G
gam197
Guest
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
Last edited:
I don’t even think she even formally represents Trump or his campaign at this point. She’s just some kind of roving lawyer-at-large.Is she explaining why she thinks Detroit is in Wisconsin?
She doesn’t, they cut her loose.I don’t even think she even formally represents Trump or his campaign at this point. She’s just some kind of roving lawyer-at-large.
She also doesn’t represent the rep here in WI whose name she used as a plaintiff.I don’t even think she even formally represents Trump or his campaign at this point.
Or, maybe their paranoia meter is set lower.I think at this stage anyone who doesn’t believe that big tech are manipulating humanity has a blindfold on.
Fact: CNN’s numbers are not “official”,. Trump did not “lose” one vote because of what was on CNN’s screen. Sometimes errors are made in initial reports.President Trump’s vote count, at one point, actually dropped on CNN’s screen. check at 4:30
Year | Republican | Democratic | Third Parties |
---|---|---|---|
2020 | 30.7% 264,149 | 68.1% 587,074 | 1.2% 10,598 |
2016 | 29.3% 228,993 | 66.4% 519,444 | 4.3% 34,282 |
2012 | 26.1% 213,814 | 72.8% 595,846 | 1.0% 8,476 |
2008 | 24.6% 219,582 | 74.0% 660,085 | 1.4% 12,064 |
2004 | 29.8% 257,750 | 69.4% 600,047 | 0.8% 6,931 |
2000 | 29.0% 223,021 | 69.0% 530,414 | 2.0% 15,192 |
1996 | 24.0% 175,886 | 69.0% 504,466 | 7.0% 51,245 |
1992 | 27.0% 227,002 | 60.4% 508,464 | 12.7% 106,499 |
1988 | 39.0% 291,996 | 60.2% 450,222 | 0.8% 5,938 |
1984 | 42.3% 367,391 | 57.2% 496,632 | 0.5% 4,320 |
1980 | 35.4% 315,532 | 58.6% 522,024 | 6.0% 53,288 |
1976 | 38.2% 348,588 | 60.1% 548,767 | 1.7% 15,635 |
1972 | 45.1% 435,877 | 53.3% 514,913 | 1.7% 16,087 |
Accepting the absolute clear evidence of big tech’s crackdown on conservative content, their political biases, and left wing agendas is “paranoia”? Ok, I guess I’m extremely paranoid then!Or, maybe their paranoia meter is set lower.
Hypocrisy is on display here. It is “big tech” manipulating people, but if you do not agree you are blind? Do you not see that this sort of statement is also an attempt to manipulate the thinking of others? Then there are press conferences, and videos posted here on this thread. It is hypocritical to complain about manipulation by an attempt at manipulation.
No, crackdown on false content, not conservative content. Truth has no ideology, and lies that support a particular worldview are still lies.clear evidence of big tech’s crackdown on conservative content
I guess that’s why he keeps failing miserably in court - no hard facts on his side.Rudy is relying on hard facts