The Catholic schools are not teaching the faith either for 5 hours. And, from what I have seen of schools up north, they were falling apart, barely had a gym to support athletics, no clubs, not much in the way of advanced teaching methods…I don’t disagree that the right school ***could ***supply a good Catholic education, but in finding that good school comes a hefty price tag, and many parents simply cannot afford $15k per year for high school tuition for one child. I also think it’s how we live our lives as examples of the faith that count.
I see it as a strong supplement, but it will not determine the future of one’s faith if he/she attends/doesn’t attend. I also like vern’s suggestions, because if the Church highly suggests this to parents, they should find ways to help all Catholic parents be able to send their kids there.
I agree, but it has to be recognized that we are now on the second generation of “loving, caring and sharing”. The parents of the kids who are now grade school age and high school age had no catechesis worthy of the name, for the most part.
I guess it is silly to expect this, but I fail to see why Catholic schools cannot function without frills. Certainly, if the discipline is sufficient, kids can learn very well with the right books and a conscientious teacher. When I went to Catholic grade school, the nuns had two to three classes right in the same room and made it work. Looking at my grandchildrens’ homework, etc, it isn’t anywhere near the grade level ours was.
I do agree with Vern’s suggestion that perhaps some classes could be televised if the teachers aren’t strong enough. But there is also the problem of teacher certification. My state is a “Blaine Amendment” state. Besides prohibiting state aid to parochial schools, the “upside” is that the state purports to have no jurisdiction at all over them. Consequently, parochial schools can do whatever they want, and don’t need teachers who have education degrees. Yet, the schools typically require them. It’s crazy. My brother has a master’s in electrical engineering. Thought he would take early retirement and teach math. Even in the Catholic high schools, he had to have a teaching degree. That deprived students of two years of the best math education that could be imagined, and him of a fair amount of money. And he once taught engineering to undergraduates at Rice University!
I think some of the Catholic schools have gone astray in other ways. In some places, they are really “private academies”, with sky-high tuition and a plutocratic student body. Only the privileged can go to those places.
Catholic schools were initiated to provide Catholic parents with an alternative to public schools which,then, were virtually “protestant schools”. Now, public schools are “secular relativist” schools; just as harmful to children. I think the Church in the U.S. has really blown it in the last 40 years when it comes to Catholic schools.
I don’t understand the following either. Maybe there can never be enough teaching sisters and brothers to provide a significant teaching staff to Catholic schools. But there are teaching orders of a traditional bent, some of which can’t take as many applicants as apply due to lack of facilities, funds, etc. And yet, many many chanceries are full of super-secular nuns who are drawing salaries as diocesan bureaucrats. It just makes no sense at all to me.