Let Mormons be Mormon and Catholics be Catholics

  • Thread starter Thread starter why_me
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That is falsehood.

zerinus
is it? You believe all other churches do not have the fullness of truth in them, except yours. So you look down at the others. It is a common mormon malady. pretend all you want I think it is quite evident… People are not dumb they can see it.
 
I did read it. I has simply got the wrong end of the stick with regard to the meaning of “vain repetition”.

zerinus
the wrong end of the stick how? I think you enjoy offending others here.
 
whatever you want to call it it is still vain repitition and it is worse because you claim it as an ordinance. I wasn’t speaking of baptismal prayer either and you know it. . everything done in the temple is vain repetition. Washing and anointing is vain repetition, so is the endowment. What amazes me is how so many LDS can’t admit to the truth of the matter.
All I can say is that you are incapable of understanding plain reason. I had already explained the meaning of “vain repetition” in this post:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=2071798&postcount=204

There is a world of difference between that, and the sacraments, or ordinances, performed in the Temple—or outside the temple, for that matter—hence my reference to baptism. We perform baptisms inside the Temple; and we also perform baptisms outside the temple. There is no difference, sacramentally, between baptisms performed in the Temple and those performed outside it—except that one is for the living, and the other is for the dead. Likewise we also perform confirmations and priesthood ordinations, both inside as well as outside the Temple; and there is no sacramental difference between them either. These ordinances are not prayers, they are ordinances; and we perform each ordinance for each individual once, not a hundred times—be they for the living or for the dead. That is not “vain repetition”. How do you think we should baptize people then? Change the formula every time?

There are also ordinances that are performed only inside the Temple, not outside it, such as the Endowment and washing and anointing; and the same criteria apply to them. We perform each ordinance for each individual once. We don’t change the ordinance every time we perform it. That is not “vain repetition”.

zerinus
 
is it? You believe all other churches do not have the fullness of truth in them, except yours. So you look down at the others. It is a common mormon malady. pretend all you want I think it is quite evident… People are not dumb they can see it.
The idiocy seems repeatedly to be coming from you. Every church on earth thinks that it is the right one; otherwise there would be no point in its existence. If the Lutherans believed that Catholicism is better, or even as good, why not disband Lutheranism and become Catholics? If Catholics believed that Lutheranism is better, or even as good, why not disband Catholicism and become Lutherans? The same goes for every other religion. Mormonism is no different. We believe that we have all the truth; but that does not translate into despising other religions. The Catholics may despise non-Catholic religions; the Lutherans may despise non-Lutheran religions; the Moslems may despise non-Moslem religions. But let me assure you as an LDS that we do not despise other religions.

zerinus
 
the wrong end of the stick how?
For the reason that I explained in post #204. That is the correct meaning of “vain repetition,” not what it says in that article.
I think you enjoy offending others here.
That is a stupid thing to say. Explaining to people the correct meaning of things is not offending them.

zerinus
 
You pray to her, don’t you? Prayer is an act of worship. You pray to God. You don’t pray to Mary or the Saints.

zerinus
No way zerinus. I am often very patient with you but you are so wrong on this one it isn’t funny.

You know Catholics believe in intercession.

Praying is asking for something, we use Mary and the saints to intercede, that is, we ask them to help us ask God.

We believe only God can answer our prayers, but we believe others in Heaven can help us, just as people on earth can help us, like when we say “please pray for me”.

If we are only to ask God to help us, why would we be allowed to ask friends to ask God to help us too?
 
You know Catholics believe in intercession.

Praying is asking for something, we use Mary and the saints to intercede, that is, we ask them to help us ask God.
The Bible tells us that we only have one intercessor in heaven, and that is Jesus Christ:

1 Timothy 2:

5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus

Romans 8:

34 Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.

Hebrews 7:

25 Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.

That is the only intercession that is required. The Book of Mormon also confirms this teaching:

2 Nephi 2:

9 Wherefore, he is the firstfruits unto God, inasmuch as he shall make intercession for all the children of men; and they that believe in him shall be saved.

Mosiah 14:

[Quoting from Isaiah]
12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death; and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bore the sins of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

Mosiah 15:

8 And thus God breaketh the bands of death, having gained the victory over death; giving the Son power to make intercession for the children of men

Jesus is in fact the only one that is qualified, by virtue of His atoning sacrifice, to be our intercessor in heaven. To appeal to Mary or the Saints for intercession borders on the sacrilege. It is like losing faith in Jesus Christ, and in the sufficiency of His atonement and intercession.
We believe only God can answer our prayers, but we believe others in Heaven can help us, just as people on earth can help us, like when we say “please pray for me”.

If we are only to ask God to help us, why would we be allowed to ask friends to ask God to help us too?
Prayer is not the same as asking your friends here on earth to help you. Your friends are people you can see, and whom you can talk to and know that they can hear. Prayer is an act of faith. It is an appeal to a supernatural being whom you do not see, but whom you believe in faith is able to hear and answer. I don’t know of any instance in the scriptures where one is supposed to appeal to any other being in heaven than the supreme, omnipotent God for assistance. Jesus talked a lot about prayer in the Gospels; but the object of His prayers was always the one God, not anything else. It is contrary to the whole order of things that God has established in the Bible, both the OT as well as the NT.

zerinus
 
Very Protestant interpretations.

Except those from the Book of Mormon. Protestants wouldn’t touch the BoM with a ten foot pole.
 
Very Protestant interpretations.

Except those from the Book of Mormon. Protestants wouldn’t touch the BoM with a ten foot pole.
We don’t claim to have a monopoly of good ideas. The Catholic Church is so blatantly wrong on some doctrinal matters that it is to be expected that other people before us should have identified them. The Protestants are right about many errors that they have identified in Catholicism; and the Catholics are right about many errors they have identified in Protestantism; and we are right about many errors that we have identified in both.

zerinus
 
The Bible tells us that we only have one intercessor in heaven, and that is Jesus Christ:

1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus
Mediator isn’t intercessor
40.png
zerinus:
Romans 8:

34 Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.Hebrews 7:25 Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.
That doesn’t say “only intercessor”
40.png
zerinus:
Jesus is in fact the only one that is qualified, by virtue of His atoning sacrifice, to be our intercessor in heaven. To appeal to Mary or the Saints for intercession borders on the sacrilege. It is like losing faith in Jesus Christ, and in the sufficiency of His atonement and intercession.
It is asking for Jesus’ help that we pray, so how is that losing faith?
40.png
zerinus:
Prayer is not the same as asking your friends here on earth to help you. Your friends are people you can see, and whom you can talk to and know that they can hear. Prayer is an act of faith. It is an appeal to a supernatural being whom you do not see, but whom you believe in faith is able to hear and answer. I don’t know of any instance in the scriptures where one is supposed to appeal to any other being in heaven than the supreme, omnipotent God for assistance. Jesus talked a lot about prayer in the Gospels; but the object of His prayers was always the one God, not anything else. It is contrary to the whole order of things that God has established in the Bible, both the OT as well as the NT.
We believe Mary and the Saints are our friends as well.
Our faith is so strong that we know they can hear and answer us.

Yes, Jesus did talk a lot about prayers, and the object of His prayers was God.

Same as our prayers. It is always God we want to answer them. Praying to Mary and the Saints is like getting a petition signed, and passing it on.
 
All I can say is that you are incapable of understanding plain reason. I had already explained the meaning of “vain repetition” in this post:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=2071798&postcount=204

There is a world of difference between that, and the sacraments, or ordinances, performed in the Temple—or outside the temple, for that matter—hence my reference to baptism. We perform baptisms inside the Temple; and we also perform baptisms outside the temple. There is no difference, sacramentally, between baptisms performed in the Temple and those performed outside it—except that one is for the living, and the other is for the dead. Likewise we also perform confirmations and priesthood ordinations, both inside as well as outside the Temple; and there is no sacramental difference between them either. These ordinances are not prayers, they are ordinances; and we perform each ordinance for each individual once, not a hundred times—be they for the living or for the dead. That is not “vain repetition”. How do you think we should baptize people then? Change the formula every time?

There are also ordinances that are performed only inside the Temple, not outside it, such as the Endowment and washing and anointing; and the same criteria apply to them. We perform each ordinance for each individual once. We don’t change the ordinance every time we perform it. That is not “vain repetition”.

zerinus
I understood so much more than you give me credit for. I also understand you believe that your way is correct and everyone else is wrong in regards to this. You are prideful in your responses and yet you harm your own spirituality by refusing to admit this to yourself. For example you insist your defintion of vain repetition is the only correct definition. And you do not need to lecture me on the Temple. I was a Temple worker for years I know very well what goes on inside them. You are welcome to see it the way you do but you are in no place to state it is any different for Catholics than it is for the LDS.

You really need to get a grasp on your arrogancy if not for anyone else but for your own welfare.
 
For the reason that I explained in post #204. That is the correct meaning of “vain repetition,” not what it says in that article.

That is a stupid thing to say. Explaining to people the correct meaning of things is not offending them.

zerinus
And who are you to dviine the correct interpretation? Your response was only your opinion on the meaning nothing more.
 
The idiocy seems repeatedly to be coming from you. Every church on earth thinks that it is the right one; otherwise there would be no point in its existence. If the Lutherans believed that Catholicism is better, or even as good, why not disband Lutheranism and become Catholics? If Catholics believed that Lutheranism is better, or even as good, why not disband Catholicism and become Lutherans? The same goes for every other religion. Mormonism is no different. We believe that we have all the truth; but that does not translate into despising other religions. The Catholics may despise non-Catholic religions; the Lutherans may despise non-Lutheran religions; the Moslems may despise non-Moslem religions. But let me assure you as an LDS that we do not despise other religions.

zerinus
Yes please continue to excuse your actions by placing the errors on someone else.
 
We don’t claim to have a monopoly of good ideas. The Catholic Church is so blatantly wrong on some doctrinal matters that it is to be expected that other people before us should have identified them. The Protestants are right about many errors that they have identified in Catholicism; and the Catholics are right about many errors they have identified in Protestantism; and we are right about many errors that we have identified in both.

zerinus
And the LDS are wrong on most doctrinal matters.
 
Mediator isn’t intercessor
Jesus qualifies to be our intercessor by virtue of His mediation role, which comes by virtue of His atoning sacrifice. Show me one verse in the Bible which teaches, suggest, or implies any other mediator or intercessor between God and man that Jesus Christ.
That doesn’t say “only intercessor”
It does. If others were included, they would have been mentioned. Jesus is the only Redeemer, the only mediator, the only propitiation, hence the only intercessor. Show me one passage in the Bible that mentions any other.
It is asking for Jesus’ help that we pray, so how is that losing faith?
You are not. You are asking Mary’s help, or the Saints’ help, to intercede on your behalf to Jesus or to God. That is unbiblical and wrong.
We believe Mary and the Saints are our friends as well.
Then wait until you get there, and ask them if they can help. You don’t pray to them. You pray to God.
Our faith is so strong that we know they can hear and answer us.
Your faith is strong in whom? In Mary and the Saints? As Paul said: “Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?” (1 Corinthians 1:12.) Likewise I say, was Mary crucified for you? Or were ye baptized in the name of the Saints? There is only one Intercessor and object of faith mentioned in the Bible, and that is Jesus Christ. Show me one passage in the Bible that mentions, or implies, another.
Yes, Jesus did talk a lot about prayers, and the object of His prayers was God. Same as our prayers.
No, you pray to Mary and the Saints. That is not the same as praying to God.
It is always God we want to answer them.
Then you should pray to Him direct, instead of going through Mary. Where does it say in the Bible that you need to do that.
Praying to Mary and the Saints is like getting a petition signed, and passing it on.
Show me a verse in the Bible that says you need to do that. I don’t know of any that even implies it.

zerinus
 
Mediator isn’t intercessor

That doesn’t say “only intercessor”

It is asking for Jesus’ help that we pray, so how is that losing faith?

We believe Mary and the Saints are our friends as well.
Our faith is so strong that we know they can hear and answer us.

Yes, Jesus did talk a lot about prayers, and the object of His prayers was God.

Same as our prayers. It is always God we want to answer them. Praying to Mary and the Saints is like getting a petition signed, and passing it on.
The problem comes in on things like this when one doesn’t understand the unity of God. We are all one with him. 🙂
Good answers btw.
 
I understood so much more than you give me credit for. I also understand you believe that your way is correct and everyone else is wrong in regards to this. You are prideful in your responses and yet you harm your own spirituality by refusing to admit this to yourself. For example you insist your defintion of vain repetition is the only correct definition. And you do not need to lecture me on the Temple. I was a Temple worker for years I know very well what goes on inside them. You are welcome to see it the way you do but you are in no place to state it is any different for Catholics than it is for the LDS.

You really need to get a grasp on your arrogancy if not for anyone else but for your own welfare.
It is obvious that you are at your wit’s end. You are at the end of your tether. You are incapable of responding to a direct theological challenge, therefore you resort to personal attacks.

zerinus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top