L
Lujack
Guest
Well, the only bearing Latin has on this thread is whether or not it would reduce the segregation amongst parishes, uniting Hispanic immigrants and others-past evidence would show that it did not integrate the Irish, the Italians, the Poles, and the Slavs.Then I stand corrected. I had always thought that the homily constituted a “break” in the liturgy.
These differences had no bearing whatsoever on the liturgy, which as you said, was in Latin. Rather these were matters of the community its self. The difference between an Irish parish and an Italian parish in 20th century America was the difference in what Paddy Quinn’s family ate on Monday and what Eugene Castelle’s family ate and in what language they talked over dinner.
So yes you could still go to Mass in Warsaw or Buenas Aires and it would be the same. The community would be different, but what do you expect?
Anything else to do with Latin is really more for a general discussion on the liturgy-I like Latin myself, and think that it does solve some problems, but just because hammers are good tools doesn’t mean they are meant to fix leaky pipes.
Learn Latin from what? Does it mean “I will go into the altar of God”, “Ire a altar de dios”, “Irai a autel de dieu”, or the Italian equivalent or the Russian? You need to know a language to learn a language unless you learn by immersion, and that’s not practical.Learn Latin. Honestly… it really does not take much to understand what "Introíbo ad altáre Dei" means.