Lipinski beats challenger

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertmidwest
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
jagged said:
I did like Obama’s policy in that region
Click to expand...
Indiscriminate bombing of inhabited places with hellfire missiles you like, but you don’t like waterboarding three people that left them unharmed. Dem ethical standards couldn’t be more upside-down.
 
jagged said:
I don’t know. I guess we’ll have to figure out if we count the blacks he denied housing to and then the blacks that were falsely accused of rape that he called for the death penalty (and kept on it even after they were proven innocent) and then do we add in the Hispanics that were repressed by Arpaio that Trump pardoned or not?
Click to expand...
Let us know how many blacks he actually denied housing to, and that it wasn’t just a technical violation. I recall being accused of being discriminatory years ago when I was in banking. I told the examiners there weren’t any minorities in the town I was then in, and there werent’. They went around the town looking and didn’t find any. But they wrote me up anyway. Without real evidence, I’m not buying this slander.

And you falsely accused him of racism, so why are you sitting there in judgment of his having called for the death penalty for people law enforcement was saying were the perps? You’re no better. In fact, you don’t have any reason at all to accuse him.

And how many Hispanics were actually oppressed by Arpaio? Arpaio was held in contempt because he refused to stop stopping and checking drivers who bore all the signs of being illegals. That’s oppression? I have been stopped for nothing too, but just accepted it that’s a part of law enforcement. But oh, when it’s an illegal that’s stopped, somebody needs to go to jail for doing it.
 
If the mid terms turn into a democrat wave, I wouldn’t hinge too much on the pro Trump base.
 
niceatheist said:
If the mid terms turn into a democrat wave, I wouldn’t hinge too much on the pro Trump base.
Click to expand...
One should not confuse the “National Review” type Repubs or the “Rand Paul” types or the “Ted Cruz” contingent as being the bulk of conservative Repubs.
 
Ridgerunner said:
One should not confuse the “National Review” type Repubs or the “Rand Paul” types or the “Ted Cruz” contingent as being the bulk of conservative Repubs.
Click to expand...
One should not confuse Donald Trump with being a conservative Repub.
 
Ridgerunner said:
And as the Popes have said, we can’t vote for an abortion-supporting candidate unless there is a "proportionately grave’ reason to do so. What “proportionately grave” Dem issue outweighs killing innocent children?
Click to expand...
That question is for each person to answer for themselves. They don’t need to justify their answer to you or anyone else but the Lord.
 
As best I can tell, the Church is more interested in the why of our vote than the what. If we believe voting for a Republican will not do much to reduce abortion but that other mortal sins would be advanced, we shouldn’t vote for them. If we voted for any candidate because they were pro-choice or because they wanted to start a preventive war or what have you, then we’d be committing a mortal sin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top