Mary's Perpetual Virginity, What's the Big Deal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roscoe_Turner
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
By that logic anyone that touched Jesus or Mary would have dropped dead which we know wasn’t the case.
The Old Covenant is the foreshadow to the New. The New Covenant is different, but God gave us the Old so that we could properly understand the New. The Ark of the Old Covenant was given so that we could properly understand the Ark of the New Covenant, and understand properly the holiness that is found inside.
 
It what the arc contained that gave it power. Not the box itself.
Not so. If that were true, God would not have prohibited anyone except the priests touching it. There is a great danger in “spiritualizing” away the connection between soul and body. We are not just souls, but bodies, bodies that will be resurrected, bodies that, in the persons of Jesus and Mary, have been taken into heaven, glorified for all eternity, as ours will be. Mary’s person was inviolate to all men. She did not and could not, without breaking her vow to God, have had sexual relations with a man. That is what it means.
 
*Hebrews 9:1 Now [even] the first covenant had regulations for worship and an earthly sanctuary. 2 For a tabernacle was constructed, the outer one, in which were the lampstand, the table, and the bread of offering; this is called the Holy Place. 3 Behind the second veil was the tabernacle called the Holy of Holies, 4 in which were the gold altar of incense and the ark of the covenant entirely covered with gold. In it were the gold jar containing the manna, the staff of Aaron that had sprouted, and the tablets of the covenant. 5 Above it were the cherubim of glory overshadowing the place of expiation. Now is not the time to speak of these in detail. 6 With these arrangements for worship, the priests, in performing their service, go into the outer tabernacle repeatedly, 7 but the high priest alone goes into the inner one once a year, not without blood that he offers for himself and for the sins of the people. 8 In this way the holy Spirit shows that the way into the sanctuary had not yet been revealed while the outer tabernacle still had its place. 9 This is a symbol of the present time, in which gifts and sacrifices are offered that cannot perfect the worshiper in conscience 10 but only in matters of food and drink and various ritual washings: regulations concerning the flesh, imposed until the time of the new order.

11 But **when Christ came as high priest *of the good things that have come to be, passing through the greater and more perfect tabernacle not made by hands, that is, not belonging to this creation, 12 he entered once for all into the sanctuary, not with the blood of goats and calves but with his own blood, thus obtaining eternal redemption. 13 For if the blood of goats and bulls and the sprinkling of a heifer’s ashes can sanctify those who are defiled so that their flesh is cleansed, 14 how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from dead works to worship the living God.

Look closely. Jesus, the High Priest, passes through the greater and more perfect tabernacle. Look also at what the Ark contained: 1-manna, 2-Aaron’s priestly staff, 3-tablets of the 10 commandments. Look to Christ, who is the 1-Heavenly Manna, 2-High Priest, 3-Word of God. He is the perfect fulfillment of the shadows of these items. And they were contained in the Ark, just as Jesus was contained in the womb of Mary, passing through the greater and more perfect tabernacle.
 
It what the arc contained that gave it power. Not the box itself.
We don’t claim that Mary has power of her own. She is special for one reason (among many) because she held GOD HIMSELF inside her. REALLY think this over a few times. She held GOD HIMSELF in her womb. God took her nature to become man. Really think this over some.

Think of the times where people came close to the presence of God, and what happened to them. Here are a few:
  1. Moses had to be shielded from the full presence of God, and his face shone when he spent time with God. It shone so much that it scared the people, so he had to wear a veil.
  2. Uzzah was killed for touching the Ark.
  3. The High Priest had to go through VERY specific rituals and cleansing so that he could enter once a year to the Holy of Holies.
  4. The woman who bled for 12 years touched Jesus’ GARMENT and was healed.
  5. Jesus healed many just by touching them
  6. Jesus healed a blind man with His spit and some mud.
  7. John the Baptist leaped for joy (just like David before the Ark) in Elizabeth’s womb at the voice of Mary and the presence of Jesus.
 
Not so. If that were true, God would not have prohibited anyone except the priests touching it. There is a great danger in “spiritualizing” away the connection between soul and body. We are not just souls, but bodies, bodies that will be resurrected, bodies that, in the persons of Jesus and Mary, have been taken into heaven, glorified for all eternity, as ours will be. Mary’s person was inviolate to all men. She did not and could not, without breaking her vow to God, have had sexual relations with a man. That is what it means.
I wholeheartedly agree with your conclusion . However, Mary wasn’t just ‘body’, just as Christ isn’t ‘just body’. She is a person, a rational being comprised of body and soul who gave birth to the Second Person of the Trinity. The soul animates the body through the intellect. A ‘human person’ is a being with a human nature and other individuating human traits. In Mary’s case a very distinct being, the spouse of God.

Violating the person of Mary would violate God’s spouse, and mother.

JoeT
 
I wholeheartedly agree with your conclusion . However, Mary wasn’t just ‘body’, just as Christ isn’t ‘just body’. She is a person, a rational being comprised of body and soul who gave birth to the Second Person of the Trinity. The soul animates the body through the intellect. A ‘human person’ is a being with a human nature and other individuating human traits. In Mary’s case a very distinct being, the spouse of God.

Violating the person of Mary would violate God’s spouse, and mother.

JoeT
Not to be pedantic, but I didn’t state that Mary is just “body”. I was emphasizing the fact that we are not just souls and not just bodies, but souls and bodies–that both are equally important, as demonstrated by the fact that both Jesus and Mary’s bodies were taken to heaven. Naturally, their souls are a part of their bodies. 🙂 Too many people have the heretical idea that our bodies don’t matter–that they are simply vessels for the soul–an idea that came about during the reformation and has poisoned portions of Christianity ever since. The poster denied that the Ark itself was a holy object, but only its contents. This is patently not true, just as it would not be true to say that only Mary or Jesus’ souls were holy and not the whole of their persons, bodies and souls. Does that make sense?
 
By that logic anyone that touched Jesus or Mary would have dropped dead which we know wasn’t the case.
Under Jewish law, nobody was allowed to touch a woman other than his wife. Touching a woman other than one you were legally allowed to be intimate with was forbidden. Even today, observant Orthodox Jews avoid all contact with women other than their wife. They will not shake hands, will not make casual contact when paying for something at the store, etc.

Addressing your question of contact with a woman, the Torah in its Written Law writes (Leviticus 18:6) “No person shall approach a prohibited woman and act immodestly”. Our Oral Tradition explains this prohibition as a unique Torah law that draws a line, not at the act of intimate relations itself, but also at the engaging in any form of intimate contact with a woman one is not permitted to have relations with.
Read More….


Certainly, the Ark of the Covenant teaches us that anyone that tried to touch Mary sexually would have not only violated the Jewish law about touching a woman but would have been killed by God instantly for touching the woman he created and reserved exclusively for himself.

God did create Mary and reserved her exclusively for himself. Like Mary, the Ark was not to be touched by anyone. The Ark rested in the Holy of Holies where God’s Spirit dwelt in the glory cloud.

The Third Person of the Trinity was to be the only person to conceive a child with Mary and the Second Person of the Trinity was the only person to be born of Mary. If anyone had attempted to touch Mary sexually they would have instantly died. Even apart from that, no man would have had casual contact with any woman not in his immediate family. It was not something that was done.

-Tim-
 
So with enough contortions and historiography, one can indeed divest marriage of what ordinary men take to be one of its sine qua non properties. Given current events, I’m not sure that’s comforting.
You’ll need to explain a bit more, I don’t want to assume what is intended. How have made contortions with regard to marriage? We know that marriage is a ‘man leaving father and mother, and becomes faithful to his wife: and the two will live in one spirit’. (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:5). That is a man and woman unite themselves becoming like the essence of one person. Mary and Joseph together are as one person in this unity they both are joined to as one flesh with God ~ which, by the way, is the view of a Catholic marriage. Furthermore, these two united together in one spirit with God are ‘Church’. So, as I see it Mary, receiving God’s progeny becomes ‘Church’
But if it’s so, all that’s an argument for Mary & Joseph’s not getting married in the first place: if she was “the spouse of the Holy Ghost” in the senses you claim, then of course Joseph would’ve been wrong to lay a hand on her. But he would’ve been no less wrong to consent to a marriage ceremony, live in the same house as she did, and go around letting people refer to him as her husband, or her his wife.
It seems Joseph had a great deal of apprehension. It took a special messenger to get him to take Mary. Also, it was customary among ascetics to marry for the needs of a household.
In the end, there’s no suggesting that Joseph & Mary weren’t really husband and wife that doesn’t end up besmirching them on other grounds. (This assumes that the common Protestant assumption somehow “besmirches” them in the first place–that, as Catholics seem to believe, ordinary, legitimate marriage is for spiritual second-raters and somehow unworthy of Mary)
I didn’t say Joseph and Mary weren’t really husband and wife - you’ve assumed it. Marriage isn’t predicated on the physical, rather it is predicated on the union. It is your mind that reaches for the lowest denominator to judge what is ‘real marriage’ and what isn’t. The Protestant does ‘besmirch’ Christ’s Person and Mary as His mother. What makes one ‘second-rater’ is to fail a clear vision of Christ through the lens of Mary. As I’ve said it divides Christ into human or God, but never Theandros.

JoeT
 
Not so. If that were true, God would not have prohibited anyone except the priests touching it. There is a great danger in “spiritualizing” away the connection between soul and body. We are not just souls, but bodies, bodies that will be resurrected, bodies that, in the persons of Jesus and Mary, have been taken into heaven, glorified for all eternity, as ours will be. Mary’s person was inviolate to all men. She did not and could not, without breaking her vow to God, have had sexual relations with a man. That is what it means.
The arc was just a box. It did nothing until the tablets were placed inside. Bezalel and Oholiab created it per Moses’ instructions. Nothing happened to them.
 
The arc was just a box. It did nothing until the tablets were placed inside. Bezalel and Oholiab created it per Moses’ instructions. Nothing happened to them.
It was especially constructed for only one purpose–to contain the Law, thus making it holy. Mary was preserved free of original sin and filled with grace from the moment of her conception, so when was she holy enough according to you? God created her for only one purpose–to be the Mother of God Incarnate. Try again.
 
It was especially constructed for only one purpose–to contain the Law, thus making it holy. Mary was preserved free of original sin and filled with grace from the moment of her conception, so when was she holy enough according to you? God created her for only one purpose–to be the Mother of God Incarnate. Try again.
If you took the tablets out of the box. The box was inert. If you are making the comparison literal wouldn’t the birth of Christ make Mary “inert” as well? In other words while she carried the Christ in her womb, she was the arc. When He was born she no longer was.
 
If you took the tablets out of the box. The box was inert. If you are making the comparison literal wouldn’t the birth of Christ make Mary “inert” as well? In other words while she carried the Christ in her womb, she was the arc. When He was born she no longer was.
No. Once the Ark had been constructed it was set aside for only one purpose, no matter if it still contained the tablets of the Law or not. It was the same for all the things made for the worship of God from the candlesticks to the Tabernacle itself. Mary’s whole life was vowed to God, not just her womb.
 
The arc was just a box. It did nothing until the tablets were placed inside. Bezalel and Oholiab created it per Moses’ instructions. Nothing happened to them.
You simply have no idea what you are talking about. The men selected were the ones who could craft it. Once it was crafted, and consecrated, it could never be touched again. And just as the serving instruments and other items in the tabernacle that are mentioned in my prior posts were consecrated, they could not be touched either. NONE of the items reserved to God could be touched unless EXPLICITLY given permission from God to do so. So NO, the Ark was NOT just a box. That is an insult to God who declared that the Ark was holy and reserved for Him.
 
*Revelation 11:19 Then God’s temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant could be seen in the temple. There were flashes of lightning, rumblings, and peals of thunder, an earthquake, and a violent hailstorm. 12:1 A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars. 2 She was with child and wailed aloud in pain as she labored to give birth. 3 Then another sign appeared in the sky; it was a huge red dragon, with seven heads and ten horns, and on its heads were seven diadems. 4 Its tail swept away a third of the stars in the sky and hurled them down to the earth. Then the dragon stood before the woman about to give birth, to devour her child when she gave birth. 5 **She gave birth to a son, a male child, destined to rule all the nations with an iron rod. Her child was caught up to God and his throne. *6 The woman herself fled into the desert where she had a place prepared by God, that there she might be taken care of for twelve hundred and sixty days.

In John’s vision, the Ark is seen, but suddenly, it changes to a woman who is pregnant with the ruler who will rule all nations. Hmmmmm.
 
Not to be pedantic, but I didn’t state that Mary is just “body”. I was emphasizing the fact that we are not just souls and not just bodies, but souls and bodies–that both are equally important, as demonstrated by the fact that both Jesus and Mary’s bodies were taken to heaven. Naturally, their souls are a part of their bodies. 🙂 Too many people have the heretical idea that our bodies don’t matter–that they are simply vessels for the soul–an idea that came about during the reformation and has poisoned portions of Christianity ever since. The poster denied that the Ark itself was a holy object, but only its contents. This is patently not true, just as it would not be true to say that only Mary or Jesus’ souls were holy and not the whole of their persons, bodies and souls. Does that make sense?
I understood, I was simply restating your comment for my own purposes - it helps me focus on a particular subject. I’m sorry if I lead you to believe anything else.

Your comments made absolute sense in both posts.

JoeT
 
No. Once the Ark had been constructed it was set aside for only one purpose, no matter if it still contained the tablets of the Law or not. It was the same for all the things made for the worship of God from the candlesticks to the Tabernacle itself. Mary’s whole life was vowed to God, not just her womb.
The arc was taken/lost/destroyed in the Babylonian conquest. People moved it.

Alters and Churches are desanctified. It’s not an all or nothing thing.
 
No. Once the Ark had been constructed it was set aside for only one purpose, no matter if it still contained the tablets of the Law or not. It was the same for all the things made for the worship of God from the candlesticks to the Tabernacle itself. Mary’s whole life was vowed to God, not just her womb.
This is true. The Ark was holy even when it was empty.

Jews believed that the Ark was intrinsically holy, not just because of what it held but because it was a physical manifestationof God on earth. It was the only such physical object of its kind on earth.

The Midrash and the Talmud are valuable insights into what the Jews believed about the Ark. There is an easy to read article at jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/ark.html.

-Tim-
 
Mary is holy because she is the mother of God. Motherhood does not end at birth, but enters a new phase. It also does not end with the death of a Child. So she continues to be the mother of Jesus and of the Church.

Of course, she is also the wife of Joseph, her spouse who had every right in the eyes of God to consummate the marriage. They chose not to, not because of a death threat held over the head of Joseph, but out of a desire to love God and image the trinity through their spiritual marriage.
 
This is true. The Ark was holy even when it was empty.

Jews believed that the Ark was intrinsically holy, not just because of what it held but because it was a physical manifestationof God on earth. It was the only such physical object of its kind on earth.

The Midrash and the Talmud are valuable insights into what the Jews believed about the Ark. There is an easy to read article at jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/ark.html.

-Tim-
When was it empty? Before it was filled? It wasn’t striking people dead then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top