Live:: Atlanta Georgia, Lawyers Lin Wood and Sidney Powell Hold A Press Conference On Election

[whatistrue]

Whatever you have to keep telling yourself. Your guy lost fair and square and if all of these sworn affidavits were so significant why has every case his “stellar” legal team brought to court gotten tossed. Often by judges appointed by Trump.

 

[Feanor2]

Deep state. George Soros.

 

[Dan123]

And when vote count is 105% of registered voters (remembering that not all voters voted) then something is clearly wrong, at least to those with their eyes open.

It’s only 105% if you use the total registrations from before the actual election began instead of the number of people who actually registered. Basically if you mislead people about the denominator. I do find that wrong, but what I find wrong is the deceptive presentation.

As an aside, since the democrat party has zero interest in election fraud, this opens up a tremendous opportunity for the republicans. With the knowledge gained from studying the fraud, the republicans can now ensure that no democrat will ever be elected again. Pretty cool, huh?

Well since the Republicans vetoed several election security bills, perhaps Democrats worked out how to steal this election by studying how Trump stole the last one? Fits your theory, and I’ve presented as much evidence of fraud as anyone else has.

 

[pnewton]

Those who swear out affidavits under the penalty of perjury should be given some credibility. More credibility than mere opinion, right?

I would say that is totally dependent on what is in the affidavit. Also, the amount of credibility has to be balanced against the integrity of the person, the bias of the person, and the intelligence of the person. So yes, more credibility than a statement that is now sworn, but not necessarily enough to trust the person.