Man Wearing MAGA Hat Attacked in Maryland Neighborhood

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cathoholic

Guest

Man Wearing MAGA Hat Attacked in Maryland Neighborhood​

Henry Rodgers / @henryrodgersdc / April 16, 2019

A legal citizen from Togo was reportedly attacked in Maryland for wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat on Saturday, as police have taken two suspects into custody.

The man, who lives in Germantown, Maryland, was reportedly attacked in his neighborhood by two men because he was wearing the hat, in support of President Donald Trump. He was reportedly hit in the head and upper body as the two suspects tried to steal his hat from him, according to ABC7.

The Montgomery County Police Department said the victim, “who was wearing a red, Make America Great Again hat, was approached by two men who began harassing the victim and asking why he was wearing the MAGA hat.”

“The victim told the suspects that he was entitled to his own views and kept walking away from the suspects. The suspects began striking the victim and telling him to take the hat off. The victim continued to be struck by the suspects until he fell to the ground. . . .

.

With extreme leftists, you are NOT entitled to your own views and THAT was the mistake this poor man made.

Compounding the issue, the victim is a black man (leftists are particularly hard on minorities that do not tow the “progressive” line. At least the “progressives” in America).

Extreme leftists look at people as beasts unable to think thoughts that differ from themselves without being “inferior”.

(This dehumanizing certain people is seen quite starkly in the leftist abortion support for example.)

Because of this elitist view, “Centralized Planning” is part and parcel to the leftist ideology.
(“We leftists NEED to make more and more of their decisions for them. They are mere beasts and are not enlightened as we are.”)

That is where their Statism bisects their elitist outlook.

Since the State is the highest authority in their world, the ends justify the means.

And FORCE can be used to “help” people to think “correctly”.

There are some seeds of truth that get dramatically distorted by the leftists who think this way, and these constant beatings (I have posted many others) is the natural result.

This will only worsen as the Godlessness continues on a larger scale (and the leftist idea of “State” continues to fill that void of God they have chosen to remove).
 
Last edited:
I think you should turn the stereotyping down. It’s a bit over the top in the OP.
 
1Lord1Faith . . .
I think you should turn the stereotyping down. It’s a bit over the top in the OP.
Thanks for telling me what to do with my post.
 
This is so sad the people are being hurt just for wearing a stupid hat.
 
When it’s cold, I wear a scarf.

It says ‘Forza Napoli’ along it, it’s a soccer supporters’ scarf, I do not live in Naples, I’m not a Naples supporter.

I live in the UK, it annoys some people.

I understand people who wear silly hats.
 
Another perspective of the same story.

.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

YouTube screenshot

NEWSFREEDOM, POLITICS - U.S.Thu Apr 18, 2019 - 2:38 pm EST

Black immigrant punched in head in Maryland for wearing MAGA hat​

Calvin Freiburger
Calvin Freiburger Follow Calvin

Atsu Mable, Donald Trump, Jovan Crawford, Left-Wing Violence, Liberal Intolerance, Maga Hats, Make America Great Again, Maryland, Scott Roberson, Trump Hats, Washington Post

April 18, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – A Maryland accountant who immigrated to the United States was assaulted last weekend by two black men who said his support of President Donald Trump made him a traitor to his race, in an incident whose full details are being downplayed in national mainstream media. . . .
 
With the left it’s always about tolerance but only re their views.
 
(name removed by moderator) . . .
People are often intolerant on the whole, especially of anything considered outside the ‘norm’. Tribalism is both a necessary part of the human psyche but also destructive.
I just don’t recall an epidemic of people getting beaten up for
wearing “Hope and Change” t-shirts back in '07.

I’m sure a couple of those probably occurred. I just don’t recall any off hand.
 
Last edited:
(name removed by moderator) . . .
I should hope none did and nor do I support or have anything but disgust for people been beaten up simply for wearing MAGA hats. Not being fond of Trump’s political rhetoric does not mean I would in any way countenance or wish people who supported him to be attacked.
Well stated (name removed by moderator).
 
Last edited:
How are you not seeing that only one side of this (the GOP) is attempting to follow our rule of law.
 
Last edited:
True enough Jeanne_S.

The beatings against Trump supporters began long ago.

Here is an almost certainly homeless gal back in 2016 (even before Trump won, and who didn’t even dare to wear a MAGA cap) getting beaten and mocked for protecting Trump’s Star (and some people still make excuses and/or offer deflections for this kind of behavior!)

TOLERANT LEFT BEAT UP HOMELESS WOMAN PROTECTING TRUMP’S STAR (in Hollywood)​

I can’t link the video here because the Hillary supporters were so crass, that the video will not be OK for our environment here.

But for those interested, go to YouTube, and search . .

“Hillary supporters attack a homeless black woman”.
 
I just don’t recall an epidemic of people getting beaten up for
wearing “Hope and Change” t-shirts back in '07
Might I suggest using a different word in place of “epidemic.”

Epidemic is from the Latin “epidemia” which had to do with disease. In the interest of the stance you’ve encouraged on not redefining words or invoking usages outside of the prevailing usage the words I would suggest using in place of “epidemic” here include
  • rampant
  • pervasive,
  • permeating
  • common
  • popular
  • typically
The non-disease usage of the word “epidemic” is a more recent usage and part of the semantic shift that the word is experiencing. But in previous discussions on evolving word usage you had expressed a dislike for shifting meanings.

This suggestion does not imply agreement or disagreement with the matter at hand.
 
Last edited:
But for those interested, go to YouTube, and search . .

“Hillary supporters attack a homeless black woman”.

Whoops.

That didn’t work.

Google has a partial shadow-ban on it.

If you put in the exact title, you get four others ahead of it.

Addendum two:

Now when I re-searched it, it changed from number five, to number three about two minutes later.

Now all I am getting is ranked at three (your mileage may vary depending on what Youtube gives you).

Search as I said above, then go down to “TheObamaFile” right under the title.

Addendum three:

Now back to fifth place for me even with the exact title.

Now it is showing up in sixth place.

(I screen captured it otherwise someone may try to say the Youtube games didn’t happen).

The point is, even with the exact title, Youtube will not give you this in first place in your search (for whatever reason. I’m sure there are excuses for this).
 
ThinkingSapien . . .
Might I suggest using a different word in place of “epidemic.”
No.

Sorry but you do not get to tell me how to craft my posts.
 
Last edited:
Sorry but you do not get to tell me how to craft my posts.
Technically, we can tell anyone almost anything. Ofcourse we all also have free will and can usually take or leave a suggestion as we please case by case. You’ve chosen not to accept the suggestion and we are both okay with that.

In either case I’m personally in favor of accepting semantic drift (contrary to my offer of assistance on avoiding an embrace of it). I do find interest in the olde English too. Just this week I was learning more about the letters þ and Ƿ and the spelling rules for using the letter ſ (that last one is the long-s and not the letter f). It’s fascinating stuff. 🙂
 
For everybody else that wants to get back on the topic of the thread, once again go to YouTube.

Search . . .

"Hillary supporters attack a homeless black woman".

And look carefully for the exact title.

It will likely show up between the 3rd and 6th result (but may be outside of that too).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top