T
TMC
Guest
Everything I have read says that it is a text used by sedevacantists and other dissidents to attack Vatican II and so forth. It seems like an unreliable conspiratorial tract to me, much like the Protocols.
1.Because they are human and don’t know any better.How is it that some Catholic priests are part of it?
These seems internally inconsistent to me. I think we have very different views on these issues. I think readers should know, though, that this document is viewed with some suspicion by many people.The other thing I’ll say (and I fully accept Vatican II, the popes, etc.) is that there is no coincidence that people have been falling away from the Catholic faith since Vatican II and more importantly our Church’s stance on education to the Laity is very poor.
With respect, it seems inconsistent to say that you accept Vatican II and the Popes, while simultaneous suggesting that Vatican II is responsible for a falling away from the faith.What is internally inconsistent? (not firing back, just would like some clarification)
and what is your different view?