Republicans are the ones putting in voter ID laws to prevent fraudulent voters, and Democrats are the ones opposed to it. Where do you think the fraudulent voters are? Obviously, they are on the side opposing voter ID laws.
Excellent questions. Does anyone who supports this law care to address them?Hold that thought and don’t let the topic change…What makes this woman special? Will that special treatment be available to other elders? What does a voter have to do to get the voter regulations violated in their favor AND most importantly, how is photo ID a guarantee against fraud if it can be obtained without a voter meeting the requirements? I’m confused…What values exactly are at play here?
Hold that thought and don’t let the topic change…What makes this woman special? Will that special treatment be available to other elders? What does a voter have to do to get the voter regulations violated in their favor AND most importantly, how is photo ID a guarantee against fraud if it can be obtained without a voter meeting the requirements? I’m confused…
From the article linked in the OP: State officials called it an unplanned exercise in what they’ve been saying for weeks: Clerks behind counters at Pennsylvania Department of Transportation centers can take age and other factors into consideration when granting exceptions to the list of documents the law requires, licensing bureau director Janet Dolan said.
It sounds like thge state is bending over backwards to get people what is required to comply with the law.
Now thats an interesting statement considering the fact that the State admitted that there was no evidence of in-person voter fraud in the first place nor do they have any reason to believe that it would occur in this election.
You keep using no evidence of voter fraud like the government goes through every vote to see if it’s valid. There can be a lot of voter fraud and no one would know it.
There could also be unicorns ballroom dancing on Pluto and we wouldn’t know that either. If you specifically state in a legal document that you have no reason to believe that voter fraud will occur then there are obviously other motives behind the law.
Could be, but unicorns ballroom dancing on Pluto don’t have any impact on elections.
That “fraudulent voting contingent” doesn’t exist according to the State of Pennsylvania and it doesn’t matter which party disenfranchisement would benefit; it’s wrong, illegal, unconstitutional, and I hope PA is ravaged in the courts when it occurs in November. Don’t forget that the constitutionality of such laws was only upheld on the condition that disenfranchisement does not occur in the election.
If I suspect someone is going to shoot you, should I go to the police with my suspicions or just keep my mouth shut.
But, the Democrats claim that it will benefit the Republicans…with no evidence. Apparently, that lack of evidence doesn’t matter.
The State pointed out that it has no suspicion or belief that in-person voter fraud has occurred in the past or would occur in this election if the law were to be overturned.
Where is all this disenfranchisement? You’d think Democrats are never allowed to vote.
As has been pointed out to you; the law was upheld on the condition that no disenfranchisement occurs. When it does at the polls that law will be scuttled in the blink of an eye.
Yep. So, the burden is on you to show real disenfranchisement…not on evidence of voter fraud. Ball’s in your court. As the OP of this thread shows, the claims so far are bogus. Again, obviously Democrats are just afraid that their illegitimate voters won’t be able to vote this year…
You mean when the Democrats find someone who’s never voted in their 50 or so years of life, and pay them a bunch of money to say they were barred from voting?
Those “illegitimate voters” don’t exist but I do find it interesting that the Democrats seem to be the only ones fighting for the right of the elderly, which generally swing to the right, to vote.
No, I mean the thousands of elderly men and women in the State who have voted for decades without any need of a photo-ID but will be forced to sit this one out because of the State’s shoddy record keeping.
If you say so…it’s the only logical explanation I can come up with for the Democrats fighting voter ID and claiming that Republicans benefit from voter ID.
