants. You should be so proud…LOL

But yet, you still can’t show anything that backs up your 99% comment, or refutes the two examples of BoM doctrinal changes…hmmmmm

So much for studying. 🤷
 
I did not want to attack your beliefs. It was crammed down my throat with multiple attacks from every front. I am human and when pushed I push back. I certainly did not want to try and convince anyone I am right and they are wrong. But that is what it has turned into. I will do better… I can honestly tell you that I am more happy than I was when I did not believe. I find much comfort knowing that if I continue to do my best, that I will be in Heaven with my Father through the sacrifice of his Son whom I can not even approach to understand what he has done for me and the world. I know that God has revealed more truth to the earth. I am glad that you feel that you are on the right path. I believe that God will reward you with the promise he has made to all that do their best. I just believe God has given more to us, and with that more will be given. I do not do this because he will give me more, but because I love Christ, and I want to follow him in all things. Are there sad people? You bet. Are there sad Catholics, you bet. Are there sad mormons, you bet. The only difference between you and me is that we believe differently about religion.
I do not know you, and I don’t feel that you attacked our beliefs, though I feel as this topic has gone on, responses have become more… aggressive, I suppose would be a good word. I do not feel anyone has “crammed” anything down anyone’s throat, rather expressed what we believe and will defend what we believe as you have done. That is the point of discussion and debate is it not?
It is good that you are happier now that you believe. One thing I have a problem with is the air of arrogance with some LDS members… In your statement above, “God has given more to us…” Further, my wife is LDS, I have listened to a lot of the talks, and this air of arrogance permeates a lot of what I hear. “We are the only church… fill in blank.” “No other church… x, y, z.” And then as soon as anyone provides evidence, scriptural and otherwise, that would be against an LDS belief, we are attacking.
Can you at least understand where some of us would be coming from.
I apologize if my rant went a little off topic…I’m not in a good place in my mind today, even though it is my birthday, I won’t see my wife or kids until late this evening, if the kids aren’t already in bed.
 
Fatboys…

Last year or so, we were reading here the so called Great Apostasy happened after the death of the last apostle, John, and that he was still roaming the earth…sounded contradictory.

You talk about celibacy…yes…the Mormon take on the apostasy is actually pointed at the Christian priesthood. (‘The Christian Church’ is what Calvin called the universal Church when he was starting his own form of Christianity, reacting to the excesses of those reformers before him.)

There was a movement by Spanish priests to have celibacy in the late 300’s. There were married priests in later ancient times who were married but left their wives or had affairs, and this scandalized the faithful.

And before that, St. John the Evangelist, Christ’s beloved apostle was celibate. There were many followers, many martyrs who died because they did not want to have sex, they wanted to be celibate and virgin for the Lord in the first 300 years of Christianity.

St. Paul, the evangelist to the Gentiles was likewise celibate.

So then are St. John the Evangelist and St. Paul and the ancient martyrs who endured great suffering all apostates because they did not have sex???
 
I have provided proof there was an apostasy.
Fat - I say this with all love: you have provide conjecture not proof. This is contrasted with the documented history of the early church. When one reads the early church fathers, one sees a Catholic church in theology, both in their letters and their homilies…including but not limited to sacramental baptism, annointing of the sick and the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. The Catholic mass was practiced from the earliest times w/readings & prayers followed by receiving the Eucharist. But also…an understanding of the Trinity and a Catholic church structure of Popes, Bishops, Priests and Deacons.
I have learned a lot believe me. Some things are still confusing and I am trying to piece your belief together to help me understand why you believe it.
Fat, your honesty is respected. A couple of ways to learn more outside of CAF would be a few book suggestions…and I would recommend stopping by your local Catholic church and speaking with a priest. The Cathedral of the Madeleine in SLC is a wonderful place to go to in this regards and only a stones throw or two from the LDS temple. RebeccaJ can speak more about this church and ways of continuing to explore the Catholic faith…milk, meat and potatoes included.

Here’s one of my favorite videos…at the Cathedral with LDS musicians. Talk about love of neighbor. youtube.com/watch?v=0RIc6mwDRaQ
It may seem alright to accept teachings that are not found in the Bible or in any canon of Scripture.
The bible comes from the church and tradition…not the other way around. Remember 1 Timothy 3:15…the Church is the Bulwark and Foundation of Truth. The Church gave us the bible…to be used at Mass…to have consistent set of readings across the world. The bible cost about 3 years wages so it was not found in homes. Only in churches and later places of education.
That is okay because I believe there is more scripture than what is in the Bible or the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants or the Pearl of Great Price. I believe in all of God’s words. But it has to come from his prophets of God, not those who were of the lower callings than prophets. Not from trying to interpret what is in God’s words. You accept it. I don’t.
The BoM, D&C and PGP are all lies…brought forth by a false prophet with a premise that the Catholic church went into apostasy and was the whore of babylon. If you can’t understand that there was never an apostasy - and that the Catholic church is not the whore of babylon, then understanding the Catholic faith becomes more difficult…
People here have told me that even though some of the Popes have been known to lie, cheat, murder, commit adultery, etc. that did not take away from the churches authority at all because there were enough bishops and cardinals to smooth things over with God and keep the line of authority intact. Does this make sense?
The Church has had some “whoppers” who commited great personal sins. But that said, Catholic doctrine did not change. Christ protects the Church from doctrinal error, not sinners.
Yet it is still here and is the fastest growing convert church in the world.
Catholic church has 1.2B…Christ said his church would be the Lamp on the Lampstand…and that he would be with his church until the end of time. Contradiction: he would be with it until the end of time but let it fall into apostasy for 1800 years? No… Every new Protestant church that opens up has a growth rate faster than LDS. They start at “0”.
Look I have prayed to God and he has answered my prayer. I would say that there are few here that have prayed to God to know if the Catholic church is the right church. If they have, then how was it manfiest to them? Simple question
Fats, the Catholic church is manifest through scripture, history, faith and reason. That’s how we know. You can also look at the extraordinary including incorruptable saints (google this) and apparitions of the Virgin Mary (google Fatima and Lourdes as examples). And yes, there are plenty of protestant doubters.

Fats, continue on and you will be a CAF Sr. Member soon enough. You are one tough farmer. Do not get discouraged…but I would encourage you to visit a Catholic church as I said above. Pray there and see what happens…“ask and seek” too from those there that can help answer your questions 1:1. If you live near Provo, I have another personal contact for you that I will PM if you want.
 
even though it is my birthday, I won’t see my wife or kids until late this evening, if the kids aren’t already in bed.
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you…happy birthday to Ninja. Happy birthday to you.:okpeople::okpeople:
 
The center and summit of our faith in Christ is the Eucharist.

The Mormons believe that the apostasy was caused by the universal Christian priesthood.

We receive the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ, of Which, nothing in this world can be compared.

Are you saying that having sex is greater than receiving the Eucharist???

For us to receive the Eucharist, the priest must be properly ordained, he must follow all the steps so that Christ Himself can work through him to become present to us in the sacrament. Whether the priest has sex or not is irrelevant.

It is Christ Himself Who works through the priest and the sacraments to give us the life of sanctifying grace. It has nothing to do with whether or not we have sex.

Jesus said heaven is not the place for marrying. He said that. Jesus does not lie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top