I deleted and then reposted the article about the Catholic sisters as examples of attendees who as Gracepoole explained earlier, were there to focus on other issues. In this case Catholic religious.
Who was there to focus on Catholic religious?
PP is a target because beyond the many healthcare services they provide, they also perform abortions and regardless of the small percentage that abortion may be of what they do, and regardless that they are forbidden to use federal funding for abortion, groups still target them.
Alexandra Desanctis, National Review:
nationalreview.com/article/444032/planned-parenthood-defunding-abortion-cecile-richards-trevor-noah-daily-show
“We’re really proud at Planned Parenthood to provide women all their reproductive health care, and we always will,” Richards said. And later, “This is an issue of access to health care, of a wide swath of health care. And for many folks, we’re their only health care. Paul Ryan is saying, ‘We’re going to end that.’”
This is Planned Parenthood’s most common rhetorical strategy, and it’s easy to see why it’s so effective. In reality, though, Planned Parenthood’s claim to provide numerous types of essential health care is highly misleading, and much of the care women receive at its clinics could easily be obtained elsewhere. For one thing, the group’s infamous assertion that abortion is a mere 3 percent of the services it provides has been debunked by left-leaning outlets such as Slate and the Washington Post, and the deception underlying that statistic was explained in depth by Rich Lowry in Politico in 2015.
An accurate assessment of the group’s abortion numbers reveals that one in eight women who visits a Planned Parenthood clinic obtains an abortion. To obscure that fact, Planned Parenthood consistently overstates its other, supposedly crucial services, falsely claiming to provide mammograms and exaggerating its commitment to prenatal care. In fact, the group provides less than 1 percent of the nation’s pap tests and less than 2 percent of its breast exams and cancer screenings, while at the same time providing over 30 percent of its abortions.
Although thousands of federally qualified health-care centers (FQHCs) across the country are able to provide women with numerous necessary services — many of them more essential than those offered by Planned Parenthood — Richards maintained that FQHCs can’t handle the volume of patients currently served by Planned Parenthood and that women therefore will still lose health-care access if the organization is defunded. This is difficult to believe, given the 13,540 FQHCs and rural health-care clinics across the country, whereas Planned Parenthood operates a mere 665 facilities. (See this excellent map to understand how drastically community clinics outnumber Planned Parenthoods, by a ratio of 20 to one.)
Planned Parenthood executives contend that low-income women in rural areas in particular will be harmed if the abortion group is defunded. But take, for example, the rural state of Nebraska, which has a total of two Planned Parenthood clinics and 167 FQHCs. How could it be possible that two Planned Parenthood clinics serve so many women that 167 healthcare centers would be overwhelmed by an overflow of patients? Meanwhile, even in California, the state with the most Planned Parenthood clinics by far, the abortion group has a mere 114 centers compared with 1,694 community health clinics.
If anyone is making a political game out of women’s care, it is Planned Parenthood, which demands that the government subsidize health care that the group has bundled together with abortion.
In addition, Richards asserted that the Republican party doesn’t care about women and that in trying to remove government funding from Planned Parenthood Republicans are playing partisan politics with women’s health care. But if anyone is making a political game out of women’s care, it is Planned Parenthood and its Democratic allies, who demand that the government subsidize health care that the group has bundled together with highly controversial — not to mention immoral — abortion procedures.
If Planned Parenthood stopped performing abortions, few in either party would object to funding the organization; Republicans at every level support reimbursing FQHCs to provide necessary care that does not include abortions. If the group sees itself as invaluable to American women, it should cease providing abortions and focus all of its resources on truly essential health care. But it will never do that, because it is first and foremost an abortion corporation. That is where the bulk of its profit comes from.
Finally, Richards repeatedly claimed that the American people love Planned Parenthood and don’t want it to be defunded, bragging about the outpouring of support the group has seen since the election. Perhaps she missed the latest poll on the defunding effort, which shows that voters in 2018 Senate battleground states — Florida, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, and Wisconsin — support ending federal funding for Planned Parenthood, 56 to 40 percent; 28 percent strongly support federal funding for Planned Parenthood, while 47 percent strongly oppose it. Even more interesting, the poll found that, by a margin of over 30 percentage points, Americans in these battleground states would be less likely to vote for any senator who voted to give federal money to Planned Parenthood rather than to local community health centers; 44 percent considered themselves “much less likely” to do so.
)