Live:: Atlanta Georgia, Lawyers Lin Wood and Sidney Powell Hold A Press Conference On Election

  • Thread starter Thread starter gam197
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
tomarin said:
Right because there is apparently no way Biden could win fair and square because Dear Leader is just that awesome!
Click to expand...
This only became an issue because of mail in ballots. It furthered the risk for more corruption than was already there.

Corruption had the potential to be full blown. No one knows.
 
Last edited:
gam197 said:
This only became an issue because of mail in ballots.
Click to expand...
You mean the same mail in ballots that have been used for multiple decades with no significant issues? Those mail in ballots?
 
gam197 said:
This only became an issue because of mail in ballots. It furthered the risk for more corruption than was already there.
Click to expand...
I would change this to say that it only became a problem when Trump saw he was going to lose the election, and he started to plant the seeds of a conspiracy against him.

It started with no proof. He just didn’t want to admit losing.

It continues with no proof.

There is no proof.

Biden won. Trump lost.
 
Paul, I am beginning to grasp after many weeks of reading election-denialist posts the mindset of the president’s most ardent supporters, which is that the evidence of fraud that is staring everyone in the face and that carries the most weight and the only one that really matters is the simple fact that Biden won the election, which is a physical impossibility like exceeding the speed of light.

As our friends in the UK might say, it’s bloody bonkers, mate.
 
Last edited:
What is true? Joe Biden is more popular among blacks than Obama?

Really?

Believe what you will.
 
And those who constantly harp and moan and groan about not seeing evidence presented to the media…
…will be the first to scream that the trial was not fair because of pre-trial publicity.
 
Seems to be a possible violation for sure. But in this case it appears to be to vote for the 2 republican Senators.
 
Dan123 said:
If there’s no proof of voter fraud, explain this: Florida attorney under investigation for registering to vote in Georgia, encouraging others to do the same – WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta
Click to expand...
This is an example of possible voter fraud.

If a million people follow the advice and register at the address of this guy’s cousin, then the original video will probably be used in a voter fraud case.

It does not have to be a million registrations, 15,000 would have been enough to sway the Presidential election.

Do you have any evidence of 15,000 people doing this to vote for Biden in Georgia? This type of scheme usually breaks 50-50 for the two candidates.
 
sealabeag said:
Accepting the absolute clear evidence of big tech’s crackdown on conservative content, their political biases, and left wing agendas is “paranoia”?
Click to expand...
Begs the question with the phrase “absolute clear evidence.” So, an error in logic is another explanation.
 
Or maybe turnout was higher among all demographics? I don’t try to find assertions that support an ideology and call them facts. I go where the facts lead. Truth is what I believe in and truth has no ideology.
Code:
 
Last edited:
Dan123 said:
If there’s no proof of voter fraud, explain this:
Click to expand...
That occurred after the election and is one person.
po18guy said:
Joe Biden is more popular among blacks than Obama?
Click to expand...
Or, another explanation is that the current president was opposed more. The problem with statistical evidence, and why it is no admissible, it only has meaning if one assigns meaning, making it circular logic. For example, how could the current president lose re-election with the second highest votes ever cast for someone? This is only meaningful if one pre-assumes the reason is fraud, not that in this particular election a divided country came out in record numbers, the more logical explanation. In either case, this is not evidence of anything. It is only data that can be interpreted only by making other assumptions.
 
gam197 said:
This only became an issue because of mail in ballots. It furthered the risk for more corruption than was already there.

Corruption had the potential to be full blown. No one knows.
Click to expand...
Well, the president’s head of cybersecurity did assess the potential for corruption and found it to be unfounded. So far, no evidence that this potential was realized has been presented.
 
whatistrue said:
You mean the same mail in ballots that have been used for multiple decades with no significant issues ? Those mail in ballots?
Click to expand...
They have been used but not on this scale where many people voted by mail-in creating a potential problem for corruption.
 
pnewton said:
48.png
gam197:
This only became an issue because of mail in ballots. It furthered the risk for more corruption than was already there.
Corruption had the potential to be full blown. No one knows.
Click to expand...
Well, the president’s head of cybersecurity did assess the potential for corruption and found it to be unfounded. So far, no evidence that this potential was realized has been presented.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
What head of cybersecurity.? There are so many people throwing things out, no one know for sure.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
That would be Chris Krebs that I referred to as being threatened with execution for reporting what he believed to be true. He worked for the Homeland Security as head of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, appointed 2018 under the current administration. He was fired after stating that the claim that votes were switched was a hoax and was nonsense.
 
There are two states that have been using exclusively mail in voting for all elections for at least 10 years and one for over 20. Scaling up was not the dangerous threat that Trump claimed in advance to set up this very situation. He lost, fair and square, and simply won’t accept reality if it doesn’t fit his preconceptions.
Code:
 
Last edited:
whatistrue said:
There are two states that have been using exclusively mail in voting for all elections for at least 10 years and one for over 20. Scaling up was not the dangerous threat that Trump claimed in advance to set up this very situation. He lost, fair and square, and simply won’t accept reality if it doesn’t fit his preconceptions.
Click to expand...
Seventy-four million who voted for Trump do not believe and 30% of Democratic who voted question whether this election is fair.

Yes on a small scale mail-in ballots might have been able to be checked but not on the massive scale.

There was a real problem in this election cycle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top