U
unafraid
Guest
Muckraking!! Just more muckraking!! And I agree with every word of response to this thread which has been written by Corki and Sailor, Save me a spot at the battlements, I’ll be right there with you.
St Michael the Archangleboston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/04/12/east_longmeadow_priest_calls_for_pope_to_resign_over_coverup_of_clergy_abuse/
And so it begins as we turn on one another…
LOL! Along withe the comprehensive health insurance and 401K?Yes. And the Holy Spirit continues to protect and guide the Pope in any teachings on faith and morals. I think that’s listed under benefits![]()
Begins? I’ve met a number of priests, both active and retired, who opposed Raztinger’s ascention to the papacy. They choose to obey him but, if asked, have no qualms about stating their belief that he should not be Pope. This is nothing new.And so it begins as we turn on one another…
There’s nothing in our faith that says the Pope will always be a good Pope.As Catholics, this is a part of our faith. If you’re not, who cares?
No, the Pope was elected to his position by men - the College of Cardinals, to be specific.
Don’t they act through the holy spirit though? (I’m no expert-just asking!)
That’s the claim…
As Catholics, this is a part of our faith. If you’re not, who cares?
I was responding to the post that the Cardinals are guided by the Holy Spirit when they elect the Pope. TedDC’s post appears to doubt this. But I could be wrong about himThere’s nothing in our faith that says the Pope will always be a good Pope.
OK then, a priest who has been deluded by anti-Catholic bilge.How can you dismiss as “anti-Catholic bilge” a homily by a Cathlic priest? You may disagree with the priest, but are you denying that he is a priest? Are you saying that his bishop is to be faulted for ordaining a anti-Catholic to the presbyterate?
It is scandalous to go public like this especially when the evidence is less than compelling.It is not “un-Catholic” to suggest that a pope step down. It is not a heresy.
Uhh the people who thought JP II should step down didn’t want him to step down for health reasons but because of upholding Catholic teaching. (i.e. Roman Protestants).Several people thought JP II should step down for health reasons near the end of his life. That didn’t make them ‘bad-Cathoics.’
Of course it`s nothing new!Begins? I’ve met a number of priests, both active and retired, who opposed Raztinger’s ascention to the papacy. They choose to obey him but, if asked, have no qualms about stating their belief that he should not be Pope. This is nothing new.
:sad_yes:If the Church is in trouble, it is not because of Benedict.
It is because individual Catholics proudly trumpet their heresy, flock in great numbers to worship at the altar of secular news, and jump on the bandwagon of a Judas wannabe who slavers at his upcoming thirty pieces of silver.
The Rev. James J. Scahill describes himself as "rather a reclusive person.’’ He insists he is no rebel.
But the parish priest from East Longmeadow was fielding media calls from around the country yesterday about his request from the pulpit on Sunday that Pope Benedict XVI step down over his handling of clergy sexual abuse.
In an interview, Scahill sounded exhausted but firm as he reasserted his critique of the pope: "The right thing is to be truthful, and if he is not up to dealing with this, then he should have the integrity to resign.’’
Scahill has been an outspoken critic of the church’s handling of sexual abuse cases since shortly after he arrived at St. Michael’s church in 2002, the year the clergy abuse scandal exploded in Massachusetts.
He infuriated the local church hierarchy by withholding payments to the Springfield Diocese until it did away with a fund to assist dismissed priests.
He made national news by pressing for a fuller investigation of the 1972 killing of a Springfield boy whose parents attribute their son’s death to an abusive priest.
And he helped to reveal the sexual misconduct of former Springfield Bishop Thomas L. Dupre, who abruptly resigned after he was confronted with accusations that he had abused children as a parish priest.
Only if one had so little knowledge that one swallowed whole inaccurate media depictions of then-Cardinal Ratzinger, his position, the function of the office he held, etc.One might argue that Cardinal Ratzinger’s handling of sexual abuse cases exhibits a failure to grasp basic moral theology…
**You apparently have never read any of Pope Benedict XVI’s teachings on moral theology or heard any of his homilies or witnessed his lifelong service…One might argue that Cardinal Ratzinger’s handling of sexual abuse cases exhibits a failure to grasp basic moral theology…
Such as…?One might argue that Cardinal Ratzinger’s handling of sexual abuse cases exhibits a failure to grasp basic moral theology…
Now, that’s just funny!One might argue that Cardinal Ratzinger’s handling of sexual abuse cases exhibits a failure to grasp basic moral theology…