Mitt Romney Presidential Campaign

  • Thread starter Thread starter Al_Moritz
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It will also set a precedent we as a nation can’t afford. Every time control of congress changes political hands, they’ll repeal laws enacted by the previous congress, just out of revenge for the opposing party.
There was Prohibition. No country can afford to permit injustice. Reversing poor laws is something that democracy does.

I don’t think it will happen though. I think a more realistic expectation will be a modification that takes out the most distasteful parts.
 
There was Prohibition. No country can afford to permit injustice. Reversing poor laws is something that democracy does.

I don’t think it will happen though. I think a more realistic expectation will be a modification that takes out the most distasteful parts.
That would actually be good. Something we could agree to agree on, and something that doesn’t attack anybody and doesn’t scapegoat anybody. That’s how the system is SUPPOSED to work.

Now to get THERE and then figure out how the country’s going to pay for it without ending up totally broke. Good goals.
 
As a citizen of Massachusetts, I pray that Elizabeth Warren doesn’t win.
I notice that programs like this national health care mandate are often pushed and favored by those that will be exempt from them.
 
I notice that programs like this national health care mandate are often pushed and favored by those that will be exempt from them.
Absolutely. It’s always easier to prescribe nasty medicine for someone else than to take it yourself.
 
I notice that programs like this national health care mandate are often pushed and favored by those that will be exempt from them.
Yeah,funny how that works,huh?:rolleyes:Same thing with school vouchers,notice how all the politicians opposed to vouchers,send their own kiddos to private schools?Now they are beating the same drum as it applies to the Ryan plan for medicare vouchers.The Dems response is “not fair,as mostly rich folks will take advantage of the vouchers,leaving the poor with lousy health care”.Sounfd familiar ?:eek:
 
I notice that programs like this national health care mandate are often pushed and favored by those that will be exempt from them.
Well we do have Romney Care here in MA. However, Elizabeth Warren and her husband, are both professors at Harvard University. I doubt they have problems with getting affordable health insurance.

Jim
 
Nope, it will take 60 to get to defeat a filibuster, which the democrats will surely invoke if they try to repeal a big piece of legislation that was approved by a prior congressional body.

It will also set a precedent we as a nation can’t afford. Every time control of congress changes political hands, they’ll repeal laws enacted by the previous congress, just out of revenge for the opposing party.

Jim
Nope. No filibuster. They just need to repeal it through the same process that they used to get it passed, Reconcilliation, which only needs 51 votes and does not require cloture.
 
This article is basing a GOP win over control of the Senate in 2012. That isn’t going to happen.

It also isn’t a reconciliation vote, which is the reconsideration of a law that was approved, but not yet enacted. Obama Care was not only approved, but parts are now in effect.

If they could repeal Obama Care, they could’ve repealed social security and medicare, which they wouldn’t even attempt to do.

Jim
Actually, most models have the GOP taking 55 seats in the Senate and retaining the House. Independents are dropping the Democrats like a hot potato.
 
Ryan pick cements lack of military service in presidential race
Mitt Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan makes this the first presidential election in 80 years in which no one on either ticket has served in the military.
**The last time that happened was 1932, **before the United States helped win World War II and became a military superpower.
articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/11/news/la-pn-ryan-pick-cements-lack-of-military-service-in-presidential-campaign-20120811
 
Biden and Obama have been saying that Ryan and Romney’s tax reform will increase taxes for the middle class and cut taxes for the wealthy by parading an analysis by Tax Policy Center which WSJ says was a ‘highly ideological tract based on false assumptions, incomplete data and dishonest analysis’ and did not analyse the actual Ryan Romney plan

There is also partisan question when 1 of 3 authors of the study between 2009 to 10,
was senior economist for public finance and tax policy with Obama’s council of economic advisers, Adam Lonney

Harvey Rosen of Princeton University says Romney, Ryan plan can be revenue neutral with out raising anybody’s taxes

Relatively little has been said about the possible effects of the Romney proposal on economic growth. This is curious because increasing growth is the motivation for the proposal in the first place.

In this paper, I analyze the Romney proposal taking into account the additional income that might be generated by economic growth. The main conclusion is that under plausible assumptions, a proposal along the lines suggested by Governor Romney can both be revenue neutral and keep the net tax burden on high-income individuals about the same. That is, an increase in the tax burden on lower and middle income individuals is not required in order to make the overall plan revenue neutral.

princeton.edu/ceps/workingpapers/228rosen.pdf
 
Give me a break.

Romney is using this to benefit his campaign.

Why is he there giving a press conference acting like he’s president of the United States, American flags and all, and stating how America will react to this attack?

FYI, he’s not the president.

Jim
Not yet.

People (that care) would like to know how American foreign policy will be conducted next year.
 
Give me a break.

Romney is using this to benefit his campaign.

Why is he there giving a press conference acting like he’s president of the United States, American flags and all, and stating how America will react to this attack?

FYI, he’s not the president.

Jim
Romney could be president, he should be making foreign policy statements as world events occur. Would it have been right for him to go campaigning instead of making a statement about the deaths of US citizens?
 
Give me a break.

Romney is using this to benefit his campaign.

Why is he there giving a press conference acting like he’s president of the United States, American flags and all, and stating how America will react to this attack?

FYI, he’s not the president.

Jim
Not yet anyway;)
 
Polls: Ryan beats Biden in popularity
Paul Ryan has had a higher favorability rating than Vice President Biden in every major nonpartisan national poll since the Wisconsin lawmaker was picked for the GOP vice presidential slot.
In these polls, Ryan averaged a likability factor 7.5 percentage points higher than Biden, and he even bested President Obama’s favorability rating four out of six times.
thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/christian-heinze/248891-polls-ryan-beats-biden-in-popularity-

Colorado Pro-Life Group Endorses Mitt Romney for President

lifenews.com/2012/09/12/colorado-pro-life-group-endorses-mitt-romney-for-president

Romney is leading 5 points in VA

realclearpolitics.com/docs/2012/Gravis_VA_0911.pdf
 
Give me a break.

Romney is using this to benefit his campaign.

Why is he there giving a press conference acting like he’s president of the United States, American flags and all, and stating how America will react to this attack?

FYI, he’s not the president.

Jim
Give us a break. One of the knocks on Romney is his lack of foreign policy experience. Every candidate in existence would do the same thing. He’s running for President.

When the economy collapsed in 08, both candidates reacted. Why would they do any differently? People want to know what they’d do.

To have an issue with this shows a real sense of bias Jim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top