MLB, NFL. NBA support gay pride, boycott?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LittleFlower378
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Boycotting companies that dump money or support abortion and gay marriage I have found to be effective. But now I am considering boycotting the MLB, NFL, and NBA for their support of gay pride and homosexuality.
Yes, you should boycott, but you should also probably boycott TV, movies, newspapers (with the exception of church news), and magazines (with the exception of church magazines).

Most of the media is immoral. You can can make better selections on your own than what they are putting out.

I’m done with the media, and I won’t ever go back.
 
Last edited:
At least you are consistent.

I think my issue with this way of proceeding is that, in a fallen world, every single thing will be a mixture of good and evil. Every thing. Every person. Every place.

Where does it stop? If my doctor has committed adultery, do I refuse to go to her? If the supermarket sells birth control, do I refuse to buy groceries? If the people who make my clothes are in gay relationships, do I not wear clothes?
 
The San Antonio Spurs recently hosted a Catholics Night at one of their home National Basketball Association games, so should non-Catholic Christians want to boycott future Spurs games?
I am a proud Catholic, but I am not going to boycott MLB, NFL or NBA teams just because they cater to other groups.
 
“Most of the media is immoral.” I think that is a brash and over the top statement. There are immoral people who work at a number of different professions, not just some of the folks who work in the print or broadcast news medium. Please don’t paint all with the same brush.
 
(name removed by moderator), you are the voice of reason here. We must all TRY to love one another as sisters and brothers in this world.
 
  1. There are something like 81 home baseball games in a season. If Pride Night bothers you, then you can go to another home game and skip the whole thing.
  2. Commercial Boycott on a large scale is not going to happen because like I said, it’s one game out of 81 games in your town in a season. It’s not happening every week so it’s a blink-and-you-miss-it.
  3. I don’t have kids, or even any kids in the extended family who I’d worry about setting examples for.
Having said that, if the OP wants to boycott, that’s his right and he should feel free to do that, write letters etc.
He will be boycotting a lot of stuff because many if not most US companies support LGBTQ in some visible way from time to time. They are part of the customer base and considered part of the “diversity” of society.
@LittleFlower378 I gave this some thought (before reading the Bear’s post) and my opinion is this: (mind I’m European and a soccer fan)

I wouldn’t boycott because of 1 night-a-year, I’d either skip that or try hard to overlook the kiss-on-screen you mentioned. I’d enjoy the game and love the sport.

I would, however, boycott if I found my club to be actively financing any lobby or pushing an agenda. I don’t mean anti-violence or pro-civil-rights or even in favor tolerance and inclusion (those I’d be very OK with), I mean endorsing and promoting homosexuality as something to engage in. This last approach I would not be OK with, and I would self-impose a commercial boycott.

In a nutshell, I imagine “pride night” can take several forms depending on which I would or not boycott. From your description I imagine it’s pushing a borderline. Since you said you love the game, perhaps my advice is that you don’t let that ruin the game for you - whilst ensuring in your conscience that you aren’t partaking/contributing to an agenda.
 
Last edited:
Also I’m just idly chatting on CAF, not participating in a formal debate. If you want me to answer interrogatories you gotta pay me.
Hey Mancini, fair enough I also chat idly around here 🙂 I am however solicitous enough to do some pro-bono elaborations. If I may ask: What are you carrying on your shoulder in your picture?
 
No, I must respectfully disagree. A fish rots from the head, and I have seen too much about just the composition alone (and here I am referring purely to who staffs the media, starting with the people at the top, and not even to what they do; of course I object to what they put out as well) of the media for me to ever patronize them again. I deliberately left book publishers out because the authors of books are far more disconnected from their publishers than the employees of the regular media.

The question really ought to be, is there anybody in the media who is innocent? The janitorial staff I suppose . . .

Let’s look at it this way: who among the staff of an abortion clinic is innocent? The abortion industry is all about killing infants. And the collective media, well, that just happens to be about telling collective lies and pushing collective agendas on an unsuspecting populace.

Another way of putting it might be that the people who staff the media are connected to it in much the same way that mafia members are connected to the Bonanno, Colombo, Gambino, Genovese, or the Lucchese crime families. We can’t refuse all of them can we? Surely one of those crime families must be innocent. If you don’t like the Bonano, why not choose to patronize the product of the Lucchese? Somebody could say, “Why I know a numbers guy who works for the Lucchese and you could never meet a nicer or more charming guy! You should meet him, he’s a great guy! You’re too judgemental.”

The people in the mafia aren’t all murderers, some of them are bookies, or numbers guys, or con-men. They aren’t so bad. And some of them, are just liars. What’s so bad about that?

If you get into one field of crime, pretty soon you will be into others, and while the mafia might have started off with bootlegging and murder, it didn’t really take them long to get into other scams. And the media just started off with lying. Of course after a while it was lying enough to justify wars and mass murder in the middle East, but, what the hey, they can’t have gotten into other fields of crime, can they?

Nope, I’m just done with them. I watched my last television sometime in late 2007. Never even made the switch to digital from analog. If I hadn’t caught a glimpse of television screens in other people’s houses, I wouldn’t have any idea at all about what digital was like, not that I care.

The media helped launch wars, helped push abortion (to the point of straight out infanticide as of late), gay marriage, the legalization of dope, utterly immoral politicians, and lots of other criminal agendas. No, I’m afraid I can’t patronize anything from them, nothing at all. I’m done, I’m out.
 
Last edited:
By media, I mean the legacy media, the mass media, the corporate media, NBC, CBS, ABC, etc., not forums or specific videos. I will find what I want, I will never ever just sit there watching tv, reading newspapers, reading magazines or watch movies for hour after hour again, all of which are a narrow choice of subject matter preselected for me by somebody who wants me to adopt their agenda.

Besides, they are essentially a mafia. They aren’t the way they portray themselves. Watching the big media is literally immoral. It’s like patronizing the questionable products of an organized crime family.

Question: what war did CAF ever start?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top