Marrying in to a Catholic family with an openly gay member

  • Thread starter Thread starter a1001nav
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow, its hard enough to find the “perfect” Godly spouse, but now you are looking for the perfectly Godly family, as well? Well… all I can say is good luck with that.
 
Hello,
I am a 28 year old Catholic man who has fallen in love and plan to marry the woman of my dreams. She comes from a loving family who identify as Catholic, but her brother no longer attends mass and has been openly gay now for at least 4 years. Because of this, I see a conflict on the horizon when it comes to raising children near her family.
I recently had a conversation with my fiancée about raising our children as strong Catholics, when the subject of her brother came up. She described him as irresponsible right now, but hopes he finally settles down and either “converts” or perhaps commits to “one partner.” She then said that she would be comfortable with him in our children’s lives if either of these scenarios came true.
I disagreed, saying that I am not comfortable with her brother ever bringing his gay partner around while the children are young, out of fear for their innocence and impressionability.
I told her that I always want her brother in our lives, and that I love and respect him, but that I can’t be ok with him bringing that behavior or lifestyle into our household because I feel that would be endorsing it or making it appear normal in the presence of my children.
She was obviously greatly troubled at this, explaining that she knows such a mandate would alienate her brother and breed contempt.
I need help and advice! Am I representing Christ here, or am I being stubborn? This is a complicated issue on many fronts. So I’m asking for help and advice from others who may have similar situations. I would also appreciate any priestly advice on how I should approach this situation in preparing for our marriage, and during our marriage. What can I tell her brother if the time comes that he wants to bring his gay partner over to spend time with my children? How do I explain to her that I love her family, while not accepting her brother’s behavior?

Seeking the truth

-A
I was in this exact same situation, so I will relay what we have done to date. When I was newly engaged, I learned that my husband’s youngest brother was openly homosexual and was really pushing the homosexual agenda. I would not allow his brother to invite his partner, as I was getting married on a conservative Catholic campus by my very conservative uncle and history professor (two priests). That decision did not go over great, but I held my ground. At that time, my husband did not learn what scandal was. When he did, he fully supported my decision.

When my son was very young (before he could talk and have impressionable memories), we brought him to family events with said BIL and partner. However, when he became more impressionable, we decided to stop him from joining events where two were present. This is still the case (he is 10), as we want to make sure he is firm in the Catechism concerning SSA.

Most people would think that families who go to church and openly accept said family as “good Catholics.” In our case, my in-laws joined a pretty radical group looking to undermine the teachings of the CC. The were very involved in their church as extraordinary ministers and lectors. However, they gave the impression that Catholics were tolerant of “near occasion of sin” by SSA couples.

I can understand your concern, as when we went to a more liberal CC, we became squishy on our Catechism. Seeing families in attendance with an openly SSA couple (and the natural assumption is that the are NOT being chaste), it leads Catholics to think the church accepts this behavior. Add a priest that does not preach often or at all, and you have these families creating scandal.

I know this response will not be popular. Thankfully, as my husband learned more about the Cathechism, he totally came on board with me. However, when we got or get pushback from Catholic family members, we say, “We have 1 shot to get to Heaven, and we do not think 2000 years of inspired wisdom can be wrong.”

Good luck and God bless.
 
.
How are you defining “militant” and “physical affection”?

I trust you are not suggesting that showing normal affection or sharing a kiss is “in your face” and “loud” and “militant”.
A couple who cares about each other and shows a bit of warm affection in public would be considered natural, relaxed and normal.

If the two guys were french kissing in leather thongs at the Thanksgiving dinner table, that would be a tad in-your-face (and a stereotypical cliche, to boot)
But hugs and a quick kiss on cheek or lips, as any couple would do in public, would be the average amount of affection a couple would normally show.

I have to say that I agree with RJ here. In our case, we could not guarantee that said family member and other in-laws would respect the boundaries we set. In our case, it would be BIL’s use of the term spouse and MIL’s saying they are married. In my son asked a question out of earshot, I couldn’t guarantee he would get our “preferred answer.” Just my thoughts.

.
 
.
How are you defining “militant” and “physical affection”?

I trust you are not suggesting that showing normal affection or sharing a kiss is “in your face” and “loud” and “militant”.
A couple who cares about each other and shows a bit of warm affection in public would be considered natural, relaxed and normal.

If the two guys were french kissing in leather thongs at the Thanksgiving dinner table, that would be a tad in-your-face (and a stereotypical cliche, to boot)
But hugs and a quick kiss on cheek or lips, as any couple would do in public, would be the average amount of affection a couple would normally show.

.
She already set up the false dichotomy of in the closet or in your face. There is a happy medium, and most gay people are in it.
 
She was obviously greatly troubled at this, explaining that she knows such a mandate would alienate her brother and breed contempt.
Mandate :confused:

While you’re having a long and genuine soul search about this issue, and your future together, I hope she is too.

I would never tolerate anyone, for any reason, mandating to me which members of my family and their partners and friends are welcome in my home.

Sarah x 🙂
 
Hello,
I am a 28 year old Catholic man who has fallen in love and plan to marry the woman of my dreams. She comes from a loving family who identify as Catholic, but her brother no longer attends mass and has been openly gay now for at least 4 years. Because of this, I see a conflict on the horizon when it comes to raising children near her family.
I recently had a conversation with my fiancée about raising our children as strong Catholics, when the subject of her brother came up. She described him as irresponsible right now, but hopes he finally settles down and either “converts” or perhaps commits to “one partner.” She then said that she would be comfortable with him in our children’s lives if either of these scenarios came true.
I disagreed, saying that I am not comfortable with her brother ever bringing his gay partner around while the children are young, out of fear for their innocence and impressionability.
I told her that I always want her brother in our lives, and that I love and respect him, but that I can’t be ok with him bringing that behavior or lifestyle into our household because I feel that would be endorsing it or making it appear normal in the presence of my children.
She was obviously greatly troubled at this, explaining that she knows such a mandate would alienate her brother and breed contempt.
I need help and advice! Am I representing Christ here, or am I being stubborn? This is a complicated issue on many fronts. So I’m asking for help and advice from others who may have similar situations. I would also appreciate any priestly advice on how I should approach this situation in preparing for our marriage, and during our marriage. What can I tell her brother if the time comes that he wants to bring his gay partner over to spend time with my children? How do I explain to her that I love her family, while not accepting her brother’s behavior?

Seeking the truth

-A
I think you’re in the right here, or at least not obviously wrong. The spiritual well-being of your children should be privileged over any hurt feelings of your possible future brother-in-law, and homosexual behavior is a scandal of a very high order, especially in the context of a society that encourages and celebrates such behavior.

I grew up with two lesbian sisters and surrounded by my mother’s many lesbian friends and I can testify personally to the damage this is capable of doing to a young child’s sensibilities. Nothing short of a massive whallop of grace turned my life around from the disorder my parents inculcated in me by the bad example they set. I wouldn’t roll the dice on that happening again just to keep from hurting BIL’s feelings.

And before anyone asks, no, my sisters are not getting anywhere near my future children.
Although you have the ultimate responsibility (with your wife) of raising your child as you seen fit, would your reaction about exposing your children to certain behaviors be different if the BIL was straight and living with a girl without benefit of marriage? Is it the behavior or the person?**

Seeing a man and woman kiss isn’t necessarily an occasion of scandal.
The Bucket;10271155:
And a lot of this is all about the public perception. What if the family member was in the closet? What if he was married but ran around with other women behind his wife’s back and no one knew it? The same sin is present, only less visible. The damage to the Mystical Body of Christ is just as bad if the sin is unknown to others as it is if it is known.
Right, because the issue is the scandal given to one’s children.
You need to remember that Jesus sought out sinners and went to their homes for dinner. He didn’t ban them from His presence or His family/friends’ presence. He treated them with the utmost love, respect and dignity. Jesus would let them know their sins were wrong but that He loved them and accepted them anyway.
Jesus never would have converted anyone if he had refused to be seen in public, and be in private, with people that were sinners.

The “culture wars” are pretty easy to take sides on until you have to deal with them in your own family. It’s much harder on a personal basis.

When I was hungry, you gave me to eat. When I was naked, you clothed me. When I was in prison, you visited me. When I was gay and just wanted to be loved you ostracized me and kept me from my family.

Hmm. That doesn’t seem to fit, does it?
Do either of you two take your toddlers to gay strip clubs, since evidently they’re just tools for evangelism in your mind? Come on, guys.

This man’s children won’t be the eternally sinless son of the living God, they’ll be human children who need to have their sensibilities properly formed at a crucial time in their life. That means not exposing them to smut and perversion.
 
She already set up the false dichotomy of in the closet or in your face. There is a happy medium, and most gay people are in it.
I was wrong 😦

When I opened this thread I guessed it would be 5 posts before someone equated the brothers homosexuality with pedophilia and the threat posed to any children in their immediate environment.

It took to #8 to get there :rolleyes:

Sarah x 🙂
 
:bigyikes::bigyikes::bigyikes:

I hope you don’t mind if the next time my hubby complains about how many family members I have, I bring up YOUR family!! Wow! How many siblings in your mother’s and father’s families? I had 7 on one side, 9 on the other. But not all of those went on to have a passel of kids.
Daddy was the 10th of 12, mom was the youngest of 14. I’m the 5th of six kids. My husband is the oldest of two kids, but his dad was the 2nd of 18, my mother in law is the oldest of 8. We have 7, #8 coming any day now!!! Our families are nothing if we aren’t fertile I guess!:rolleyes:
Like I said, I’m the 5th of six and so far there are 29 grandkids, 3 great grand kids for my parents (30 counting our new one). My mom used to joke about needing a parade permit to walk across the street. During lent we would go to Long John Silvers on Fridays–EVERYONE in the place would murmur about how we must be Catholic. It’s more fun than hard, but definetly not what most people are used to. I can’t imagine living in any other family though.
 
Do either of you two take your toddlers to gay strip clubs, since evidently they’re just tools for evangelism in your mind? Come on, guys.

This man’s children won’t be the eternally sinless son of the living God, they’ll be human children who need to have their sensibilities properly formed at a crucial time in their life. That means not exposing them to smut and perversion.
Of course not. That’s ridiculous and you know it. But I’m not going to keep them away from family either. It’s not like any of the people in either of our families would pole dance or grope each other in front of anybody’s kids. Not the gay members, straight members, saints…no matter what type of sinner they are, we do have a sense of modesty. I personally can’t stand heterosexual couples making out or dressing/acting immodestly any more than I would a gay couple.
 
This does seem to be a very sensitive subject; however, your first inclination was right.

We must always remember that we have a duty to our primary families, i.e., our spouses and children, before our obligations to our extended members. In this situation, I think many people are focusing too much on the feelings of the gay in-law. However, as a responsible parent, you have the duty to protect your children (future children) from the possible harm of seeing a disordered union being carried out so close to the home by a close family member. Even if you tell your children it is wrong, the fact that the environment was present in their formative years will have a serious impact on their view of homosexual relationships in the future.

Think about the matter logically; you either tell your children that your brother in law and his possible partners are living in an impure manner at a very young age, running the risk of exposing them to “too much too soon.” On the other hand, if you wait until they are older to explain the matter, they might become too attached to the idea that their “uncles” are happy (or at least were when the children were young), and might reject your ideas for the more popular secular perspectives (and believe me; in this country, homosexuality is a lethally popular fad among youths).

On the other hand, you could leave the man out of the children’s lives for a decade or so. My extended family also engaged in behavior contrary to Church teaching, so my parents did the responsible thing and prevented our interaction in the same way (and I bless them every day for their courage).

Ultimately, you should talk the issue over with your fiancee. She will have to choose between you and her brother. If she is a remarkable woman (which I hope she is), she would be equally concerned about her children’s mental and moral health and will agree to avoid contact with her brother. If she cares more about her relative’s feelings than her children’s safety, then I would call off the marriage.
 
Wow, its hard enough to find the “perfect” Godly spouse, but now you are looking for the perfectly Godly family, as well? Well… all I can say is good luck with that.
[x]Most sensible post in the thread.
 
In my opinion there is entirely too much emphasis in this thread placed on the openly-gay-future-brother-in-law’s feelings, not because his feelings are trivial or to be dismissed, but because the original question was a parenting question.

The gay couple does not have to kiss and make out in front of people in order to scandalize a child, all they need mention is their “husband” and that can open up the door to confusion. A parent has a moral obligation to raise their children as they prayerfully see fit. If this future couple discerns that the brother-in-law is very modest and discreet then they may decide to have a close relationship with him. However if in the future it seems that the brother-in-law is not only affectionate but speaks openly about his “husband” or other matters in front of young children, then the original poster is entirely within his rights and obligation as a parent to discern whether or not to have this person in close contact with his children.

I speak from some (although not exactly the same) experience. Someone was a distant relative and informed us they were transgender. We sought spiritual direction for how to handle it. We were told that yes, we were supposed to be kind, we were supposed to be loving and we should invite this person out for coffee or lunch with my husband and I and do all we could to show love for them as they were a beloved child of God! However we were cautioned to consider keeping the relationship as adults only until we could decide what to expose our children to and decide what they were ready for.

Look at it this way, yes of course our children are all going to learn about ALL things of this world eventually! Homosexuality, people who are trans-gender, what sexual intercourse is…but as parents we need to discern what they are ready for and when. My children did not know what abortion was until they were a little older because they could not have handled it emotionally. My children learned about sexual intercourse when I thought they were ready, and they learned about homosexuality after that.

I don’t think the comparison of other “sins” is a good guide to use when discerning who to have your children around because it’s not the sin itself it’s whether or not the sin is obvious and overt and will scandalize the child. It is generally not obvious to children that someone does not attend Mass, however if a family member were openly talking about how “silly Mass and the Catholic church are” I would keep my children at a distance. It is generally not obvious to children that they are around people who are co-habiting but if the couple is open and vocal about sharing a bedroom I would keep my chidlren at a distance. If it were an openly homosexual couple I would keep my children at a distance until they reached a level of maturity where I thought they would not be scandalized. I think I am in the minority here but just wanted to share my thoughts. God bless you.
I think this advice is spot on and was the path we chose. However, it is very tough when decisions are driven by feelings versus truth. Elizabeth Scalia has a lot to say about sentimentalism, which are decisions based solely on feelings. God bless.
 
Since this is an impediment for you, you should make an appointment for yourself and future spouse to talk to a priest- sort of a pre- pre-cana.
This problem is not going go away, you need professional guidance, not opinions.
 
My brother married a woman who has an openly gay brother. They simply told their children that same-sex relationships are not normal, that their gay uncle, because of his sinful nature has abnormal inclinations toward the same sex. He asked his children to pray for their uncle, that God might free him from these inclinations.

Their exposure to their uncle has taught them how to see past a person’s flaws to the beauty of the person. It has taught them not to base a person’s value on what sins they commit. It has taught them not to be condemnatory but to help through their prayers. The children love their uncle and have no desire to be gay.
 
In my opinion there is entirely too much emphasis in this thread placed on the openly-gay-future-brother-in-law’s feelings, not because his feelings are trivial or to be dismissed, but because the original question was a parenting question.

The gay couple does not have to kiss and make out in front of people in order to scandalize a child, all they need mention is their “husband” and that can open up the door to confusion. A parent has a moral obligation to raise their children as they prayerfully see fit. If this future couple discerns that the brother-in-law is very modest and discreet then they may decide to have a close relationship with him. However if in the future it seems that the brother-in-law is not only affectionate but speaks openly about his “husband” or other matters in front of young children, then the original poster is entirely within his rights and obligation as a parent to discern whether or not to have this person in close contact with his children.

I speak from some (although not exactly the same) experience. Someone was a distant relative and informed us they were transgender. We sought spiritual direction for how to handle it. We were told that yes, we were supposed to be kind, we were supposed to be loving and we should invite this person out for coffee or lunch with my husband and I and do all we could to show love for them as they were a beloved child of God! However we were cautioned to consider keeping the relationship as adults only until we could decide what to expose our children to and decide what they were ready for.

Look at it this way, yes of course our children are all going to learn about ALL things of this world eventually! Homosexuality, people who are trans-gender, what sexual intercourse is…but as parents we need to discern what they are ready for and when. My children did not know what abortion was until they were a little older because they could not have handled it emotionally. My children learned about sexual intercourse when I thought they were ready, and they learned about homosexuality after that.

I don’t think the comparison of other “sins” is a good guide to use when discerning who to have your children around because it’s not the sin itself it’s whether or not the sin is obvious and overt and will scandalize the child. It is generally not obvious to children that someone does not attend Mass, however if a family member were openly talking about how “silly Mass and the Catholic church are” I would keep my children at a distance. It is generally not obvious to children that they are around people who are co-habiting but if the couple is open and vocal about sharing a bedroom I would keep my chidlren at a distance. If it were an openly homosexual couple I would keep my children at a distance until they reached a level of maturity where I thought they would not be scandalized. I think I am in the minority here but just wanted to share my thoughts. Gdo bless you.
:clapping:

:yup:

Yes. It’s a parenting question. They don’t yet have children, but knowing what I know now about parenting and marriage, this is** not** just about the future brother-in-law. Good parenting is hard work–and it means making unpopular decisions at times. Although moms and dads parent differently from each other, mom and dad should approach parenting as a team effort. Therefore, it’s also about the relationship between the couple—future husband and wife.

Spouses need to respect and consider each other’s opinions. How does his fiance respond to her future husband’s concerns? Can they talk about this like reasonable people? Does she put her brother and his feelings put* above* her fiance’s concerns about exposing their future children to a militant homosexual/anti-Catholic agenda? Does she put her fears of hurting her brother’s feelings over any concerns about her future children?

To my mind, the op has several good reason for being concerned. And, as another poster mentioned, the op has a serious question that might be better off bringing to a priest who knows the people involved rather than just asking strangers on the internet. If he is going through a good marriage prep program (some are great; some aren’t so good) I would suggest that it is a topic worthy of further discussion.
 
It’s a tough situation. I have a niece who is gay, but she never mentions it, does not bring anyone to family gatherings, and it has never been an issue that needed to be discussed yet with the children in the family. Her discretion is so appreciated.

I love her dearly. If it ever came to a time where she was very open and bringing an inappropriate relationship into the family gatherings, I would explain to children that though we love her, the actions are against God’s will, and that is never ok…that we should pray for her every day and be respectful. If it was blatant “in your face” kind of behavior going on, I would talk to her privately and ask her to stop. If it didn’t, I would not be around, as sad as that would make me.
 
:(:o

My uncle is gay.

I never knew about it until I was in my 20’s perhaps.

When I was a child, he was a bachelor uncle with a “room-mate.” I think perhaps I met the room-mate at some point as a child…I don’t remember. My uncle lived out of state.

He came to visit perhaps bi-monthly and stay for the weekend, “Room-mate” did not come along. I clearly remember meeting the room-mate at about 16. I never put two and two together.

Uncle would go to family functions sometimes with a lady friend, sometimes with with “Room-mate” I thought it was nice that we were friends with my uncle’s room-mate.

I stayed at their home for a few days a a time in my 20’s. It was a nice home, nothing blatantly flamboyant (for lack of a better word ) still never put two and two together.

Now my children have met my uncle and room mate (various times. now we live further apart) They think he’s a friend of my uncle’s. I haven’t ever had to explain or answer questions. Nothing has ever come up.

My DH’s family is totally unaware, my friends are unaware. My uncle is not in the closet, he just is circumspect.

I’m glad I got to know him, he’s a senior citizen now. He’s been generous and kind to us.

I do believe what the Church teaches re the topic. I love him and hope that he’s in a state of grace.

On the other hand, I’ve had to explain to my kids already, divorce and remarriage, couples living together without being married, and children born out of wedlock. But so far no questions about my uncle.
 
If I were in your shoes, I wouldn’t allow the man in my house
with a “partner” of his, ever. I also would not associate with him
except at the few absolutely necessary times. Obviously, choose
someone else to be Godfather if your wife has a child.
 
:(:o

My uncle is gay.

I never knew about it until I was in my 20’s perhaps.

When I was a child, he was a bachelor uncle with a “room-mate.” I think perhaps I met the room-mate at some point as a child…I don’t remember. My uncle lived out of state.

He came to visit perhaps bi-monthly and stay for the weekend, “Room-mate” did not come along. I clearly remember meeting the room-mate at about 16. I never put two and two together.

Uncle would go to family functions sometimes with a lady friend, sometimes with with “Room-mate” I thought it was nice that we were friends with my uncle’s room-mate.

I stayed at their home for a few days a a time in my 20’s. It was a nice home, nothing blatantly flamboyant (for lack of a better word ) still never put two and two together.

Now my children have met my uncle and room mate (various times. now we live further apart) They think he’s a friend of my uncle’s. I haven’t ever had to explain or answer questions. Nothing has ever come up.

My DH’s family is totally unaware, my friends are unaware. My uncle is not in the closet, he just is circumspect.

I’m glad I got to know him, he’s a senior citizen now. He’s been generous and kind to us.

I do believe what the Church teaches re the topic. I love him and hope that he’s in a state of grace.

On the other hand, I’ve had to explain to my kids already, divorce and remarriage, couples living together without being married, and children born out of wedlock. But so far no questions about my uncle.
A past co-worker would mention her sister’s “room mate” and it took me forever to figure it out and I was an adult. One time the co-worker mentioned what her husband gave to the the roommate for Christmas and I thought that’s quite a personal thing to give your sister-in-law’s room mate…ooooohhhhhhh.:doh2: 😊

If it worked on me it would probably work on kids. Yes, I did wonder why her sister had a room mate still but hey, I wasn’t going to judge.
 
I think the bottom line is that people are people and we should all be treated with dignity and respect regardless of our sins. Some sins are public and some are private. All are damaging but every single one of us is also guilty so let’s leave the judging to the Judge and instead focus on the love.

We can love without condoning evil action; the idea that with love must come acceptance of every single thing someone does is a very popular fallacy. We must accept the fact that everyone is worthy of dignity, respect and love because our Lord loves every single person equally. He may be hurt by our actions and our actions may even cut us off entirely from Him, but His love remains all the same. So must we love.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top