D
dermot2
Guest
I’m talking about bad economy, loss of innocence for children, immorality in schools and in the media --I could go on…
Would you also be in favor, as I am, of revoking the medical license from any doctor who deliberately kills an unborn human being?NFL is allowing Michael Vick back on the field under some type of probation.
Well, there’s a lack of integrity on the part of the NFL and Vick. Vick was charged with cruelty to animals having had them fight on his property and cruelly executed when the dogs failed to win or got old or injured.
Thirty-eight of the 40 pit bulls were rehabilitated by a CA rescue group. Two of the animals had to be put down.
Amen! There is a disconnect in our society that becomes especially evident when you see Michael Vick versus George Tiller. If we’re going to apply standards of decency when dealing with life and death, let’s at least apply those standards somewhat equally. (i know animal lives are not as valuable as human lives, but you have to wonder when people like George Tiller are referred to as “Doctor” and Michael Vick is referred to as a criminal; i think they’re both criminals to one degree or another)Te be fair, I have heard that Michael Vick has been working with the Humane Society. Maybe there is some real repentance there, maybe it’s cynical publicity. I don’t know.
I wonder, will there be this level of outrage when Donte Stallworth is reinstated by the league? Seems there’s a lot more outrage about animal death than human death…
Yes, I would be in favor of revoking a doctor’s medical license who deliberately killed through abortion. What made you think I wouldn’t?Would you also be in favor, as I am, of revoking the medical license from any doctor who deliberately kills an unborn human being?
Hint: a human being, whether born or unborn, is much more precious than any animal.
John
I guess I’m tired of hearing so much about cruelty to animals while not much is being said, at least in the lamestream media, about the greater evil of the killing of an unborn human being. I hope you don’t mind that I point this out on the thread you started.Yes, I would be in favor of revoking a doctor’s medical license who deliberately killed through abortion. What made you think I wouldn’t?
Tiller’s sobriquet was Tiller the Killer. What he did, as we know, was and is legal in our society. For me, a disconnect came when the Reformed Lutheran Church, of which he and his wife were active members, held a memorial in a Methodist Church for a man who murdered 60,000 babies. What were they thinking? How could either church have found anything Christian(Christ like) about this man?Amen! There is a disconnect in our society that becomes especially evident when you see Michael Vick versus George Tiller. If we’re going to apply standards of decency when dealing with life and death, let’s at least apply those standards somewhat equally. (i know animal lives are not as valuable as human lives, but you have to wonder when people like George Tiller are referred to as “Doctor” and Michael Vick is referred to as a criminal; i think they’re both criminals to one degree or another)
I think people tend to have more sympathy for dogs is because they are so helpless and innocent. They have no control over who’s hands they are in. Same with children. Adult women can call 911, leave the guy, and choose who they date. I was disgusted when Rihanna took Chris Brown back initially. There is no way those tortured dogs would’ve returned to Vick if given the choice.What makes me sick is that there seems to be more public outrage at a celebrity’s abuse of dogs than a celebrity’s abuse of a wife/husband. Michael Vick goes to jail for abusing dogs. Chris Brown probably won’t go to jail for abusing his ex-girlfriend. That’s what makes me sick.
Vick is a sadist. He got pleasure out of watching animals suffer. That’s sick.I guess I’m tired of hearing so much about cruelty to animals while not much is being said, at least in the lamestream media, about the greater evil of the killing of an unborn human being. I hope you don’t mind that I point this out on the thread you started.
Thanks,
John
So is a rock.I think people tend to have more sympathy for dogs is because they are so helpless and innocent.
*You make an interesting point there. In the interview, not sure if you caught it, I think the Human Society President made a comment, that although he is skeptical, he said that permanently punishing someone doesn’t help young kids who might be exposed to this, to change their lives. My thought is that sometimes we do things in life that are bad, that are sinful, but if we can get up, be contrite and remorseful, and repentant…we can help shape the lives of others going down a similiar path. I think that is how Vick’s crimes can help him to turn to God, and how he can help others to.So is a rock.
Not that animals are inanimate or unfeeling, but humans are higher above animals to a greater degree than a dog is above a rock. I think comparing innocent suffering of animals to the innocent suffering of humans fails to understand just what it means to be made in God’s image. When a man takes pleasure in being cruel to an animal, it is his soul that will suffer the greatest damage. I believe like most that animal cruelity is unexcusable, but it does not deserve permanent punishment.
Animals feel physical pain just as we do. They feel emotion in similar ways. This doesn’t mean they are of equal worth. It just means that there suffering matters just as much, which doesn’t mean their lives value just as much. For example, humanely euthanizing an animal is not comparable to euthanizing a human, but torturing one is of a similar nature to torturing a human. Most serial killers start on animals. All God’s creatures deserve to be treated humanely, and those of us who are given dominion over the others have a special responsibility to the lesser. This doesn’t mean we are all equal.So is a rock.
Not that animals are inanimate or unfeeling, but humans are higher above animals to a greater degree than a dog is above a rock. I think comparing innocent suffering of animals to the innocent suffering of humans fails to understand just what it means to be made in God’s image. When a man takes pleasure in being cruel to an animal, it is his soul that will suffer the greatest damage. I believe like most that animal cruelity is unexcusable, but it does not deserve permanent punishment.
Why? Catholic sites often reflect Christian teaching, namely that Man is made in God’s image. No one here has advocated causing animals pain, though, just that the act of killing animals is not comparable to killing people. I said earlier that in Texas, for example, such an act is not even a felony. This is not to say that it is not a crime and should not be a crime. No, just that the punishment should not be comparable to crime against people.I dont know why many are talking about animals being of lower worth than humans. I believe different, but never mind my supposedly unChristian beliefs…they are not important. What is important here is animals feel as much pain as humans when tortured, and that in itself makes the act gravely wrong. I dont think its right that Micheal Vick can just go on with his life so soon.
Further even if you are someone who beleives non-human animals are worthless, the fact is a person who harms an innocent animal, its that much easier for him to harm an innocent child. Many people here have mentioned how animal abuse so so often leads to killing of humans etc.
Maybe in Texas and the rest of the country, killing animals like cows and chickens humanely is not a felony, however in the other 49 states, if you electrocute, shoot, hit with a baseball bat a dog because it did not win fighting, you go to jail. The dog fighting is a felony, the torture of animals for sport is a felony.Why? Catholic sites often reflect Christian teaching, namely that Man is made in God’s image. No one here has advocated causing animals pain, though, just that the act of killing animals is not comparable to killing people. I said earlier that in Texas, for example, such an act is not even a felony. This is not to say that it is not a crime and should not be a crime. No, just that the punishment should not be comparable to crime against people.
Do you not think Vick should ever be able to go one with his life, or that just not enough time has passed? Do you also reject the idea that a jury should be able to assess punishment and the rest of society should honor that?
As they should. No one is fighting the strawman that Vick should not have gone to jail, yet this strawman keeps getting stuffed.Maybe in Texas and the rest of the country, killing animals like cows and chickens humanely is not a felony, however in the other 49 states, if you electrocute, shoot, hit with a baseball bat a dog because it did not win fighting, you go to jail
No he didn’t. He signed with the Eagles. Practically, he is set waaayyyy back as a consequence of his crime, as he should be. But he has been allowed to play again.Like I posted earlier, vick can get on with his life, but he forfieted the privilege of a football career. He needs to find another avenue of employment.