H
Hesychios
Guest

I am certain the church will always be Catholic!I really Hope the Church stays catholic, and does not allow priests to marry in the latin/Roman rite.
I am certain the church will always be Catholic!I really Hope the Church stays catholic, and does not allow priests to marry in the latin/Roman rite.
I’m not even sure how many of these numbers are properly calculated. In the US and many other countries, the Census does not ask for religious affiliation. So the numbers come from the Church and there’s no clear cut definition used in the self-reporting by the faith groups. Most of the US numbers seem to come from an ongoing tally of members starting from a certain day + Baptisms - Deaths. Obviously that’s not a very accurate stat.A general rule of thumb is that if a country is considered to be traditionally Catholic, its number of orthodox practicing Catholics is dramatically smaller than its on paper total of those who are willing to mark the Catholic box on the census.
Hello asquared!You won’t see married priests until Catholics start to tithe. If we refuse to pay a living wage to our Catholic school teachers (whose children are in public school because they can’t afford the tuition where they teach), we won’t be able to pay a priest enought to support a family, let alone send his kids to Catholic schools. We have married men in holy orders, the deacons, who just came back from their national conference. Most of them are retired and relying on pensions or SS, or their wives are still working, or they have side jobs if they are in parish work. Very few have actual church “jobs” with decent salaries. A protestant congregation of perhaps 300-400 families can pay the preacher enough to live in the same lifestyle as the congregation, plus pay a youth pastor, children’s pastor, administrative staff and so forth, but a Catholic parish of 2000 families can barely make expenses, let alone pay a man with a growing (non-contracepting) family enough to live on.
It’s actually quite the opposite. Having been a parish council member in a parish with a married priest, I can tell you with great confidence that he had no problem living on the wage we paid him. Why? Break it down:You won’t see married priests until Catholics start to tithe. If we refuse to pay a living wage to our Catholic school teachers (whose children are in public school because they can’t afford the tuition where they teach), we won’t be able to pay a priest enought to support a family, let alone send his kids to Catholic schools. We have married men in holy orders, the deacons, who just came back from their national conference. Most of them are retired and relying on pensions or SS, or their wives are still working, or they have side jobs if they are in parish work. Very few have actual church “jobs” with decent salaries. A protestant congregation of perhaps 300-400 families can pay the preacher enough to live in the same lifestyle as the congregation, plus pay a youth pastor, children’s pastor, administrative staff and so forth, but a Catholic parish of 2000 families can barely make expenses, let alone pay a man with a growing (non-contracepting) family enough to live on.
Michael,I shamelessly copied this information from a website here and I am not sure how old the facts are
Check this out:Could you be just a tad more specific? I’d really like to know. Thanks.
That actually is pretty common. My father is a physician and he took care of all the sisters in the convent plus the parish priests at no charge to them. He took whatever diocesan insurance paid. One of the scout masters in the parish was a dentist, and I know he did the same for them on dental care.On my planet, doctors and other professionals don’t give anything away free, and diocesan health care for a family is over 400 a month, with 20 copay and 25 per prescription, 1000 family deductible, that sure adds up fast for a family with kids.
Thanks. The material collected there seems quite dubious. The most damning of canons it lists (“27 D”) allows that readers and cantors are free to marry (but implied in the commentaries I can find: they also forego further clerical advancement). Indeed, I believe up until the supression of the minor orders, those clerks who had attained them were still free to pursue marriage.
Sorry, I must have mis-read. I thought that the question was about allowing married men to be ordained not about allowing ordained men to marry.Thanks. The material collected there seems quite dubious. The most damning of canons it lists (“27 D”) allows that readers and cantors are free to marry (but implied in the commentaries I can find: they also forego further clerical advancement). Indeed, I believe up until the supression of the minor orders, those clerks who had attained them were still free to pursue marriage.
Not very convincing for the case of allowing ordained me to marry.
tee
I have to agree with that. Deacons are married and are ordained…so why not ?It might happen after the death (God-Forbid) of Pope JPII. There is a dire need for priests. Other demonations have married clergy, why can’t Catholicism? It is already happening to a point. The church is accepting former Lutheran and Episcopal pastors as priests and they are allowing them to stay married.
Blondeone
BINGO!As St. Paul tells us those who are married will be concerned with the things of this world, i.e., their spouse, etc., while those who do not marry are free to be concerned with God. It would be both a disservice to the Church and to the priest’s family if he were to marry.
Re-read the question attached to the survey.I have to agree with that. Deacons are married and are ordained…so why not ?