G
guanophore
Guest
Will your look over Acts. 10 and tell me, at what point did this occur for Cornelius?Code:All our works, performed before Rebirth's into Christ, are as straw.
Will your look over Acts. 10 and tell me, at what point did this occur for Cornelius?Code:All our works, performed before Rebirth's into Christ, are as straw.
I think in 1Cor3 Paul was speaking in general terms, about a principle. Apparently different levels of justice are achieved in this life resulting in different levels of glory or esteem in the next life. He wasn’t implying that he knew the eternal fate of each and every person addressed by his letter, as if he could say that any particular person, whether doing good works or worthless ones, would definitely be saved. He couldn’t even say that about himself, according to Phil 3:7-14“Works” are understood as judicially neutral actions that have no possibility of making one fall under God’s eternal judgment. Hence, anytime the Scripture specifies a judgment for the Christian’s works, Protestants presuppose that the bad works cannot be equated with sin. Since it is believed that Christ paid the punishment for all the Christian’s sins, thus making judgment for sin complete, it is concluded that the judgment for bad works in 1 Cor 3:13-15 must necessarily exclude any evaluation or penalty for one’s sins. Once they are made to be totally separate from sin, Protestant “works” are then available to be judged by their own merits or demerits."
The above qoute came from Robert Sugenis. So Christ did not deal with the punishment due to God’s sin? Then what was his atonement good for? What do you guys say with the scriptural verses that say does that are in Christ are no longer judged in sin and will not have their inequities counted towards them? Is that only dealing with past sins before baptism?
I would say even further, every human soul will be judged, whether they have been reborn into Christ, or not.Code:So Corinthians was not saying that everyone that is reborn into Christ will not be judged by God no matter how they behave or act in this life?
“Merit” means to be “worthy”, and thus we all must strictly become worthy of eternal life. The purpose of God’s grace is to create this worthiness in us, so that we are fit for the Kingdom of heaven.Plus we can never strictly merit eternal life since our works can never equal it.
Will look up tonite, but I think I know where ur going here.Will your look over Acts. 10 and tell me, at what point did this occur for Cornelius?
Then you got my point. In the Latin Church this is called prevenient (drawing) grace, and is available to every human being. Those who respond to drawing grace are given even more grace, so that they are enabled to come to the repentance you describe.Will look up tonite, but I think I know where ur going here.
I will stipulate that our actions leading up to and including First Confession are Meritorious, and could indeed be seen so by God as a Good Work(s).
In point of fact … the hardest decision/ mental WORK ( if you will) I ever made, was making First Confession & telling Christ I desired to be Reborn and become His disciple. Satan was using every trick he knew to prevent my praying the Sinner’s Prayer & asking for grace unto Salvation.
Nevertheless, in hindsight, w/o God’s grace to overcome my doubts, I wouldn’t of stood up to satan and denied him, and chosen Christ. So, I’d have to admit, my short-term actions (work of confession) was meritorious …but, clearly enabled by GOD’s grace to me. His grace overcame my straw, and effected ‘gracious’ work of eternal value.
So if we respond, via free will …then God REWARDS us with more grace !!Then you got my point. In the Latin Church this is called prevenient (drawing) grace, and is available to every human being. Those who respond to drawing grace are given even more grace, so that they are enabled to come to the repentance you describe.
Thank you Vinny.But merit is only based on God’s promise to reward not on some strict legal contract. You have misunderstood the catholic meaning of merit if you think it means anything in any strict sense. Also God can never be our debtor or under obligation to us outside of some convental promise or unless he has ordained that it shpuld be so. I suggest you look up the meaning of condign merit. Merit does not mean worthy in Catholic theology, I have not read one catholic book or cathecism that has described merit as worthiness and neither did Aquinas. Merit does not mean deserve or earn either. Here is what Jimmy Akin said about the subject of merit:
"Thus in Catholic theology, merit is in no way earning, but identical with the concept of reward. Brought about by God’s grace, acts which please God are done by Christians (Phil. 4:18, Col. 1:9-10, 1Th. 4:1, Heb. 13:16, 13:20-21) and God chooses to reward them (Rom. 2:6, 1 Cor. 3:8, 4:6, 2 Cor. 5:10, Gal. 6:6-10, Rev. 2:23, 22:12). These elements, God’s grace, the acts pleasing to God that they bring about, and the reward God chooses to give, are the key elements in the Catholic theology of merit, as we shall see.
The doctrine of merit is thus the same as the doctrine of rewards. To help Protestant readers grasp this and cut through the linguistic confusion experienced on this point because of the associations of the term “merit” in the Protestant vocabulary, they should try substituting “reward” or “rewardable action” or “to perform a rewardable action” for “merit” in what follows. This should cut through the confusion."
Aquinas said (from First Part of the Second Part - Question 114 - Article 3But merit is only based on God’s promise to reward not on some strict legal contract. You have misunderstood the catholic meaning of merit if you think it means anything in any strict sense. Also God can never be our debtor or under obligation to us outside of some convental promise or unless he has ordained that it shpuld be so. I suggest you look up the meaning of condign merit. Merit does not mean worthy in Catholic theology, I have not read one catholic book or cathecism that has described merit as worthiness and neither did Aquinas. Merit does not mean deserve or earn either. Here is what Jimmy Akin said about the subject of merit:
"Thus in Catholic theology, merit is in no way earning, but identical with the concept of reward. Brought about by God’s grace, acts which please God are done by Christians (Phil. 4:18, Col. 1:9-10, 1Th. 4:1, Heb. 13:16, 13:20-21) and God chooses to reward them (Rom. 2:6, 1 Cor. 3:8, 4:6, 2 Cor. 5:10, Gal. 6:6-10, Rev. 2:23, 22:12). These elements, God’s grace, the acts pleasing to God that they bring about, and the reward God chooses to give, are the key elements in the Catholic theology of merit, as we shall see.
The doctrine of merit is thus the same as the doctrine of rewards. To help Protestant readers grasp this and cut through the linguistic confusion experienced on this point because of the associations of the term “merit” in the Protestant vocabulary, they should try substituting “reward” or “rewardable action” or “to perform a rewardable action” for “merit” in what follows. This should cut through the confusion."
But although the work is worthy, are we?"If, however, we speak of a meritorious work, inasmuch as it proceeds from the grace of the Holy Ghost moving us to life everlasting, it is meritorious of life everlasting condignly [ie by worthiness]. For thus the value of its merit depends upon the power of the Holy Ghost moving us to life everlasting according to Jn. 4:14: “Shall become in him a fount of water springing up into life everlasting.” And the worth of the work depends on the dignity of grace, whereby a man, being made a partaker of the Divine Nature, is adopted as a son of God, to whom the inheritance is due by right of adoption, according to Rm. 8:17: “If sons, heirs also.”
Yes…Vinny I found this (that I overlooked before).
Aquinas said (from First Part of the Second Part - Question 114 - Article 3
Whether a man in grace can merit eternal life condignly?)
But although the work is worthy, are we?
I believe Yes!
peace
steve
But isn’t it still true that they’d deny those rewards include eternal life?I am glad to see people agree with me that merit does not mean worthiness but only reward. You can check the catechism, Aquinas, or Ludwig OTT to prove that I am correct. Once we realize that merit is only a synonym for reward in catholic theology than we can see that the protestant objection to merit is baseless since they also believe in reward for works.
Vinny213…I am glad to see people agree with me that merit does not mean worthiness but only reward. You can check the catechism, Aquinas, or Ludwig OTT to prove that I am correct. Once we realize that merit is only a synonym for reward in catholic theology than we can see that the protestant objection to merit is baseless since they also believe in reward for works.
Hey Vinny,I am glad to see people agree with me that merit does not mean worthiness but only reward. You can check the catechism, Aquinas, or Ludwig OTT to prove that I am correct. Once we realize that merit is only a synonym for reward in catholic theology than we can see that the protestant objection to merit is baseless since they also believe in reward for works.
Rewarding us more grace is just out of His free will, not that because we have responded to one.So if we respond, via free will …then God REWARDS us with more grace !!
As scripture says " grace upon grace"![]()
Peter, in his first sermon @ Pentecost, when he and all were filled with HS, said to his audience" repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the GIFT of Holy Spirit" …So those who received his word were BAPTIZED, and there were added that day about 3000 souls. And they devoted themselves to the Apostles TEACHING and FELLOWSHIP, to the BREAKING OF BREAD ( EUCHARIST) and the PRAYERS. …And all who believed WERE TOGETHER and HAD ALL THINGS IN COMMON…And day by day, ATTENDING THE TEMPLE TOGETHER and BREAKING BREAD …with GLAD and GENEROUS HEARTS, PRAISING GOD and HAVING FAVOR with All people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.Its also important to point out that merits are God’s gift to us, but beacsue of our cooperation with his grace they can also properly be called ours, that is the dynamics of synergy. To those wondering what my beliefs are I am a believer though I dont associate with any specific strain of Christain thought whether protestant, catholic, or orthodox.
This is the essence of the Catholic faith found in the beginning. They did not continuously question and look for disputes. Christianity is not a strain of thought. It is a family. The Catholic faith has many hard to understand doctrines. I can understand a process of learning their meaning and purpose. But This passage is the heart of the Mass and Christian Charity. Breaking Bread was what our Lord established and re-inforced after his resurection. It has ALL blessings associated with it, including the unity of all of us.Peter, in his first sermon @ Pentecost, when he and all were filled with HS, said to his audience" repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the GIFT of Holy Spirit" …So those who received his word were BAPTIZED, and there were added that day about 3000 souls. And they devoted themselves to the Apostles TEACHING and FELLOWSHIP, to the BREAKING OF BREAD ( EUCHARIST) and the PRAYERS. …And all who believed WERE TOGETHER and HAD ALL THINGS IN COMMON…And day by day, ATTENDING THE TEMPLE TOGETHER and BREAKING BREAD …with GLAD and GENEROUS HEARTS, PRAISING GOD and HAVING FAVOR with All people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.