G
Gorgias
Guest
I’m not sure I understand what this means. Greek is an inflected language; so, even though this particular form doesn’t show up (that is, a perfect participle middle/passive nominative feminine singular), the word shows up elsewhere in Scripture!I think the ambiguity lies in the fact that the word was not known before this time
Again, I’m not really sure this holds:, and I don’t believe its ever been used in any other passage, other than alluding back to the Word used in reference to Mary.
In Ephesians we have the same word (in a different inflection): ἐχαρίτωσεν.
And, in Sirach 18:17, we have:
οὐκ ἰδοὺ λόγος ὑπὲρ δόμα ἀγαθόν καὶ ἀμφότερα παρὰ ἀνδρὶ κεχαριτωμένῳ
(“Lo, is not a word better than a gift? But both are with a justified man.”)
So, I’m not really getting what you’re saying here…
That’s a whole different discussion, of course, and it centers on whether you look at etymologically (ἐπι–ούσιον, or “upon” “the substance”) or as a cognate of ἐπιοῦσα (“the following day”). Anyway, whole 'nother thing…!Christians throughout the centuries have had a similar dilemma with the words “Give us this day our daily bread…”. This also is a word unknown before Jesus’ use of it in the Sermon on the Mount (Matt 6?). The word best translates to “supersubstantial”.