I don’t understand why a God would choose to be tortured and die for us. I don’t see it as love. Definitely God could have chosen anything else. And just because he chose a more painful bloody way to “save us” doesn’t mean there is more love in it or that we should somehow be more than happy kful and indebted. God shouldn’t have made us anyway if he didn’t want us to be with him forever. It is not our fault we were born with concupiscence. Not our choice that God chose a more painful way. His choice to make us- a “free gift”. I don’t see why he should expect a ton of love and gratitude. I don’t want to be ride but it seems almost stupid that he chose to save us by being tortured to death.
Of course God refers to the Christian God
Well, it could be the only way to really create a sentient being that could make its own choices and learn to love in a way that really is a free response and isn’t some mechanical instinctual reaction is to allow people to make very bad choices that are contrary to plain reality. If God is love and love is the plain reality of the universe but love involves an act of sentient will, then making sentient beings could just logically have to involve letting those beings make choices rooted in unreality, choices that cause pain and suffering, choices that are contrary to the truth about themselves. Well, if you’re going to make someone face that kind of reality, would you be loving if you weren’t willing to go through that reality yourself in order to save them from the use of their free will that isn’t love?
That’s one thought exercise, but you can see that the whole concept of the Redemption really isn’t as outlandish as it might sound on first glance.
When we say God is all-Powerful, we don’t mean God can act in a way that is counter to God’s own nature. If the nature of God is love, you can see where there could have to be Persons in the Godhead, because love is, by its nature, a relational matter. One doesn’t have a “relationship” with oneself.
Sometimes, in science, we find that the answer we think ought to be the answer because it is straightforward and makes so much sense just can’t be the answer, because reality is weird and straightforward explanations fail to explain reality. Reality has kinks and wrinkles that you wouldn’t imagine. Reality is literally awe-inspiring. It is wonderful. It is not pat or simple. So, whatever religion is true, expect it to be as free from the pat and the straight-forward and the intellectually not-taxing as physical reality is. It would only make sense, right?