Mitt Romney Presidential Campaign

  • Thread starter Thread starter Al_Moritz
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Having said that, I have no doubt most private colleges and universities accept some students on the basis of wealth, prestige, racial diversity, or political pull.

I just wouldn’t accuse someone getting in under those circumstances without evidence.
 
I just wouldn’t accuse someone getting in under those circumstances without evidence.
You are correct, that isn’t fair. Perhaps I’m a cynic. No, I’m definitely a cynic…and that applies across the board.

John
 
Not a chance.

Romney is losing the black vote 94 to…0.

He won’t get the hispanic vote, nor the woman vote. He obviously won’t get the gay vote, or the union vote. He keeps making stupid comments and most Americans believe he’s out of touch. Ryan was a smart movie to energize the conservative base, but it will cost him some moderates.
Do you really think that Herman Cain and Allen West are going to vote for Obama? Or JC Watts or Clarence Thomas or Condi?

Zero means they all would.

Romney is peeling off Black voters from Obama at nice, steady pace.

It’s worth noting that 35% or more of union household are republican and that Romney will get at least 43% of the Hispanic vote.

Republican presidential candidates usually don’t win the women vote, but Romney has made significant gains among female voters since 2008.

In fact, he’s gained in every single core democrat constituency.

Most moderates and independents will break for Romney. The only way they wouldn’t is by changing their party affiliation to republican and instead are counted as republicans.

That is certainly possible because republican registration has grown to over a whopping 37% of the electorate.

I don’t know where you get the idea that Romney is seen as “out of touch” because he is now leading the president in reliable polls.
 
Romney will get at least 43% of the Hispanic vote.
Republican presidential candidates usually don’t win the women vote, but Romney has made significant gains among female voters since 2008.
In fact, he’s gained in every single core democrat constituency.
Most moderates and independents will break for Romney. The only way they wouldn’t is by changing their party affiliation to republican and instead are counted as republicans.
That is certainly possible because republican registration has grown to over a whopping 37% of the electorate.
I don’t know where you get the idea that Romney is seen as “out of touch” because he is now leading the president in reliable polls.
You offer some interesting guesses…and that’s all they are since the election is still two months off.

BTW, what do you consider to be a reliable poll…only the one that show Romney winning?

This race is far from decided.

John
 
You offer some interesting guesses…and that’s all they are since the election is still two months off.

BTW, what do you consider to be a reliable poll…only the one that show Romney winning?

This race is far from decided.

John
This race is over. Obama knows, which is why his convention speech was far left 2008 re-tred.

What really worries me is a war with Iran started for political reasons as a last gasp attempt to win.
 
You offer some interesting guesses…and that’s all they are since the election is still two months off.

BTW, what do you consider to be a reliable poll…only the one that show Romney winning?

This race is far from decided.

John
The one on Nov 7
 
This race is over.
Well, thank goodness…now we can cancel all those political ads, stop all the campaign hops…tell the election boards they don’t need to show up.

Saying it don’t make it so,

John
 
You offer some interesting guesses…and that’s all they are since the election is still two months off.

BTW, what do you consider to be a reliable poll…only the one that show Romney winning?

This race is far from decided.

John
The number I use usually come from Rasmussen tracking. Rasmussen polls likely voters on an almost daily basis.

The polls I consider reliable are ones that a) survey likely, not registered voters b) survey the correct % of the population and c) are not skewed or weighted.

Most of the polls right now are not reliable because they fail to meet all of those three criteria. If you look back around this time McCain was building up to a 4-5 point lead and he lost by over 7.

What I am suggesting is that polls, when read properly, provide a window into the election.

The simple fact is that Obama is on pace to lose this election and lose big. That’s been the analysis among objective persons for some time. How do we know this?

Well, polling has been around in this country for decades and there are certain patterns that hold up each and every time.

If Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan continue to campaign at their current pace and if they can avoid scandal, they’ll be in a position to win in a landslide.
 
Well, thank goodness…now we can cancel all those political ads, stop all the campaign hops…tell the election boards they don’t need to show up.

Saying it don’t make it so,

John
And not saying it doesn’t make it not so. 😉
 
Why do you believe that?
“Half of Maine’s delegation were refused credentials when they arrived at the convention, and were replaced with hand-picked Romney supporters. You read that right, half of the legally elected delegates from Maine were disqualified because they didn’t intend to support Mitt Romney. After having paid for their plane tickets, hotel rooms, and all that, they were callously tossed to the side and ignored.”

reason.com/blog/2012/08/28/ron-paul-delegates-lose-first-two-rnc-fi

And here’s a bad one. According to the rules of the convention, if the majority of delegates for five states nominate a candidate, then that candidate’s name is officially listed as a candidate for the nomination. Yesterday, six states voted that way… but the leadership ignored it and only Mitt Romney was an official candidate. Votes cast for Paul were not even announced from the podium… only those for Romney.

reason.com/blog/2012/08/29/nevadas-ron-paul-kerfuffle-on-the-conven

Republicans like to paint themselves as the good guys, as the guys who follow the rules instead of letting the ends justify the means. Yesterday they fell far short of this ideal in their zeal to make certain that Romney was nominated. In trying to force party unity, they are creating a split in the party that was entirely avoidable.

reason.com/reasontv/2012/08/29/ron-paul-delegates-walk-off-convention-f

Now, regardless of what you think of Ron Paul, and I am not going to make the case for him. However, his delegates were stonewalled and states that legally were entitled to nominate who they wanted were marginalized and ignored. That is my problem with Reince Prebius. He picked Mitt Romney from the very beginning and has been using his position as chair to ensure that Romney got the nomination. That is against the GOP convention rules. The duty of the chair is to make sure that everyone plays by the rules and that the person who is legitimately picked by the majority of the party receives the nomination. What Reince Prebius did in this primary season is pull an Obama. He picked the winner ahead of time and broke the rules to make sure that happened.

I don’t want to hear Republicans talk about playing fair and by the rules and then just shrug their shoulders when the chairman of the convention displays this level of corruption. For those that wanted Romney, they are happy it happened. But what about 2016? What if Romney decides not to run again the next Chair decides he doesn’t want Ryan, but rather Herman Cain and breaks all of the rules to ensure that Cain gets the nomination? Or Rand Paul, or Marco Rubio. It isn’t the Establishment that is supposed to dictate who runs for office.

It is this very sort of horsepoo that caused me to leave the GOP. They talk a good game, but in the end they are just like the Democrats.
 
Scott LaFrance says Reince Prebius should be kicked out of the GOP for corruption.
I am much, much more concerned about a party of which atleast 1/2 wants to keep God out of the platform, than a party led by Reince Prebius which wants to keep a Libertarian who supported Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney for president in 2008 out of the rnc. Good riddance.

Ishii
 
It is this very sort of horsepoo that caused me to leave the GOP. They talk a good game, but in the end they are just like the Democrats.
“They are just like the Democrats.” It is this very sort of horsepoo that causes me to wonder about Ron Paul supporters. Ron Paul lost. Get over it.

The Democrats snub God.

The Republicans snub Ron Paul delegates.

Huge difference.

Ishii
 
I am much, much more concerned about a party of which atleast 1/2 wants to keep God out of the platform, than a party led by Reince Prebius which wants to keep a Libertarian who supported Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney for president in 2008 out of the rnc. Good riddance.

Ishii
So, you’d rather have a corrupt, crooked chair than an honest politician. Good luck with that. I don’t trust people who actually encourage corruption.

You seem to enjoy the corruption that has permeated the RNC. I am nauseated by it.
 
“They are just like the Democrats.” It is this very sort of horsepoo that causes me to wonder about Ron Paul supporters. Ron Paul lost. Get over it.

The Democrats snub God.

The Republicans snub Ron Paul delegates.

Huge difference.

Ishii
I could care less about Ron Paul. He is finished. I hope he enjoys his retirement. What does that have to do with the corruption of the RNC?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top