McCain: Dictators 'get started by suppressing free press'

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sy_Noe
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You mean when he makes what YOU think are outrageous statements. I happen to agree wih the President’s assessment of the media. They have been the enemy of the American people for a long time pushing a liberal agenda while pretending to be objective.
Indeed.The media has been manipulating the news,going at least as far back as Thomas Jefferson’s time.He actually wrote something calling the press putrid and that if one avoided the press entirely,they would actually be better informed than if they bothered to read the news. So the more things change the more they stay the same it seems.:eek:
 
Indeed.The media has been manipulating the news,going at least as far back as Thomas Jefferson’s time.He actually wrote something calling the press putrid and that if one avoided the press entirely,they would actually be better informed than if they bothered to read the news. So the more things change the more they stay the same it seems.:eek:
How can you not see how dangerous this is?
 
You mean when he makes what YOU think are outrageous statements. I happen to agree wih the President’s assessment of the media. They have been the enemy of the American people for a long time pushing a liberal agenda while pretending to be objective.
Of course, I think it outrageous; there is considerable bipartisan agreement on that. If you think this, and moreover think that this is is the kind of thing the POTUS should say, great.
You wil break the flimsy Trump coalition in no time.
 
Exactly. They have always pushed the liberal agenda. They are just upset the POTUS is republican and has the guts to call them out on their biased unfair reporting.
It has been noted that many Presidents, Obama back to Jefferson, have called the press out for perceptions of unfairness. None before have called them ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE. We can hope that this is just more empty rhetoric from Trump, but have to be on guard if it isn’t.
 
How can you not see how dangerous this is?
Oh the media can continue business as usual for all I care.I just don’t have to buy into and hang on their very word.as gospel. It is incumbent upon all of us to weed through the biases’ and discern the truth through all the muck.
 
Oh the media can continue business as usual for all I care.I just don’t have to buy into and hang on their very word.as gospel. It is incumbent upon all of us to weed through the biases’ and discern the truth through all the muck.
So long as that includes the biases of the right as well as those of the left.
 
So long as that include the biases of the right as well as those of the left.
Not saying there are not biases’ on the right,however considering the media as a whole,the biases’ clearly would lean in favor of the left as there are disproportionately more left leaning news outlets,
 
Not saying there are not biases’ on the right,however considering the media as a whole,the biases’ clearly would lean in favor of the left as there are disproportionately more left leaning news outlets,
Not on radio.
 
Not on radio.
That should tell you something re the market demand for Conservative radio.Thirty some years ago when Rush Limbaugh came on the talk circuit,I remember my husband telling me,“Finally someone saying the things I have felt for years!” We have a voice after being marginalized by the left leaning media. The rest is history so to speak.I know there were a few liberal left talk shows,they never thrived because their message wasn’t resonating with thevAmerican listening audience.
 
That should tell you something re the market demand for Conservative radio.Thirty some years ago when Rush Limbaugh came on the talk circuit,I remember my husband telling me,“Finally someone saying the things I have felt for years!” We have a voice after being marginalized by the left leaning media. The rest is history so to speak.I know there were a few liberal left talk shows,they never thrived because their message wasn’t resonating with thevAmerican listening audience.
Just from general observation it appears the left has dominated the landscape (at least in a broader spectrum) more than the conservative voice;

Left newspapers
Right talk radio
Left televised news/opinion
Left satire/political comedy
 
Only if they work outside of their own bubble.

The unsavory aspects of Sanger’s background are widely known. On the other hand, the organization that she founded is viewed favorably by some 60% of Americans. Hard to imagine a story on this award as having legs.
MOST planned parenthood clinics are in poor neighborhoods. They do what Margaret Sanger was all about. Reducing or elimination in her view as a racist and eugenicist, populations of those she considers, undesirables.

Where’s the press on THAT?

And what is it specifically that you are defending?
d:
On the other hand, the KKK is seen very negatively by most Americans. This is why accepting an award from them would be newsworthy.
Where is even a sense of proportion in that response?

Planned Parenthood DAILY ends the life of 1000’s of innocent lives. To hit the number of 1,5 million/yr abortions in this country, that means 4,100 infants / day are murdered. And that’s ok with you because 60% of Americans favor THAT? BTW that favorability percentage for abortions you quote, is thanks to prayer, and God’s grace, dropping.
d:
If you are looking for a press to promote your personal perspectives, then you are likely to be disappointed.
for the record, I’m not defending this on “my personal perspective”. It’s the perspective of The Catholic Church, scripture, and Sacred Tradition. I’m just echoing that perspective

IMV, what we’ve seen is a press that suppresses the truth, NOT a suppressing of the press.
 
Hillary this and Hillary that. Hillary is not the POTUS. I don’t know which is more tiresome. The devotees of Trump deflecting to Hillary or to Obama when they can’t offer any other defense of whom they follow. :yawn:
The point which you try and sidestep,which I was pointing out, is the “suppressing by a free press”

I was showing where the press has NOT been suppressed, the press freely suppressed stories on their own, they should be covering.
 
Just from general observation it appears the left has dominated the landscape (at least in a broader spectrum) more than the conservative voice;

Left newspapers
Right talk radio
Left televised news/opinion
Left satire/political comedy
Exactly!
 
You realize there doesn’t have to be a 50/50 split on every opinion? There are universal truths and established cultural norms that become the center of public opinion, and permeate our media. Just because secular news advocates for the climate or same sex marriage - doesn’t mean that there needs to be equally countervailing view points with equal prominence. Those topics have been decided generally as a society - there are countervailing views, but those are the minority.

I don’t buy that there are 2 sides to every argument, nor that there should be in many cases.
 
You realize there doesn’t have to be a 50/50 split on every opinion? There are universal truths and established cultural norms that become the center of public opinion, and permeate our media. Just because secular news advocates for the climate or same sex marriage - doesn’t mean that there needs to be equally countervailing view points with equal prominence. Those topics have been decided generally as a society - there are countervailing views, but those are the minority.

I don’t buy that there are 2 sides to every argument, nor that there should be in many cases.
So you would rather suppress right wing media
 
So you would rather suppress right wing media
Not at all. I just don’t know what you want? Right wing media exists (Fox is #1 fyi). The rest of the media reflect cultural and societal norms, and do not represent a left/right swing.
 
You realize there doesn’t have to be a 50/50 split on every opinion? There are universal truths and established cultural norms that become the center of public opinion, and permeate our media. Just because secular news advocates for the climate or same sex marriage - doesn’t mean that there needs to be equally countervailing view points with equal prominence. Those topics have been decided generally as a society - there are countervailing views, but those are the minority.

I don’t buy that there are 2 sides to every argument, nor that there should be in many cases.
Can this be real?.. someone on the left that is (seemingly) against the Fairness Doctrine??? I am shocked.
 
There is a clear matter of proportion involved. When you refer to the press, not simply as wrong or partisan, but as ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE, a clear line has been crossed.

So yes the outrage is selective; it is applied when the POTUS makes outrageous remarks.
Exactly
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top